there a God?” but also the questions If there is‚ then what is he like? and‚ most important of all‚ What does that mean for us? 2. Give a brief history of the “philosophies” of religion. Ancient Philosophy‚Medieval Philosophy‚ Early Modern Philosophy‚ Nineteenth-Century Philosophy‚Twelth-century philosophy. Philiophers like that of Plato‚ Aristotle‚ St. Aquinas‚ Sartre‚ Hegel‚ St. Anselm etc. 3. What is the human position on the principle of causality in relation to the existence of God and
Premium Philosophy Religion Metaphysics
Henry David Thoreau once said “the question is not what you look at‚ but how you see”. Every full proof plan or a perfect solution must and will have a flaw in it as what seems like a perfect plan to some people may not seem like that to some one else. It will depend on each individual’s point of view which will obviously vary. Have you ever experienced a moment in your life where your full proof plan‚ the perfect interpretation just falls apart and you can’t do anything about it? Let me assist
Premium Critical thinking Future Scientific method
The existence of god has been a question that has ravaged mankind since we began to think logically. Many philosophers argue that there may or may not be a god‚ or that there may even be different types of gods. It is hard to say whether or not god can exist because there is a limited supply of knowledge regarding the issue. So who knows what we could possibly be missing on this journey to find the answer. Yet our way of thinking has evolved enough to allow us to grasp more complex ideas to make
Premium God Metaphysics Existence
us by a God that is perfect (36). He shows this by first arguing for the existence of God‚ and from there he deduces that all of our clear and distinct ideas are innate and entirely trustworthy (36). By proving that all of our clear and distinct ideas are caused by God and that God is an infinite and perfect (non-deceptive) being‚ Descartes believes that he will be able to show that all of our clear and distinct ideas are entirely trustworthy. So he begins by proving the existence of God. The argument
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Truth
Descartes: Proof of God’s existence and human error Unlike considerations emanating from theologians as to how proof that their God‚ defined as an active being by itself‚ was not an invention‚ the demonstration Descartes does regarding the proof of the existence of God and therefore the human error is simple: it shows God from man. Descartes says‚ "I would not have the idea of an infinite substance‚ me as a finite being‚ if it had been placed in me by some substance that was truly infinite."
Premium Truth Metaphysics Theology
In addition‚ these changes can be further distinguished in Descartes belief that he can develop assertions of existence from his conception of ‘I think.’ For Descartes‚ res cogitans is established to be a finite substance. However‚ he concludes that an infinite substance‚ God‚ could not have originated in himself and therefore must be the cause of this idea‚ which results in God necessarily existing - ‘the idea that enables me to understand a supreme deity‚ eternal‚ infinite‚ omniscient‚ omnipotent
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Epistemology
There have been many arguments and philosophical beliefs of the existence of god. For many centuries‚ there have been many attempts by many philosophers to prove the existence of God. Many philosophers’ arguments for the existence of God come in many different evidence like using science‚ personal experience‚ history and philosophy. Looking at the philosopher’s point of view‚ I have come across two arguments that explain the existence of god which is the cosmological and ontological argument. As of today
Premium Existence Ontology Metaphysics
mind by trying to find a solution and proving the existence of God. By proving that God is the one that gives us a clear and different perception which means‚ that God is perfect in every way and the he does not deceive anyone. Because of this he is able to secure a sense of certainty for these clear and distinct perceptions‚ therefore he is setting out to prove that God exists. He gives two arguments for the existence of God. He gives a role God plays in his theory of knowledge. I agree with Descartes
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Ontology
One of the most interesting arguments for the Existence of God comes from Anselm and the Ontological argument. According to the Ontological argument‚ there is no reason to go out and look for physical evidence of God’s existence. The ontological argument is based completely on reason and comes from the concept of a “being than which no greater can be conceived.” Anselm suggested that if such a “being” does not truly exist then a greater being can be conceived. But how does this make any sense? Nothing
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
philosophy conceived by the seventh century He was a mathematician and French philosopher. Pascal argued that a rational person should reside in as though they live and attempt to believe that God does exist. A lot of philosophers think Pascal is the most fragile of all disagreements for believing that God does exists. Pascal thought it was the strongest and he was one of the most dubious philosophers whoever wrote. In order to understand Pascal’s Wager you have to be aware of the setting of the
Premium God Philosophy Faith