There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse.” – Socrates‚ Phaedo 89d:2 Wisdom is perfect‚ beautiful and forever absolute – the efficacy of truth‚ regarding any and all subjects and temporal and metaphysical concerns of conscious being‚ does not progressively degrade1; however‚ I believe it is also conversely feasible that one’s comprehension of truth can arguably be perceived to dilute by and within the limitations manifested through the existence and effect of the
Premium Plato Philosophy Reason
Introduction Rene Descartes was born in Lay Haye‚ France on March 31‚ 1596. He was a prized mathematician and philosopher (Cress‚ vii). Descartes published many works on philosophy‚ one of his most famous being Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. This book discusses the nature of human knowledge. He does this by first differentiating skepticism from doubt‚ then he goes through the different steps of doubt‚ and concludes with the idea of the cogito. His philosophy on the nature of
Premium Epistemology René Descartes Metaphysics
DESCARTES’ COGITO ARGUMENT Discourse‚ Part Four‚ pg. 19 – 20 1. Anything that is the slightest bit open to doubt‚ I reject as completely false. 2. My senses sometimes deceive me therefore they are open to doubt. 3. Everything that comes to me through the senses should be rejected as completely false. (1‚ 2) 4. My reasoning‚ like that of any other human being‚ is fallible and therefore open to doubt. 5. All conclusions that I arrive at by using my reasoning should be
Premium Critical thinking Reasoning Logic
Society is flawed. There are critical imbalances in it that cause much of humanity to suffer. In‚ the most interesting work from this past half-semester‚ The Communist Manifesto‚ Karl Marx is reacting to this fact by describing his vision of a perfectly balanced society‚ a communist society. Simply put‚ a communist society is one where all property is held in common. No one person has more than the other‚ but rather everyone shares in the fruits of their labors. Marx is writing of this society
Premium Marxism Communism Working class
people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous‚ wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them‚ therefore‚ making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore‚ unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally‚ Socrates goes on
Premium Plato Philosophy Mind
The most noticeable comparison between Jesus Christ and Socrates was that the charges against them. They were both seen as an “evil” influence to the townspeople because of their different ways to see life and for their beliefs on religion. Jesus was considered a heretic because he preached monotheism in a polytheistic world. He called himself the messiah‚ a divine being and the son of God and the Jews saw that as a major offence. The Roman Government did not like that Jesus questioned the oppressiveness
Premium Plato God Jesus
If God is perfectly good and the source of all that is‚ how is there room for error or falsehood? Descartes attempts to answer this question in Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity. “If I’ve gotten everything in me from God and He hasn’t given me the ability to make errors‚ it doesn’t seem possible for me ever to error. (Descartes‚ Meditation IV: On Truth and Falsity).” The framework of his arguments center on the Great Chain of Being‚ in which God’s perfect goodness is relative to His perfect being
Premium Understanding Metaphysics Knowledge
Epistemology: Meditations on First Philosophy — Skepticism Rene Descartes’ take on epistemology concerns examining his core beliefs and applying the method of skepticism. He examines these beliefs by raising doubts on each of his core principles. He hopes to build a foundation which not even the strongest skeptic can raise a doubt on. Rene also proclaims that should he find anything from his core beliefs to doubt—even the slightest of doubts— he must reject the foundational belief simply because
Premium Epistemology Mind Truth
answer the question of “What is life’s meaning‚” (as Nietzsche suggests)—but for many people religion offers no literal truths. And while religion may slow intellectual progress for some individuals—for instance‚ interpreting the Bible literally can cause one to the theory of evolution—it often does not. Also‚ I acknowledge that a life sans the comforts and joys of religion (and other numbing faculties) does seem appealing. I am not denying Nietzsche the appeal of being perpetually mindful. However‚
Premium Religion Philosophy Meaning of life
"You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way‚ the correct way‚ and the only way‚ it does not exist." ~Friedrich Nietzsche Why‚ but why is everyone so opinionated about practically everything to do with pregnancy and child rearing? Everything is treated like a binary decision - right or wrong‚ no middle ground. The Breast-milk Nazis vs The Formula Fascists‚ while the Controlled Crying Brigade will not even talk to the Instant Attention Army! You risk grievous bodily harm if you offer your
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Childbirth