Why did Google issue the statement of January 12? 1). The direct reason was Google detected highly sophisticated attacks from China on its computer systems‚ which tried to access email accounts of Chinese human rights activists. 2). The real reason was Chinese government’s censorship regulation against to the core principles in Google. Since both of them insisted with their own principles and cannot cp 2. Can Google take comfort
Premium China Strategy Han Chinese
Case Study: Google in China Google issued a statement mentioning the attacks across the Internet generated from China and declaring its unwillingness to censor search results any more and indicating its decision of exiting China. Several months later‚ the company moved from Beijing to Hong Kong‚ out of Mainland China‚ and still has provided services to users in Mainland China‚ but also has faced many difficulties. This case is very typical and meaningful for foreign companies‚ which have willingness
Premium Hong Kong China People's Republic of China
communications standpoint? Google entered China in 2006 with high hopes of taking over the Chinese internet market. In order to become a major player for internet search engines in China‚ however‚ they had buckled and filtered search results according to the Chinese government. When Google.cn was launched‚ a loud public outcry over its giving in to the Chinese government on censoring and filtering search engine results‚ the company faced a communications crisis. Since Google had always been known for
Premium Web search engine Yahoo! Google search
Google in China Q1: What philosophical principles did Google’s managers adopt when deciding that the benefits of operating in China outweighed the costs. Google’s managers made the decision to operate in China because of vast profit assumptions and predictions. Therefore they had to adopt to the local Chinese habits and the governments restraints and regulations. But to which philosophical approach does this behavior refers to? Maybe on the first sight it seems to be either the Cultural Relativism
Premium Censorship China Government
Ó Springer 2008 Journal of Business Ethics (2009) 86:143–157 DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9840-y Google in China: A Manager-Friendly Heuristic Model for Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflicts ABSTRACT. Management practitioners and scholars have worked diligently to identify methods for ethical decision making in international contexts. Theoretical frameworks such as Integrative Social Contracts Theory (Donaldson and Dunfee‚ 1994‚ Academy of Management Review 19‚ 252–284) and more recently
Premium Business ethics Ethics Decision making
GOOGLE: PESTEL & Porter’s Five Forces Analysis Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. PESTEL Analysis 2.1 Political 2.2 Economic 2.3 Social 2.4 Technological 2.5 Environmental 2.6 Legal 3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis 3.1 Threat of New Entrants 3.2 Threat of Substitution 3.3 Supplier Power 3.4 Buyer Power 3.5 Industry Rivalry 4. Conclusion & Recommendations 5. References 1.0 Introduction Google Inc‚ a global technology company‚ founded in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin
Premium Google Web search engine Google search
FILL IN FORMAT: Case Analysis Shred Steps 1 & 2: Read the case. Take notes. Chinese language search engine launched in china in 2006 (pg.37) Company was private until 2004‚ Page and Brin decided to conduct a Dutch auction Dutch auction was designed to “democratize IPO share allocation and afford companies and early investors the best price”( pg. 40) Company 5‚680 employees were scattered throughout the world (pg. 41) 2005 positive cash flow of 3.45 billion (pg.41) Revenue of $6.14 billion
Premium Google search Yahoo! Google
Google in China Business Case Analysis Facts of the Case: Key - Stick to the most important facts presented (Point form is expectable ONLY in this section) ▪ Case is based on the negotiation that took place between Google Inc. and the Chinese government to allow their citizens access to Chinese version of Google.com (Google.cn) ▪ Google looking at vast business opportunities in China as a long-term strategy. Due to its population size and market potential‚ China has become an attractive
Premium Google Chinese people Government
Case Study Analysis Template1 Analyst’s Name: ¶ Date: ¶ Case Study Name: ¶Google Inc.‚ in China I. The Pre-Analysis: A. Perspective: A.1. Describe the perspective2 of the author(s) of the case study and the possible biases that might result from that perspective: ¶ The case study is titled Google Inc.‚ In china‚ written by Kirsten E. Martin for the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics. Kirsten Martin is the Assistant Professor of Business and Economics at
Premium Ethics Business ethics
without it. In recent development china and iran have restricted the information flow throughout their country‚ specially china have ban Google-universal search engine and email in its country. Firstly question arises why any country will ban if internet is so useful. There lots of hidden agenda of the govt that has to be protected‚ if there is free flow of information is there public start questioning on the procedures of govt work. Internet censorship in China is among the most stringent in the
Premium Google People's Republic of China Internet