Writing Assignment 1 Singer: All Animals Are Equal Peter Singer‚ a Utilitarian‚ believes in the maximization of happiness of humans and extends this thought to the nonhuman inhabitants of Earth. Singer‚ believes that all animals should be granted moral status‚ similar to that of the human inhabitants. He presents his argument in a modus ponens form. His conclusion of‚ that nonhuman entities should be given the same amount of moral consideration as human entities is reached though his presentation
Premium Utilitarianism Suffering Animal rights
Anacely Gallardo HUM 190 DeCoster 15 December 2014 Peter Singer‚ a well know philosopher‚ notes that “A liberation movement demands an expansion of our moral horizons and an extension or reinterpretation of the basic moral principle of equality.” We‚ humans‚ think that we are superior to others‚ not only to other humans‚ but to other species as well. As the superior race we think we are‚ we tend to use and manipulate animals to our convenience. We play with them and we use them as the subjects in
Premium Human Morality Mammal
The lingering presence of guilt when most folks are presented with a dish that has formed from the basis of an animal seems to have only increased with the mounting knowledge of how a large number of animals are treated‚ whether it is for product testing or for human consumption. The expectation that animals‚ especially those raised in a slaughterhouses‚ live a tranquil‚ cruelty-free life would seem a bit far fetched to me‚ yet it is difficult to deny that the deplorable conditions shown in exploitation
Premium Animal rights
Equal Right for Animals? PHI: 103 Informal Logic Instructor: Courtney Barclay Evan J. McDaniel April 20‚ 2015 Since the first edition of Peter Singer’s book “Animal Liberation” in 1975 the animal rights movement has been a topic of discussion. This movement or the animal liberation movement is an effort designed to protect mammals from being mistreated and regarded as property by humans. Peter Singer is known as a Utilitarian and believes in maximizing individual happiness while minimizing
Premium Animal rights Morality Mammal
It is hard to recognize that “All Animals are Equal” simply because everyone is selfish. People will always promote the survival of their own‚ and have prejudice to a different color‚ or species simply because they want to promote their self interest. Though all the discrimination arguments should be handled through utilitarianism: one life equals one life‚ no matter of species‚ more often than not humans utilize egoism to make their arguments. I believe that Singer is right in his argument because
Premium Morality Human Animal rights
In Peter Singers All Animals Are Equal‚ he claims we should give the same respect the lives of non human animals as we give the lives of humans and that all animals human and non-human are in fact equal. I agree with him because there is no reason as to why animals should not get the same rights and respect as us. Animals have interest‚ when these are similar to ours‚ or their pain is on a similar level why give them less consideration. All human and animals have similar feelings such as loving something
Premium Morality Ethics Human
occur each day on the issues of animal cruelty and human rights‚ but when the issues are put together which will reign over the other? The author Peter Singer of “All Animals are Equal” and “Tools for Research” presents his argument for determining when animal experiments are justified. The author starts his paper with a counter argument‚ questioning if one would be willing to let thousands of people die if those people could be saved by experimentation on a single animal. The answer is a unanimous no;
Premium Human Informed consent Medical research
In order to understand Peter Singer’s article "All Animals Are Equal"‚ one has to look at his viewpoint and perspective. Singer is a utilitarian‚ which is someone who believes that best outcome is something that causes that greatest amount of pleasure (or the least amount of pain) for the greatest number of people. However‚ in this definition the word ’people’ is used‚ as to mean only humans. This is the point that Singer is trying to argue. Who is to say that animals don’t feel pain or experience
Premium Utilitarianism Speciesism Ethics
Animal Liberation In “Animal Liberation” Singer compares the past acts of liberation to animal liberation and how they are not equal. Peter Singer compares women’s rights and black rights to animal rights. Some in which most people think have no comparison at all. Singer expresses how people may not think highly of animal rights because they are not humans. Singer expressed how other sociologist and psychologist view this to be the same way. I mean why not? We test most human things on animals.
Premium Animal rights Tom Regan Speciesism
Many decades ago‚ animal rights was seen as nonexistent to humans. Animals were not considered as important creatures as humans‚ as their existence was solely recognized for human use only. Unfortunately‚ the actions of humans have led to immoral behavior and mistreatment towards animals‚ which have resulted to neglect‚ starvation‚ physical abuse‚ and participation of animal fights for money‚ just to name a few. With help of the formation of Animal Rights group such as PETA‚ created a form of social
Premium Animal rights Animal testing Animal welfare