No‚ that was a very astute answer. I can see what you’re talking about. Thank you. If you keep watching‚ there is an episode where they celebrate V-A Day which is the day that the war ended. Again‚ if you strip away all the Nazi stuff‚ it could be Thanksgiving. It could be an Independence Day. It is really chilling by how closer it is to the American Dream than not at all. I’m still in season one‚ but I plan to keep watching. I did get to interview Lini Evans who appeared on the show and had wonderful
Premium Film
Hector v. Achilles In Homers Iliad many of the male characters display characteristics that define the heroic warrior code of ancient Greece. They try to obtain glory and power through victories in war; yet still have a distinct human side. Throughout many conflicts described in the Iliad their weaknesses and strengths appear evident. Two examples of this are Achilles and Hector. Both of these men try to uphold the warrior code but with distinctly different approaches in war‚ relationships and
Premium Iliad Achilles Priam
discharge. Courts have ruled that disciplinary policies can be contracts‚ even when employers include at-will statements in them‚ if the policies contain provisions promising that the employer will follow specific disciplinary procedures. So‚ in Dillon v. Champion Jogbra‚ Inc.‚ the Vermont Supreme Court found the disclaimer printed in an employee manual was in conflict with the employer’s elaborate discipline and discharge system‚ which the employer said would be carried out in a fair and consistent
Premium Employment Law Contract
v. anthony Florida v. Anthony On may 24‚ 2011 Casey Anthony was brought to trial for the murder of her daughter Caylee Anthony. Casey Anthony’s was charged with First-degree murder‚ Aggravated child abuse‚ and providing false information to law enforcement. The prosecutor in this case was Linda Drane Burdick‚ who said that Casey wanted nothing more to live the single woman’s life of partying with her boyfriend‚ and going to clubs. She hadn’t had a job in years‚ but lied to her family about going
Premium Jury Lawyer Judge
Day v. Caton 119 MASS. 513 1876 FACTS: Plaintiff Day built a wall between two adjacent estates in Boston and required defendant Carton to pay for a portion of the wall.On the other hand‚ defendant Caton claimed that there was no express contract between Plaintiff Day and himself whereas his silence did not insinuate any promise to pay anything for it. In the trial court‚ the jury found for Plaintiff Day and defendant Caton filed the appeal. ISSUE OR QUESTION: Was the fact sufficient of itself
Premium Appeal Contract Court
Mincey v Arizona 437 US 385 (1978) Court History The Appellant was charged with possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. The defendant was convicted in an Iowa District Court; the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts decision. The United States Supreme Court granted cert. Facts During a narcotics raid on petitioner’s apartment by an undercover police officer and several plainclothes policemen‚ the undercover officer was shot and killed‚ and petitioner was wounded‚ as were two
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Case Brief Case name‚ citation‚ and court Walker v. Quillen 622 A.2d 1097 (Del. 1993) Supreme Court of Delaware Key Facts A. Quillen owns a piece of land known as Bluff Point‚ B. Walker owns a piece of land close to Bluff Point where there is a narrow dirt ‘’public’’ road. C. Implied easement states that Quillen is entitled to cross over a portion of Walker’s land to access Bluff Point. D. Water access was not feasible for access to Bluff Point. E. Walker said
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law Supreme court
throughout the organization for all of the staff along with coming up with a talent review procedure for all of the level positions in the company. Second on the list was generating and implementing a succession of three development programs. Once McDonald’ put their plan out for the development system back in 2001 for all the staff positions‚ they wanted to improve in the most serious areas. First area was placing emphasis on accountability; second step was to increase the difference in performance
Premium Talent management Leadership Management
1. Review the decision in the case of Shah v. HSBC (2012) and evaluate the implications of the decision for regulated financial services firms. In particular: * What are the key issues in the case? * Outline the decision of the court * Evaluate what practical guidelines can be taken from the case by regulated financial services firms Under the proceeds of crimes act 2002 (POCA) all UK financial institutions and other regulated firms not only have to report suspicions of money laundering
Premium Appeal 1965 Lawsuit
Frigaliment v. B.N.S Facts: Frigaliment sued B.N.S. There were two contracts that involved selling chickens. In the first contract B.N.S was in agreeance with selling 75‚000 pounds of 2.5-3 pounds of chicken‚ to Frigaliment. 50‚000 pounds of chicken at 2.5-3 pounds at a higher price were agreed in the second contract. B.N.S fulfilled the first contract with two shipments. The first shipment fell short. B.N.S made up for the short shipment in their second shipment. Frigaliment accused B.N.S of shipping
Premium