www.ajbms.org ISSN: 2047-2528 Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences Vol. 2 No. 10 [38-50] Analysis of Customer Satisfaction with the Islamic Banking Sector: Case of Brunei Darussalam Mohamed Sharif Bashir Imam Centre for Banking and Finance Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University Riyadh 11432‚ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia E-mail: mbelsharif@imamu.edu.sa. ABSTRACT During the last decade‚ the Islamic banking sector in Brunei Darussalam experienced remarkable and increasingly
Premium Bank Islamic banking
competition within the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been remarkable ever since Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886‚ and further intensified when Pepsi was introduced in 1893. Ever since then‚ the CSD industry has been dominated by these two companies‚ with Coke taking the lead in the early stage‚ followed by Pepsi doubled its market share between 1950 and 1970 by offering its concentrate at a lower price than its competitor. The CSD industry has been profitable historically due
Premium Brand Coca-Cola Brand management
YOFFIE tC Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century For over a century‚ Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles of the cola wars were fought over the $60-billion industry in the United States‚ where the average American consumed 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) per year. In a “carefully waged competitive struggle‚” from 1975 to 1995 both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual growth of around
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
COCA COLA VS.PEPSICO 1. Current Ratio Liquidity Measurement Ratio | Coca Cola | PepsiCo | Current Ratio | 1.13 | 1.44 | The current ratio measures the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations with its short term assets. Between Coca Cola and PepsiCo‚ PepsiCo has a higher current ratio implying that the latter is more capable of paying its obligations. The debt management policies of Coca Cola in conjunction with share repurchase program and investment activity resulted in current
Premium
strictly prohibit the bottler fromtaking on business from new competing brands. Furthermore‚ if a concentrateproducer wanted to build their own bottling plants due to the inability to bottlefrom the existing bottling plants as prohibited by Coke and Pepsi; the newbottling plant would require an extensive capital expenditure on advertising‚building brand image and loyal customers‚ and paying retailer for shelf space asPepsi and Coke pay retailers 15-20% for putting their beverages in the front of the
Premium Brand Coffee Vending machine
Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for a “throat share” of the soft drinks market for more than a century. Carbonated soft drinks (CSD) contributed to majority of the revenues in soft drinks. 丁he core market was Ihc United States which had high per capita consumption (see Exhibit 1 for per capita consumption of carbonates in select countries). The Americas accounted for 54% of the global CSD market. Europe for 34.5%‚ and Asia-Pacific for 1 \%.] The industry was characterized by the presence of strong
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink
company has had their ups and downs with rebranding of cans causing public confusion and new products falling short. Even with all their past mistakes they still manage to be a household name and a very strong contender in the debate of Coke vs. Pepsi. Very recently‚ Coca-Cola launched a new campaign called “Share a Coke”. The basis of the campaign was that on every coke bottle there was either a first name‚ such as Thomas or Emily‚ or something more general like Share a Coke with friends or family
Premium Coca-Cola Diet Coke Sprite
Week 5 Case Assignment MRKT 5000 PepsiCo: “Pepsi Sales Bubble with Limited-Edition Soft Drinks” Case Summary: Pepsi and their partner‚ Suntory‚ are using limited-edition soft drinks to boost market share in the $30 billion Japanese beverage market and keep sales bubbling despite a cola war with Coca-Cola and fierce competition for space on store shelves. No new product is a sure thing‚ but the Japanese market is particularly challenging. Of the 1‚500 beverages launched there every year‚ only
Premium Marketing Coca-Cola Product management
Laura Lindroth GBS 235 Paper #1 Prof Cherivtch 21 March 2015 Response Paper: Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India 1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not‚ could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? There have been several aspects
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink
the Diet Pepsi cans‚ it is clearly showed that the company had demonstrated an effective halting from the company’s openness with the media. While dealing and handling with the crisis‚ the PR team of Pepsi focused on both their internal and external publics. It is important for an organization to have a strong internal communication as these internal publics helps to convince the external publics of the organization. The internal publics of Pepsi were consists of the employees of Pepsi like executives
Premium Communication Public relations Management