QUESTION 1 i. Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liability = $ 14‚651‚000/$ 19‚639‚000 = 0.750 ii. Quick Ratio = (Current Assets – Inventory) / Current Liability = ($ 14‚651‚000 – $ 6‚136‚000) / $ 19‚539‚000 = 0.436 iii. Total Assets Turnover = Sales/Total Assets = $ 167‚310‚000/$ 108‚615‚000 = 1.540 iv. Inventory Turnover = COGS/Inventory = $ 117‚910‚000/$ 6‚136‚000 = 19.216 v. Receivable Turnover = Sales/Account Receivables = $ 167‚310‚000/$ 5‚473
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratios Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
was limited to selling at most 25% of total sales of their soft drink concentrate to local bottlers (Cateora 2007). They were also not allowed to use foreign brand names on their products‚ which meant that PepsiCo had to rename their products Lehar Pepsi and Lehar 7UP. These limitations served to dampen PepsiCo’s advance into the market‚ as well as tamper with the ‘product’ element of their marketing mix by getting rid of the brand’s established name. Coca-cola on the other hand‚ was forced by the
Premium Coca-Cola
competition within the financial services industry is more intense than ever‚ and as banking companies’ service menus are becoming increasingly comparable‚ the need to understand bank customer satisfaction
Premium Bank Islamic banking
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pepsi Cola produces Philippine Inc (PCPPI) grew its net income last year by 192 percent to 44 million on the back of double digit growth in volume and softer sugar prices. For the fourth quarter alone‚ net profit doubled to 147 million on gross sales of 6.2 billion. Volume grew by 21 percent for the quarter; bringing full-year volume growth to an average of is percent across brands and categories. Gross sales for the full year rose percent to P22.73 billion. “This is a significant
Premium Marketing Pepsi Coca-Cola
competition within the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been remarkable ever since Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886‚ and further intensified when Pepsi was introduced in 1893. Ever since then‚ the CSD industry has been dominated by these two companies‚ with Coke taking the lead in the early stage‚ followed by Pepsi doubled its market share between 1950 and 1970 by offering its concentrate at a lower price than its competitor. The CSD industry has been profitable historically due
Premium Brand Coca-Cola Brand management
1. The following listed factors made PepsiAmericas to adopt a more aggressive attitude towards the utilization of transaction data to run the business. * Growth in product variety from 35-40 to nearly 400‚ * Lowering of PAS profit margins‚ * Recession in U.S economy‚ * Decline of U.S market for carbonated soft drinks‚ * National Clients like CVS‚ Wal-Mart and Mobil Gas Stations preference of highly centralized procurement arrangements‚ * Hard to track product flow on various
Premium Management Supply chain management Decision support system
Questions Instructor: Professor Edward H. Chow 周行一 Case study: financial bubble Case: Trouble with a bubble (9-808-067) 1. Why did Irving Fisher believe that stock prices had reached a permanently high plateau? 2. Why did the stock market crash in 1929? 3. Why did influential individuals like Fisher‚ Keynes and Rockefeller believe that the downturn would only be temporary? Case study: investment banking business and global financial crisis Case: Investment banking in 2008 (A): Rise and fall
Premium Stock market Investment
years‚ at the end of which it would be sold for an estimated £70‚000. If the new equipment is purchased‚ the old equipment could be sold for £150‚000 immediately. The assistant to the business’s accountant has prepared a report to help assess the viability of the proposed change‚ which includes the following data: Using new equipment Per unit £ £ Selling price 12.40 Labour (1.20) Materials (3.20) Overheads: Variable
Premium Net present value Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Variable cost
that contain Chinese medicinal herbs. In order to successfully prepare for global expansion‚ organizations must make certain changes to build a culturally diverse environment. It is essential to hire employees with international language skills. Financial resources will also be needed for travel‚ new promotional materials‚ or adapting an existing product to meet the needs of international consumers. The organizational structure of PepsiCo is also affected by global expansion. Six years ago‚ the
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Pepsi
COCA COLA VS.PEPSICO 1. Current Ratio Liquidity Measurement Ratio | Coca Cola | PepsiCo | Current Ratio | 1.13 | 1.44 | The current ratio measures the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations with its short term assets. Between Coca Cola and PepsiCo‚ PepsiCo has a higher current ratio implying that the latter is more capable of paying its obligations. The debt management policies of Coca Cola in conjunction with share repurchase program and investment activity resulted in current
Premium