Writer’s Response to Peer Review Patricia arias Central Connecticut State University Writing for the Social Work Profession – SW225 4/24/14 Dear ____‚ In this letter I will be responding to a peer review you made on my cover letters. I would like to begin by thanking you for reviewing my and assisting me in improving it. You pointed out certain things I overlooked while completing my first draft and made some helpful suggestions. Throughout the letter I will be addressing the concerns and suggestions
Premium Debut albums Improve Writing
Top of Form [pic] Bottom of Form Peer Review Worksheet Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Please use it for each review that you perform throughout the course. Please copy and paste the completed Review into your reply to the post containing the assigned draft. Please do not post
Premium Writing Peer review Answer
1976‚ Dr. John Sperling founded the University of Phoenix‚ wanting to provide an alternate means of obtaining an education for people who either: had a job without a degree and wanted to earn one‚ or who had a job with a degree but wanted to change their career path so they needed to get a new degree. With the advances of technology‚ college courses became available through one of the very first online classes in the world in 1989 by the University of Phoenix. This made earning a college degree even
Free University Education Higher education
Rules and Regulations (TBON)‚ the Texas Nurse Practice Act (NPA) and the Texas Occupations Code (TOC) guide nursing practice by defining nursing actions and mandating that nurses perform their jobs appropriately. The TBON utilizes the NPA and TOC to review cases with which there are questions regarding the scope of practice and delegation of duties. Of the two cases to be reviewed the first involves a nursing task‚ administration of blood products and Foley catheter insertion that was delegated incorrectly
Free Nursing Registered nurse Peer review
Jon Morse Tec/401 June 6‚ 2011 Team C is researching University of Phoenix and the technology used at the school. The team will research new technology‚ workforce training‚ and recommendations to stay ahead of future challenges. In addition‚ team C will cover value chain analysis and primary technology the school uses for instructions. University of Phoenix has extensive support activities that students and instructors access daily. Team C will retrieve
Premium Technology Value chain
University of Phoenix Material Appendix C Part I Define the following terms: Term | Definition | Discrimination | * This is the denial of opportunities and equal rights to individuals and groups because of prejudice or other arbitrary reasons. * | Institutional discrimination | * This is the denial of opportunities and equal rights to individuals or groups‚ resulting from normal operations of a society. * | Political correctness | * This can also be called political
Premium Discrimination Racism Gender
Self and Peer Assessment Form Project Title: Supreme Yacht Charter Candidate Numbers: 1500495 1. List the candidate numbers in the table below (including yourself). 2. For each member in your group‚ including yourself‚ evaluate the quality of contribution throughout the project (You should use the evaluation criteria above to assign a numeric evaluation) 3. Sum the number of points allocated to each member in the group. Group members candidate number (including yourself) Project Processes
Premium Evaluation Number Assessment
Z302 Peer Evaluation Fall‚ 2014 Your Name: _____________________________ Your Team Number: ________ Your Section (please circle one): TTH@2:30 TTH@5:30 Background & Directions: As noted at the start of the term‚ each Z302 student is to complete a evaluation for each member of his/her team. The evaluation should be based on members’ commitment to his/her assigned team throughout the course of the
Premium Member of Parliament Evaluation Team
When a person tries to review or change their own creations it can be difficult and often useless. When someone writes something‚ no matter how impersonal it is‚ they become attached and biased. Due to the lack of efficiency in correcting our own mistakes we turn to those closest to us to point our flaws‚ our peers. From my experience peer reviews are usually halfhearted comments about a paper you do not care about in order to complete an assignment. However‚ the peer review I received and gave for
Premium Writing Essay Management
was unable to rid himself of a feeling of ‘stickiness’‚ despite 3 hours a day in the shower. His obsession is over the feeling of stickiness and his compulsive act is showering for hours. MEASURES Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (MOCI) Form 4 subscales 30 items – True or False - self report questionnaire Washing/Cleaning Checking Slowness Doubting + : reliable‚ the 2 subscales (washing & checking) were proven to be valid‚ quantitative measure: easy to calculate. : the response
Premium Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor Anxiety