The PepsiCo Company never ends the World’s #2 carbonated soft drink maker. The company’s soft drinks include Coke‚ Sprite and Fanta. Coca-Cola is not the company’s only beverage; Coca-Cola sells Minute Maid juice brands‚ Aquarius sports drinks‚ and Kinley water. PepsiCo and Coca-Cola hold together‚ a market share of 95% out of which 60.8% is held by Coca-Cola and the rest by Pepsi. Problem Identification 1) Losing market share to its competitors Pepsi’s main competitor‚ Coca-Cola has
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola Frito-Lay
Case Study –Nike‚ Inc.: Cost of Capital FIN202a-Spring 2011 1. Please define Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). Write down the WACC formula‚ and discuss its components. WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) is a market weighted average‚ at target leverage‚ of the cost of after tax debt and equity. It is a critical input for evaluating investment decision‚ and typically the discount rate for NPV calculation. And it serves as the benchmark for operating performance‚ relative to
Premium
In the case study‚ PepsiCo is considering in Carts of Colorado and/or California Pizza Kitchen. Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired businesses‚ but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability PepsiCo itself. Would investing in other companies be the best way to expand PepsiCo? This question is important
Premium Fast food Pizza Hut KFC
Apparently‚ the issue of Nike’s case is to control and check the calculation cost of capital done by Joanna Cohen who is the assistant of a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group. But I am willing to tell you that it can be a complex case in which we can doubt about sensitivity analysis done by Kimi Ford (portfolio manager) too. Because her assumptions such as Revenue Growth Rate‚ COGS / Sales‚ S &A / Sales‚ Current Assets / Sales‚ and Current Liability / Sales have been adopted from previous income
Premium
1. Discuss how PepsiCo uses its talent to sustain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. PepsiCo understands that its competitive advantage lies in its human capital. It is globally recognized for its ability to generate leaders that have achieved success internally and externally. “Talent sustainability is about having the right people‚ in the right place‚ at the right time‚ doing the right job‚ the right way”‚ (Rob Silzer‚ Ben E. Dowell‚ p618‚ 2010). PepsiCo’s talent sustainability
Premium Human resource management Talent management Learning
hurdle rates is critical to accepting or rejecting projects‚ Marriott should be precise by calculating and using division-specific rates on division-specific projects. We used the WACC method so that our hurdle rates would reflect appropriate cost of debt and cost of equity‚ as explained in our subsequent analysis. We found Marriott’s hurdle rates: 8.646% for hotels‚ 10.94% for restaurants‚ 11.094% for contracts‚ and 9.688% for the entire company. Marriott should use the division-specific hurdle rates
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Finance Economics
directed towards investors of PepsiCo. People invested in PepsiCo provide the company with the funds needed to run the corporation properly therefore it is very important for Nooyi to address shareholders’ concerns and questions throughout the message. Although investors are the primary focus‚ other audiences may include the general public‚ consumers of PepsiCo products‚ environmentalists‚ government agencies‚ government officials‚ and any and all stakeholders of PepsiCo and the manner in which they
Premium Indra Nooyi Audience Newspaper
John D.R. Leonard v. PepsiCo‚ INC. 1. (a)What are the facts and (b) sources of law in this case? a. Defendant PepsiCo conducted a promotional campaign in Seattle‚ Washington from October 1995 to March 1996. The promotion‚ titled "Pepsi Stuff‚" attempted to persuade consumers into collecting numerous "Pepsi Points" in order to redeem them for merchandise featuring the Pepsi logo. During this campaign‚ PepsiCo launched a promotional commercial intended for the Pepsi Generation‚’ in order to gain
Premium Contract
I. Introduction Kimi Ford‚ a portfolio manager for the mutual-fund management group NorthPoint‚ was reviewing the financials of Nike Inc. to consider buying shares for the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund that she managed. A week prior‚ Nike Inc. held an analysts’ meeting to share their 2001 fiscal results and develop a strategy to revitalize the company. II. Background of Firm Nike’s revenues since 1997 had grown from $9 billion‚ while net income had fallen $220 million. A study written by Douglas
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Arithmetic mean Stock
Mortensen estimate Midland’s cost of capital? What would be the potential consequences of a too high estimate compared to the firm’s “true” cost of capital? What about a too low estimate? The purpose is that the cost capital will be used for capital budgeting‚ financial accounting‚ performance assessment‚ stock repurchases estimations. Also the cost of capital is a necessary basis for the expected growth and forecasted demand. The too high estimated cost of capital means that Midland may miss out
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Progressive tax Investment