SANDRA MITCHELL‚ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT VS. FRIDAYS‚ ET AL.‚ DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES CASE NO. 99-CA-201 Case Briefing 1. Parties: Identify the plaintiff and the defendant. a. SANDRA MITCHELL‚ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT b. FRIDAYS‚ ET AL.‚ DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES 2. Facts: Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case. a. On April 11‚ 1996‚ Appellant Sandra Mitchell was having dinner at Appellee Friday’s restaurant. Appellant was eating a fried clam strip when she bit into a hard substance
Premium Appeal Law Civil procedure
Baseball et al. 65 Cal. Rptr. 2d 105(Cal.1997) Facts Plaintiff John Lowe attended a Quakes’ home game in California and his seat was along the left field foul line. During the game‚ the team mascot was playing his antics behind plaintiff and had been touching plaintiff with his tail. Plaintiff was therefore distracted and turned around toward the mascot. After that‚ plaintiff returned his focus on the game but got hit by a foul ball. Plaintiff heavily injured because of the foul ball and then brought
Premium Tort Legal terms Tort law
C.A. No. 299 March 18‚ 1946 FELIX ADAN‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ vs. AGAPITO CASILI and VICTORIA ADAN‚ defendants-appellees. OZAETA‚ J.: The plaintiff Felix Adan commenced this action in the Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur against his sister Victoria Adan and the latter’s husband‚ Agapito Casili‚ to secure the judicial partition of the estate left by their deceased mother‚ Simplicia Nepomuceno‚ alleged to consist of six parcels of land which are specifically described in
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Complaint
2009-CA-1303. Court of Appeal of Louisiana‚ Fourth Circuit. March 31‚ 2010. 1. FACTS: Parody Productions‚ LLC is a company that sale his playing cards over the internet. The product portrays well-known players from a sports team’s history. The plaintiff in this suit‚ Ronald Swoboda‚ is included in the New York Mets Hero Deck. Swoboda claims that he has never given Parody permission to use his image. He further contends that through his attorney he sent Parody a cease and desist letter. Parody refused
Premium Jurisdiction Law United States
Plaintiffs‚ vs. No. HERMAN A. SHULMAN Defendant. MOTION FOR A JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT WHEREFORE‚ the Plaintiffs sue the Defendant and demand a jury to try this case. The Plaintiff should be awarded Twenty-two Thousand Dollars ($22‚000). Both‚ the Plaintiffs and Defendant were residents of Davidson County‚ Tennessee on June 29th‚ 1993. COMES the Plaintiff and sues the Defendant in the amount of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25‚000). The Plaintiff was only
Premium Judgment Civil procedure Plaintiff
OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FORD COUNTY‚ ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING‚ ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) Anheuser Busch Companies‚ Inc. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff‚ Justin King‚ by and through his attorney‚ states as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE Plaintiff‚ for all times mentioned herein‚ was and is a resident of the County of Jackson‚ State of Missouri.
Premium United States Civil procedure Jury
Chandigarh Dated:08.12.2010 (Vinay Kataria) Advocate P-492/1999 Counsel for the petitioner IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE‚ SR. DIVISION‚ CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO._____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS …Defendant Affidavit of Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Late Sh. Rameshwar Dass‚ R/o H.No. 601‚ VPO Hallo Majra‚ U.T. Chandigarh. I‚ the above named deponent do hereby solemnly affirm and declare
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Injunction
married on March 1‚ 1959. Plaintiff had a 15 year old daughter by a previous marriage. It was planned that she would live with them‚ as well as agreed upon that after marriage the defendant’s mother from Hungary would be moved in with them (September 11‚ 1964). Defendant testified that he would not have married plaintiff if his mother could not live with them. Within a very short time after the arrival of the mother-in-law‚ the incompatibility between her and the plaintiff caused a disintegration of
Premium Contract Family Lawsuit
SEATTLE -- In a verdict that could have sweeping consequences for employers and cost Taco Bell Corp. millions of dollars‚ a jury here found the Mexican fast-food chain guilty of intentionally cheating hourly employees out of wages by having them work "off the clock‚" among other things. A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Labor recently reported that off-the-timeclock violations are among the most common complaints against employers by employees. "This judgment sends an important message that
Premium Fast food Jury Class action
Memo Format Date: 3/13/2013 Re: A.16 (pg1223): Cafazzo v. Central Medical Health Services‚ Inc 542 Pa. 526‚ 668 A.2d 521‚1995 (Pennsylvania Supreme Court) Facts Cafazzo (Plaintiff) sued Central Medical Health Services and Physician that did the surgery (Defendants) for product liability for an implanted medical device that failed six years after his surgery in 1986. Cafazzo had surgery for the implantation of a mandibular
Premium Physician Surgery Medicine