Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century: Threat of Entry:low 1. Economies of scale - High production volume but merit not clear (1st paragraph on page 2) 2. Product differentiation - Brand identification (high advertising expense‚ Exhibit 2) 3. Capital requirements - CPs: little capital investment (1st paragraph on page 2) - Bottlers: capital intensive (2nd paragraph on page 3) 4. Cost disadvantages independent of size - No 5. Access to distribution channels - Food stores (35%): intense
Premium Coca-Cola Brand Logo
THE BEVERAGE BATTLEFIELD In 2003‚ Jagdeep Kapoor‚ chairman of Samsika Marketing Consultants in Mumbai (formerly Bombay)‚ commented that "Coke lost a number ofyears over errors. But at last it seems to be getting its positioning right." Similarly‚ Ronald McEachern‚ PepsiCo ’s Asia chief‚ asserted "India is the beverage battlefield for 2003." The experience ofthe world ’s two giant soft drinks companies in India during the 1990s and the beginning of the new millennium was not a happy one‚ even though
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
Pepsi is a manufacturer or use manufacturers‚ market and sell a variety of salty‚ sweet and grain-based snacks‚ carbonated and non-carbonated beverages‚ and foods through their North American and international divisions. B) Coca-Cola has the dominant position in beverage sales. C) Coca-Cola 2006 $29‚963‚ 2007 $43‚269 The difference is $13‚306 for a 44.4% increase. Pepsi 2006 $29‚930‚ 2007‚ $34‚628 The difference is $4‚698 for a 15.6% increase. D) Pepsi had
Premium Revenue Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
.................................... 1 Coca Cola versus Pepsi Cola – The History.................................................................................. 2 Examples of Coca Cola vs Pepsi De-Positioning .......................................................................... 3 Critical Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 5 Conclusion.........................................................
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
dy Managerial Economics Coke vs. Pepsi: An Economic Analysis Rebecca Simmons Managerial Economics Dr Sol Drescher December 4‚ 2012 Executive Summary In this case study we will do an economic analysis of two major competitors; Coke® and Pepsi®. We will look at the history of these to competitive giants and discuss how they have evolved over the years to become rivals in the 21st Century. In this case study we
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
Have you ever wondered if the sugar content in Coke and Pepsi has altered you or your friends preference? In this experiment‚ we tested to see if the sugar content changes peoples preference over Coke and Pepsi. We chose this experiment because we would like to see how people change their opinions of their favorite soda‚ after we have informed them of the sugar content. This experiment of Coke vs Pepsi is tied into chemistry by the percentage of the compound/sugar in each can of soda. Background
Premium Coca-Cola Diet Coke Thums Up
CHAPTER 6 Entering Global Markets “The multinational corporation knows a lot about a great many countries and congenially adapts to supposed differences..... By contrast‚ the global corporation knows everything about one great thing. It knows about the absolute need to be competitive on a worldwide basis as well as nationally and seeks constantly to drive down prices by standardising what it sells and how it operates. It treats the world as composed of a few standardised markets rather than
Premium Marketing Marketing research Joint venture
REPORT ON RURAL MARKETING [PEPSICO V/S COCA COLA] GROUP-1 MANSI GEHLOT(6103) KRITI KANSAL(6136) ARPIT MITTAL(6114) UTSAV MAGGU(6127) KRITESH KUMAR(6207) RURAL MARKETING - INDIAN PRESPECTIVE The Indian rural market with its vast size offers great opportunities to the marketers. Two-third s of the Indian consumers reside in rural areas and almost 1/2 of the national income is generated here in these areas. It is thus
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Pepsi
com/archives/964 Questions: Write what you believe are the current global brand positionings for Coke and Pepsi (the brands‚ not the companies)? Few other companies in the world have been able to construct and manage their brands as well as these companies. Much of the successful of these companies can be attributed to way in which they have managed their soft drink brands. Coke has positioned itself as an integral‚ crucial part of people’s everyday lives. The brand‚ particularly through
Premium Brand management Advertising Brand
Coke has been leading the competition from 1998-2002 in terms of higher market capitalization‚ gross margin and net income. However‚ Pepsi was leading the fight in terms of growth in revenue and net income. However‚ Pepsi’s stock performed 45% better than Coke’s stock. Overall‚ Pepsi was a smaller company but it was growing faster than Coke. Coke had a strong foundation‚ however‚ their revenue during this period increased due to summer months artificially increasing the demand. Pepsi‚ on the other
Premium Coca-Cola Cola