By Christine Murray ©Catholic Online 2004 People have always to determine the role of the free will in life indeed‚ whether they have one at all. As we approach the Catholic feast day of St. Augustine on Aug. 28‚ it is good to examine his writings on the subject‚ especially in Free Choice of the Will. He assumes the will is free and seeks to determine how we choose good or evil. This continues to be “debated” in our age and has great implications on one’s perspective on life. The Catholic
Premium Soul God Metaphysics
Final Project Timothy Gillespie PHI 103 Susan Smith Jan 26 2015 For my final project I have chosen to use the arguments for banning guns. I do not agree with these arguments but‚ I will attempt to address their statements and provide a sound counter argument for each of their points that I discuss. During this final project I hope that I can help shed light on the subject for both sides of the argument and come to a common ground. I believe that is the point of making arguments and
Premium Gun Logic Rifle
According to Christianity‚ God is all good‚ omnipotent‚ omnipresent‚ and omniscient. So‚ why did this good God let there be evil (Augustine 121)? It starts with free will. God gave humans free will to love Him and to do good. According to the Adam and Eve story‚ Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit so that they could be like God. They were prideful and acted in a way that did not live up to their full potential for good and thus‚ there was evil. Now‚ that is not to say that Adam and Eve are
Premium God Good and evil Problem of evil
David Hume was a Scottish philosopher who made the idea of “mitigated skepticism‚” a popular concept in the 18th century. Hume’s mitigated skepticism is an approach for humans to be cautious when approaching reasoning. The term was mainly popularized in an essay written by Hume entitled “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding." Hume traditionally has been regarded as a skeptic in western philosophy. Skepticism is the process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity. Hume
Premium Philosophy Epistemology David Hume
at the same time‚" John Hick. Hick starts out providing a definition of theodicy‚ and contrasting both Augustine and Irenaeus’s theodicy. Theodicy has two conditions: one‚ God is real and is limitlessly good and powerful‚ and two: humans are on a religious experience. Augustine and Irenaeus’s theodicies both depict evil way back to human free will. The point that was different is when Augustine thought that evil were against odds with God’s purpose‚ and Irenaeus considered evil has a precious part
Premium God Good and evil Theology
Abortion Controversy: Should Abortion Be Legal? Marco A. Caban PHI 103 Informal Logic Submitted to Prof. Galen Johnson December 17‚ 2012 Abortion Controversy: Should Abortion Be Legal? Many will argue whether or not abortion it right or wrong‚ moral or immoral‚ ethical or not‚ but one thing that everyone can agree on is that abortion is a very complex issue with very little common ground that keeps many people divided. The topic of abortion is a subject that many different groups have
Premium Abortion Roe v. Wade
There are two main forms of ancient skepticism‚ Academic and Pyrrhonian. The distinction between these two forms of skepticism are‚ Academic profess that knowledge is impossible and that we cannot know things. While Pyrrhonian declares that it’s unknown as to whether knowledge is possible. In fact‚ there are two main schools of Academic skepticism‚ Arcesilaus and Carneades. In Arcesilaus School all its platonic credentials are viewed as something of a combination. Plato in front‚ Pyrrho behind‚
Premium Epistemology Philosophy Scientific method
Cartesian Skepticism to Existentialism The nature of our reality and existence has been a topic of debate since at least the ancient Greeks. Do we exist? Why do we exist? Does it even matter? These are questions I will attempt to address thoroughly. Answers may not be comfortable or satisfactory‚ but it’s better to rip that band-aid off now than continue blindly in the dark. Rationalism and Empiricism have both attempted to prove existence‚ but at their most extremes they fall apart. Using
Premium Existentialism Immanuel Kant René Descartes
two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable. Though this extreme antecedent skepticism can not be
Premium Logic Philosophy Truth
Abstract: Descartes’ Philosophy attempts to undertake the most extreme skepticism possible to prove that we have knowledge through all possible doubt. He attempts to do this by proving the existence of a perfectly perfect God who would not allow us to be deceived by any omniscient deceiver. He uses instrumental skepticism to refute the most extreme type of skepticism. Through the use of the Evil Demon Hypothesis‚ Descartes is able to bring his audience to the most extreme doubt. Once in this
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Scientific method