+ (rm – rf) = 0.04 + (1.5 0.06) = 0.13 = 13% b. Estimate the company cost of capital. rassets = 0.094 = 9.4% c. What is the discount rate for an expansion of the company’s present business? The cost of capital depends on the risk of the project being evaluated. If the risk of the project is similar to the risk of the other assets of the company‚ then theappropriate rate of return is the company cost of capital. Here‚ the appropriatediscount rate is 9.4%. The beta of unleveraged optical
Premium Investment Rate of return Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
of the costs of debt and equity in case Exhibit 8‚which rating category has the lowest overall cost of funds? Do you agree with HudsonBancorp¶s view that equity investors are indifferent to the increases in financial risk acrossthe investment-grade debt categories?There is a general concept that higher rating category willhavethe lowest cost of debt. Butrating categories only give the information about the default risk and loss in case of companydefault. It does not guarantee the lowest cost of capital
Premium Finance Credit rating Interest
what is the firm’s weighted-average cost of capital at various combinations of debt and equity‚ given the fallowing information? Debt/Assets | After-tax Cost of Debt | Cost of Equity | Cost of Capital | 0% | 8% | 12% | 12.00% | 10 | 8 | 12 | 11.60% | 20 | 8 | 12 | 11.20% | 30 | 8 | 13 | 11.50% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 12.00% | 50 | 10 | 15 | 12.50% | 60 | 12 | 16 | 13.60% | b. Construct a pro forma balance sheet that indicates the firm’s optimal capital structure. Compare this balance sheet
Premium Finance
base (initial) cost of each alternative. Here‚ you just need to put in the appropriate RED input from the information in the case study. The answers will be spit out. Which alternative has the lower total cost? Why? Alternative 2 has the lowest total per a procedure cost. Operating costs of Alternative 1 is $86.15‚ which is lower than Alternative 2 of $92.15Alternative 2 is higher in operation al cost because there is six dollars in extra costs assessed with travel and set up costs. When the other
Premium Costs Economics Cost
| NIKE‚ INC.: COST OF CAPITAL | | | | | | Introduction Our report aims to help Kimi Ford make a decision on her investment of Nike. We choose WACC as our method to estimate the cost of capital‚ which can be used as a discount rate to verify whether Nike is correctly valued in current market. We have mainly four steps to calculate WACC: I. Identify the type of cost of capital; II. Figure out the weights of debt and equity; III. Calculate the cost of debt and equity respectively;
Premium Dividend yield Stock Ratio
is overvalued‚ while with a slight decrease in the discount rate‚ to 11.7% the company is undervalued. In order to value the company correctly an accurate cost of capital must be estimated. Analysis An analysis of cost of capital is based on company financials as well as market trends and forecasts. There should only be once cost of capital estimated for the company since so many of its segments share the same general risk and growth factors‚ aside from their non-Nike brand lines. However‚ they
Premium Finance Stock market Financial markets
transaction costs‚ and no costs of financial distress‚ is the following statement true‚ false‚ or uncertain? Moderate borrowing will not increase the required return on a firm’s equity. Explain. MM Proposition II states that higher debt does not affect cost of capital of a firm. The reason is that the lower cost of debt is offset by a greater cost of equity‚ which means investors demand a higher return on equity as a result of the higher risk coming with more debt‚ that holds the firm’s cost of capital
Premium Finance Corporate finance Economics
‘‘Reliable‚ Secure‚ and Wicked Fast’’ 1 6 III. Estimating the Cost of Capital 16 12. ‘‘Best Practices’’ in Estimating the Cost of Capital: Survey and Synthesis 15. Teletech Corporation‚ 1996 16 IV. Capital Budgeting and Resource Allocation 52 19. Diamond Chemicals PLC (A): The Merseyside Project 20. Diamond Chemicals PLC (B): Merseyside and Rotterdam Projects 52 60 39 VI. Management of the Corporate Capital Structure 66 29. Structuring Corporate Financial Policy
Premium Web hosting service Asset Finance
39‚4 Ownership structure‚ capital structure‚ and performance of group affiliation 404 Evidence from Taiwanese group-affiliated firms Received 25 December 2011 Revised 13 September 2012 18 December 2012 Accepted 18 December 2012 Jonchi Shyu Department of Business Administration‚ National Taiwan University of Science and Technology‚ Taiwan‚ Republic of China Abstract Purpose – This study seeks to examine how agency problems and internal capital markets in group-affiliated firms
Premium Capital structure Principal-agent problem Financial ratios
Case 10 Aspeon Sparkling Water‚ Inc. Capital Structure Policy CASE INFORMATION Purpose This case‚ which in all aspects is identical to Case 9‚ illustrates the capital structure decision for a firm that starts with zero debt. Either Case 9 or Case 10‚ but not both‚ should be assigned. The primary analytical tool is valuation analysis‚ although the case briefly introduces the Modigliani and Miller (MM) with corporate taxes and Miller models. The case also illustrates financial
Premium Finance Capital structure Corporate finance