on 25/01/2013] Schuler‚ R & Jackson‚ S (1999). Strategic Human Resource Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Whole Foods Market Handbook‚ 2011. Festing M (1997). International human resource management strategies in multinational corporations: Theoretical assumptions and empirical evidence from German firms. Manage. Int. Rev.‚ pp. 517-521 Gardenswartz L‚ Cherbosque J‚ Rowe A (2010) Goh SC (1998). Toward a Learning Organization: The Strategic Building Blocks. SAM Adv. Manage. J.‚ 63(2): 15-20
Premium Human resource management Management Organizational culture
External environment appraisal • Introduction and characteristics • Environmental sectors o Market o Technological o Supplier o Economic o Regulatory o Political o Socio cultural • Environmental scanning [pic] What is environment? ← It is the surroundings‚ external objects‚ influences or circumstances under which someone or something exists ← It is the aggregate of
Premium Economics Political science Distribution
ection 1: Introduction - Introduces the reader to factors driving the need for a Strategic Staffing planning process in state government. Section 2: Basic Strategic Staffing Concepts - Defines the parameters of Strategic Staffing; lists objectives and benefits of using the process. Section 3: A Recommended Process - Introduces the Strategic Staffing model. The accompanying narrative describes each step. Included is an explanation of the roles and responsibilities of the key individuals who need
Premium Planning Management Plan
Organisational Appraisal of Nike with its competitiors Ratios (Summary) -NIKE Nike Inc.‚ liquidity ratios | May 31‚ 2012 | May 31‚ 2011 | May 31‚ 2010 | May 31‚ 2009 | May 31‚ 2008 | May 31‚ 2007 | Current ratio | 2.98 | 2.85 | 3.26 | 2.97 | 2.66 | 3.13 | Quick ratio | 1.82 | 1.94 | 2.32 | 1.93 | 1.68 | 2.07 | Cash ratio | 0.97 | 1.15 | 1.53 | 1.05 | 0.84 | 1.10 | Source: Based on data from Nike Inc. Annual Reports http://www.stock-analysis-on.net/NYSE/Company/Nike-Inc/Ratios/Liquidity#Ratios-Summary
Premium Financial ratio Supply chain management 1916
INVESTMENT APPRAISAL Exercise1: Project K has a cost of $52‚125‚ its expected net cash inflows are $12‚000 per year for 8 years‚ and its cost of capital is 12%. a. What is the project’s PP (time thu hồi dc vốn)? b. What is the project’s DPP? c. What is the project’s NPV? d. What is the project’s IRR? a) PP = 52‚125/12‚000 = 4.34 b) 52‚125 – 12‚000/1.12 – 12‚000/1.12^2 – 12‚000/1.12^3 – 12‚000/1.12^4 – 12‚000/1.12^5 – 12‚000/1.12^6 = 2788 PV (7) = 12000/1.12^7 = 5428 DPP = 6 + 2788/5428
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Investment
SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT LESSON 20 PROJECT APPRAISAL Learning Objectives Definition • Scope of appraisal • Steps followed in project appraisal Project appraisal can be defined as the promoter taking a second look critically and carefully at a project as presented by the promoter person who is in way involved in or connected with its preparation and who is as such able to take an independent‚ dispassionate and objective view of the project in its totality as also in respect of
Premium Economics Cost-benefit analysis Cost
EMERGENCE OF 3G TECHNOLOGY AND ITS CURRENT RELEVANCE 3G: THE EVOLUTION Almost 10 or 20 years ago‚ we might not have imagined that mobile phones will become an integral part of our lives. I have a personal experience with a friend who recently lost her mobile phone. She basically uses her phone for everything from work such as sending e-mails to keeping touch with friends and families via voice and video calls. This incident has made her depressed and as she described it‚ it was as if she
Free Mobile phone GSM Vodafone
2.1.1. Literature survey and details on Performance management The central part of Performance management is rating employee’s performance as synergy. Performance management is the process through which managers ensure that employee’s activities and outputs contribute to the organization’s goals [1]. The main requirements of the process are to know what activities and output is desired‚ to observe whether they occur‚ and to provide feedback to help employees meet expectations. While taking feedback
Premium Management Human resource management
Health Policy 80 (2007) 314–327 Panning for gold: An evidence-based tool for assessment of performance indicators in primary health care Roshan Perera a‚∗ ‚ Tony Dowell a ‚ Peter Crampton b ‚ Robin Kearns c b Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice‚ Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences‚ University of Otago‚ P.O. Box 7343 Wellington‚ New Zealand Department of Public Health‚ Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences‚ University of Otago‚ Wellington‚ New Zealand
Premium Medicine Health economics Healthcare
Inequalities in Health Appraisal Inequalities in health have many factors but these can be argued against as to whether they are the actual cause. Social class is a factor‚ along with region‚ age‚ gender‚ ethnicity etc. Measuring the impact of social class is difficult because social classes have changed over the years‚ eg) working class living conditions have changed‚ and there is a delay in the onset of diseases‚ eg) Asbestos related illness. (NICE 2009) However the Black Reports (1980)
Premium Sociology Health care Medicine