Collaboration and Peer Reviews Reflective Journal 3 One major advantage of collaborating on a project is that working with a group can infuse a project with a rich array of perspectives. Another advantage is it makes the project more time effective because you have a group and you can assign different tasks to each member. A disadvantage of collaborating is that you are dealing with a lot of different personalities that can sometimes clash. Another disadvantage would be some members may be
Premium Collaboration Education Psychology
A literature review is important for finding and evaluating peer-reviewed sources for writing a research paper. “Peer-review is the act of carefully evaluating a work by one or more experts of the same field of work‚ to determine its credibility‚ research methodology‚ accuracy‚ and relevance to the literature” (Camtasia Studio 8‚ 2014). Using sources that are peer-reviewed is important because “culturally proficient research practices are necessary to dispel destructive myths and stereotypes” and
Premium Sociology Social work Research
This semester and peer tutor has been great. I have had the chance to be with two students‚ Keenan and Steven. The importance of being a peer tutor is to give the students support in their classes. Guide them through their work. Also just to be an example of good behavior‚ hard working skills‚ and social skills. There are more things of why it is important to be a peer tutor but those are just the basic ones. But doing all of these things for the student is what makes a difference in their lives
Premium 2006 singles Disability English-language films
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* |What is the main point of this paper? | | | | | | |The main point of this paper is to inform the audience about gun control. | |
Premium Peer review Firearm Gun politics
Self and Peer Editing Checklist Self Edit Yes/No Peer Edit Completed by ___________________________________ Yes/No & Comments Did I include an interesting hook to grab the reader’s attention? Did she include an interesting hook to grab the reader’s attention? Did I provide enough background information to let the reader know what/why this is an issue? Did she provide enough background information to let the reader know what/why this is an issue? Did I state a clear claim‚ that argues only one
Premium Critical thinking The Reader Attention
Peer Reviewed Articles Karen Quave PSY 325 Sasha Fleary June 10‚ 2013 The first article I chose is called “Case Study in Threats of Workplace Violence From a Non-Supervisory Basis. The case study explores ethical and legal issues concerning employees who bring weapons to work and the psychological effect of that on other employees (Taylor & Zeng). Another thing that is examined in this case study is peer bullying and threats of workplace violence. The accompanying literature of
Premium Aggression Anger Employment
Travel Log Peer Evaluation I chose to do my peer evaluation on Jessica. Her speech really stood out to me above the others and that is why I chose to do my evaluation on her. Her speech was about her trip to the Rivera Maya. She started her speech with an awesome introduction explaining that the reason for her trip to the Rivera Maya was that she had just got married and was going on her honeymoon. The content of Jessica’s speech was very organized. She explained her trip chronology from the first
Premium Explanation Thought Critical thinking
secure job‚ you have no intention of leaving it any time soon. There are‚ however‚ certain situations that can put the idea of seeking a new job front and center in your mind. 1. Significant social gatherings with your peer group. Attending a social gathering where you’ll be among peers who are close in age and life experience can inspire a desire for change. For instance‚ you decide to attend your high school or college reunion. The reason you go is to catch up with old friends you knew back in the
Premium Employment Management Human resource management
Dear Anna‚ In this letter I will be responding to a peer review you made on my personal narrative. I would like to begin by thanking you for reviewing my narrative and assisting me in improving it. You pointed out certain things I overlooked while completing my first draft and made some helpful suggestions. Throughout the letter I will be addressing the concerns and suggestions you made on my peer review. I will be addressing issues concerning the organization and structure‚ the introduction‚ thesis
Premium Writing Debut albums Sociology
The peer teaching lesson I created was on graphing through problem solving in an inquiry-based environment. I had a broad idea of what I wanted to accomplish‚ and with the help of my professor‚ peers‚ and host teacher I was able to create the lesson that accomplished the concept I wanted to sharpen. My host teacher gave me some ideas to keep the students engaged‚ because she was afraid if there was a lot of wait time that the students would get out of hand. My professor gave me the idea of showing
Premium Education Teacher Learning