Feb. 15‚ 2015 Pepsi Blue Yanran YAN Pepsi Blue Case Analysis I. Strategic Situation In 1995‚ Pepsi-‐Cola International (PCI) headquarter planned to carry out a $500 million global brand identity and logo plan‚ also known as Project Blue. The plan failed to get support from regional executives. The better way to carry out a
Premium Pepsi
SWOT‚ PESTLE and Porter’s 5 forces analysis of Pepsi Co Please Read This Carefully First!!! The intended purpose of Our research papers is that they are used as models to assist in the preparation of Your own research papers. We neither endorse nor tolerate any form of plagiarism‚ whole or partial‚ and will not engage in any activity that facilitates cheating. Papers For You or its affiliates will NEVER sell a model paper to ANY student giving us ANY reason to believe that (s)he will submit our
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Soft drink
Why Crystal Pepsi and Others Failed We live in a day and age where marketing and advertising is stronger then ever. It is essentially in our face every where we turn‚ from the clothes we wear to the music we listen to and even the device we use to listen to our music. Marketing and advertising touches our lives everyday without our really ever even noticing it. Marketing professionals have a difficult challenge before them in figuring out a way to create a public interest‚ and a want for their
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
UNETHICAL PRACTICES BY COCA COLA AND PEPSI INTRODUCATION: AUTHORIZATION: This report is being submitted to DR. Muhammad Khalili‚ Professor of business ethics‚ University of Wollongong in Dubai. The topic of the report is unethical issues of coca cola in comparison with Pepsi. Purpose of the Report: In today’s competitive world‚ many organizations are practicing unethical practices to increase their productivity and profit without caring for the consequences of their actions. In order to stay ahead
Premium Pepsi Cola Coca-Cola
Coke Is Better Than Pepsi Pepsi and Coca Cola have long been rivals in the marketing industry and two most recognizable names in soft drinks. Together they produce the #1 (Coca Cola)‚ #2 (Diet Coke) and #3 (Pepsi) soft drinks in the United States and each make tens of billions of dollars in profits every year. Since 1886‚ Coke has been going strong holding the award of "Best Soda Drink in the World." In 2011‚ Coke still beats Pepsi in sales and long-term taste tests. I totally agree because to
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Soft drink
PRODUCT REPORT ’’ Crystal Pepsi Prepared by Yeo & Ong March 5‚ 2009 There was a marketing fad in early 1990s equating clarity with purity. Just to name a few‚ Miller Brewing Co. came up with Miller Clear(March 1993)‚ Coors Brewing Co. came up with Zima Clearmalt (1992)‚ Procter & Gamble came up with Ivory clear liquid hand cleanser and Colgate-Palmolive came up with Clear Sparkling fresh dishwashing liquid. Last but not least‚ PepsiCo came up with Crystal Pepsi in April 1992. Company Brief
Premium Pepsi Cola Coca-Cola
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty- First Century As given in exhibit 1. Per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks has rose from 1970 to 1999 but in year 2000 there has been a slight drop in per capita consumption. However if we see the similar data for other drinks‚ there has either been a slight rise or fall in per capita consumption in the year 2000. So the per capita consumption data reveals that other drinks are not necessarily eating up the market share of carbonated
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Soft drink
YOFFIE tC Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century For over a century‚ Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles of the cola wars were fought over the $60-billion industry in the United States‚ where the average American consumed 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) per year. In a “carefully waged competitive struggle‚” from 1975 to 1995 both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual growth of around
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
http://www.casetutors.com/22115/Coke-versus-Pepsi-2001-V-4-1.html Coke versus Pepsi 2001 V 4 1 Case ID - UVAF1340 Solution ID - 22115 1836 Words Abstract This case analysis takes into consideration the post 2001 period in which PepsiCo acquired Quaker Oats Company. The case analyzes the rivalry and competitive relationship between PepsiCo and Coca Cola. The case puts forward the concepts of EVA WACC and CAPM. The main goal of the case is to analyze the health of both companies in relation
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
industry‚ smaller national producers‚ such as Seven-Up and Dr Pepper‚ are relatively trivial. There are a lot of players of same size in the bottling industry. Unlike the furious competition between Pepsi and Coke‚ no sense of competition can be felt in bottling industry. Reasons are that‚ first‚ Pepsi and Coke control the majority of bottlers in 1990s; second‚ intrabrand competition is restricted by the franchise agreement‚ which is protected by ’Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act’. From the
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola Pepsi