organizational goal‚ it is important to give a single direction to all efforts. It is done by strategy formulation and implementation. Strategy formulation is based on external and internal analysis of organization. These analysis is done by SWOT‚ porter five forces‚ value chain‚ McKinsley Framework and Pestle analysis. These are renowned managerial tools
Premium Management Organization Leadership
Porter’s Five Forces The Threat of New Entrants (Low) There is a great amount of economies of learning and scale in the oil industry for Example BP has been searching for oil since 1901. They invest a huge amount in up-to-date technologies making it difficult for new entrants to compete. His obviously requires huge capital investments in R&D as well as start-up cost‚ for example a truck just to carry the oil costs over $1‚000‚000. There is a lot of regulation in the industry especially with
Premium Investment OPEC Petroleum
2. Procedure 3. British Petroleum 3.1. British Petroleum (BP) 3.2. Background 4. British petroleum SWOT analysis 4.1. What is SWOT analysis? 4.2. Strengths 4.3. Weaknesses 4.4. Opportunities 4.5. Threats 5. BP Porter’s Five Forces Analysis 5.1. What is Porter’s Five Forces Analysis? 5.2. Threat of New Entrants 5.3. Buyer Bargaining Power 5.4. Supplier Bargaining Power 5.5. Threat of Substitutes 5.6. Rivalry 6. Key Success
Premium Photovoltaics Petroleum Strategic management
In “In Case of Emergency: What Not to Do”‚ Peter S. Goodman discusses major flaws of crisis management‚ utilizing the BP oil spill and Toyota’s acceleration malfunctions as examples. Both BP and Toyota suffered a loss in credibility in the eyes of the American public. While this was largely due to the poor manner in which they handled a global crisis‚ the emergence of specific cultural narratives contributed enormously. In America‚ a corporation can be regarded as credible if it is honest‚ trustworthy
Premium Globalization Critical thinking Crisis
British Parliamentary Debate-----Summary of Speakers’ Role in BP Style Opening Government OG1 (Prime Minister) 1. Define 2. Develop case/ state issue 3. Team Split/ Arguments(Usually two) 4. Ending OG2 (Deputy Prime Minister) 1. Rebuttal against OO1 2. Defend your case—if OO1 challenge your stand or definition 3. 1 or more arguments 4. Brief summary as ending for both OG1 & OG2 Opening Opposition OO1 (Leader of Opposition) 1. Accept/ Reject/ Clarify Definition 2. Rebuttals 3.
Premium Westminster system Government Logic
ANNUAL REPORT: BRITISH PETROLEUM (BP) RELEVANT ACCOUNTING RATIOS * LIQUIDITY * EFFICIENCY * PROFITABILITY HORIZONTAL TECHNIQUE - (It provides one with a way to compare your numbers from one period to the next‚ using financial statements from at least two distinct periods.) LIQUIDITY RATIOS * Current Ratios: (Difference between current assets and current liabilities) * Acid – Test Ratios: (Current asset less inventories to current liabilities) CURRENT RATIO Current Ratio
Premium Financial ratio Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet
Title: Do the BPS ethical principles and guidelines place unreasonable constraints upon research? Ethical issues in research and particularly socially sensitive research have predominantly represented a focal paradigm within ’social sciences’; the emotive nature of psychological enquiry in both classical and contemporary investigations has moulded the retroactive response of bodies responsible for overseeing the instigation and application of principles and guidelines envisaged to safeguard
Premium Ethics Science Morality
Banco Popular of Puerto Rico Executive summary Situational analysis Market growth potential and competitive analysis Segmentation‚ target market‚ and positioning Pricing and distribution strategies Marketing communication plan Financial information(including forecasting demand‚ break-even‚ sales‚ promotional budget‚ and marketing expense) Intended marketing objectives for Y1‚ Y2‚ and Y3 Implementation milestones Evaluation and control metrics and methodology to measure
Premium Cuba Investment
behavior‚ some of which were already known. The list also includes instances where standard well-control protocols were not followed” (Kreitner & Kinicki‚ 2013‚ p. 362). In this week’s chapter case study‚ the Deepwater Horizon Disaster was due to the BP and Transocean using the non-rational model of decision making. More specifically‚ these companies unconsciously used Simon’s Normative Model as it relates to bounded rationality which are constraints that restrict rational decision making (Kreitner
Premium Management Employment Organization
why did BP get involved in so much questionable conduct? I think that their main problem when starting the business was money‚ money‚ and money. I’m sure that all they really cared about was making a lot of money; by having “money on the brain” they probably didn’t care about everything else. When they started having problems‚ like the explosion that killed 15 people‚ they didn’t realize that ignoring the little things that caused these problems was going to cost them big time. If BP just took
Premium Petroleum Oil spill Exxon Valdez oil spill