Hydrogen carbonate solution | | 1 | 2 | mean | 1 | 2 | mean | 0 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 250 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 500 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 750 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 1000 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.53 | Results Results The results do not show the general relationship between light intensity and photosynthesis that could normally be seen had the experiment taken place without errors. The
Free Carbon dioxide Photosynthesis Light
psychologist‚ and student of Solomon Asch‚ conducted a controversial experiment in 1961‚ investigating obedience to authority. The experiment was held to see if a subject would do something an authority figure tells them‚ even if it conflicts with their personal beliefs and morals. This experiment brought uproar amongst the psychological world and caused the code of ethics to be reviewed and ultimately changed. In the experiment subjects were asked to administer shocks ranging from fifteen volts
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram
The main focus of this experiment was to find the relationship between temperature and the enzyme activity of amylase. This was achieved by attaining amylase enzyme‚ starch solution and potassium iodide (determines if enzymes hydrolyses the starch solution)‚ water bath and a hot plate. The temperatures used for this experiment were room temperature‚ 37oC‚ 60oC‚ 80oC‚ and 90oC. The hypothesis developed was that as the temperature increased‚ so will enzyme activity. Therefore‚ the ability of the
Premium
process of photosynthesis. Problem What is the relationship between light intensity and the rate of photosynthesis? Pre-Lab Discussion Read the entire investigation. Then‚ work with a partner to answer the following questions. 1. What are the variables in this experiment? Identify the manipulated and responding variables and two controlled variables. The manipulated variable is light intensity. The responding variable is pH. Controlled variables include the initial pH‚ the size of the plant
Premium Light Eye Color
respiration (Evert RF‚ Eichhorn SE & Perry JB 2013). This experiment focuses on the enzyme catalase. Catalase breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. Hydrogen peroxide is a waste product of cell metabolism that can be toxic to the cell (Evert RF‚ Eichhorn SE & Perry JB 2013). The
Premium Enzyme Oxygen Chemical reaction
In this experiment‚ we planted bean plants and put stress on them by rubbing them a certain amount of times a day. This was to see how they might survive in a windy area or in an environment where they might constantly be touched or moved around. The bean plants were
Premium Seed Plant morphology Plant
Experiment 1: TLC Analysis of Analgesic Drugs 1/23/2011 Purpose: The goal of this experiment is to test our knowledge and understanding of TLC analysis by having us do a TLC analysis of analgesics to figure out their main chemical components. Calculations: 1.) Rf = Distance spot traveled/ distance solvent traveled Results: Table 1: TLC Analysis Analgesic Drugs | Rf Value | Acetaminophen | 0.323 | Aspirin | 0.597 | Caffeine | 0.081 | Unknown 154 (Plate 1) | 0.081‚ 0.306‚ 0.597
Premium Aspirin Codeine Paracetamol
I don’t think this experiment should be replicated today. The reason being is that the Generation we have today has a different mindset and that the experiment is unethical in my view. In 1961‚ Milgram was able to make the participants agree with the experiment. These results led to people trying out these trails because the participants knew the shock would be painful but not dangerous. With that being said‚ it shows you the mindset of the people during that time. People were laid back and were
Premium Psychology Stanford prison experiment Ethics
Press. • Zimbardo‚ P. G.‚ Maslach‚ C.‚ & Haney‚ C. (2000). Reflections on the Stanford Prison Experiment: Genesis‚ transformations‚ consequences. In T. Blass (Ed.)‚ Obedience to authority: Current Perspectives on the Milgram paradigm (pp.193-237). Mahwah‚ N.J.: Erlbaum. • Haney‚ C.‚ & Zimbardo‚ P. G. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist‚ 53‚ 709-727. • Zimbardo‚ P. G.‚ Haney‚ C.‚ Banks‚ W. C.‚ & Jaffe‚ D
Premium Prison Stanford prison experiment
Part I - Illumination Experiments (1924-27) These experiments were performed to find out the effect of different levels of illumination (lighting) on productivity of labour. The brightness of the light was increased and decreased to find out the effect on the productivity of the test group. Surprisingly‚ the productivity increased even when the level of illumination was decreased. It was concluded that factors other than light were also important. Part II - Relay Assembly Test Room Study (1927-1929)
Premium Motivation Bank