YOFFIE RENEE KIM Cola Wars Conti inue: Coke an Peps in 201 C nd si 10 Fo more than a century‚ Co and Pepsi vied for “th or oke hroat share” o the world’s beverage m of s market. The most intense battles in the so-called col wars were fought over the $74 billio carbonated soft m b la e on drink (CSD) indus stry in the Un nited States.1 In a “carefu ully waged co ompetitive str ruggle” that l lasted from 1975 through the mid-199 both Cok and Pepsi a h 90s‚ ke achieved
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
1. What are the management functions performed by Mr. Goizueta‚ Mr. Hunter‚ and Mr. Ivester? How do their responsibilities differ? The four functions of management are planning‚ organizing leading and controlling. All four functions are used by every manager throughout his work‚ and sometimes managers use more than one function. Mr. Goizueta ‚ the Chief Executive Officer of Coca-Cola‚ used important management functions during his time working ‚ such as planning and leading. He recognized
Premium Coca-Cola
2009 FRANK V. CESPEDES Cola Wars: Goin Global ng op yo By 2008‚ per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) in the United States had declined in seven of the past ei ht years. Annual consumption of CSDs was 740 eight-ounce drinks ig per person in the U.S. versus 288 in the rest of the developed world and 77 in developing countries.1 As a result‚ the Coca-Cola Co. (Coke) and PepsiCo (Pepsi) increasingly looked abroad for growth. Coke and Pepsi approached international
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola Pepsi
planned change management strategies. A structured approach to transfer organization‚ its people and processes from current state to a desired future state is called change management. This process gives employees the ability to accept changes in the existing environment of the business. Change can be of different type for example‚ change in technology‚ operations or strategies etc. company needs to implement individual strategies to cope with each type of change. Coca Cola Corporation is
Premium Change management Coca-Cola
Performance Management Mid-Term Chapter 1 Performance management – is a continuous process of identifying‚ measuring‚ and developing the performance of individuals and teams and aligning performance with strategic goals of the organization Performance appraisal – is the systematic description of an employee’s strengths and weaknesses Performance management contribution – a performance management system can make the following important contributions 1. Motivation to perform is increased 2
Premium Strategic planning Performance management Organization
1.1. Balance Scorecard The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that is used extensively in business and industry‚ government‚ and nonprofits organizations worldwide to align business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization‚ improve internal and external communications‚ and monitor organization performance against strategic goals. (Source: Balancescorecard.org) Financial Perspective PepsiCo has enjoyed a long history of delivering strong
Premium Strategic management Strategy map Balanced scorecard
Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing Guidelines for Supplier Relations Performance with Purpose We are delighted to offer the world’s largest portfolio of billion-dollar food and beverage brands that compete globally and leverage our scale and distribution power. PepsiCo has 18 brands in our portfolio that generate $1 billion or more in annual retail sales. Indra K. Nooyi Chairman and CEO of PepsiCo 2 Responsible Sourcing Guidelines Financial achievement can and must go hand-in-hand with sustainability
Premium Supply chain management Procurement Sustainable development
Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010‚” use game theory approach/analysis to explain the competitive behavior of Coke and Pepsi making specific references to actions taken by each firm and the different “battlefields.” What conclusions can you draw about the competitive strategies pursued by both companies? At the time the Case was written was there a winner? Should both companies have acted differently?Based on the case “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010‚” use game
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
Running Head: COCA COLA AND PEPSI A COMPERATIVE STUDY Coca cola and Pepsi: A comparative study of Pension plans‚ investment and Employment preference April Oaks-Brunson Ms. Brenda Adams Intermediate Accounting III February‚ 18‚2011 COCA COLA AND PEPSI A COMPERATIVE STUDY Coca cola and Pepsi: A comparative study of Pension plans‚ investment and Employment preference Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans The Coca cola has a non-contributory
Premium
http://www.dea.unipi.it/staff/e.giuliani/downloads/CocaPepsi.pdf Cola wars continue: coke and pepsi in 2012 $74B carbonated soft drink industry in the US 1975-1990s‚ coke and pepsi both earned average annual revanue growth of around 10%. In 2000‚ us per capita CSD consumption declined. 2009‚ average American drank 46 gallons of CSD per year‚ loest since 1989. Coke suffered from operational setbacks Pepsi charterd new‚ aggressive course in altnerative beverage and snack Challenges Boost
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Soft drink