court case was to determine whether or not it should be taken into a motion of summary judgement. The plaintiff in the case was Deborah White. White was represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants in this case are Patrick Gibbs; and O’Malley’s Tavern. The representatives of the defendants were Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. Before summarizing the arguments of the plaintiff and the defendant‚ there will be a short summarization of the incident. Mr. and Mrs. White entered
Premium Law Judgment Proximate and ultimate causation
As Facebook expands‚ with 250 million users posting 1 billion pieces of content every week‚ the site continues to draw sharp criticism from privacy advocates‚ lawyers‚ and governments over how it uses the data that members regularly – and often cavalierly – post onto the site. This week five California Facebook users joined the chorus of critics. In a lawsuit filed Monday‚ they charge that Facebook – the Web’s dominant social networking ecosystem – unlawfully used their private information or
Premium Facebook Pleading Social network service
CASE-2 Defendant: - KINGFISHER AIRLINE. Plaintiff: - LATA SIKRI. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I‚ UT Chandigarh (for short the ‘District Forum’) in complaint case No. 603 of 2010 of Lata Sikri vs. Kingfisher Airlines for deficiency in service on the part of the petitioner-Airlines in not issuing the boarding pass to her on a Delhi-Hyderabad flight for which the complainant held confirmed / OK ticket partly allowed the complaint of the complainant with the following directions: From
Premium Indira Gandhi International Airport Plaintiff Kingfisher Airlines
SMC VS NLRC Facts: innovation program was proposed by the petitioner among its employees‚ who will submit to the corporation ideas and suggestions to be beneficial to the corporation. Private respondent‚ Rustico Vega‚ submitted an innovation proposal‚ this was suppose to eliminate certain alleged defects in the quality and taste of the product. However the petitioner rejected the proposal alleging that it is unacceptable. The PR filed a complaint against the petitioner before the regional arbitration
Premium Employment Trade union National Labor Relations Act
books‚ articles‚ newspapers‚ letters. *Monson V. Tussauds- Making and placing of a wax work of the plaintiff near the chamber of horrors was held to be liable. Slander- Spoken. Temporary or audible. Elements I. The allegation must be defamatory. It has to be that the spoken words‚ which are abusive and uttered in a fit of temper are not defamatory *Fields V. Davis- Defendant called the plaintiff‚ a married woman a tram. The reason why this is because abuse is only meant to give vent to ones feelings
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Pleading
years later without transferring the fund to the nephew in addition to the accumulated interest. Plaintiff (nephew) sued Def endant (uncle’s estate) for breach of contract. The court of appeals reversed and agreed that th e judgment of the trial court be affirmed. Contentions of parties: Plaintiff believes that refraining from legal activitie s in a contract counts as a consideration. Plaintiff believes since the re was consideration (refraining from certain Legal activities) and a return
Premium Appeal Law Contract
N.C. 181‚ 204 (N.C. 1979)‚ the courts ruled: “Although we find error in the grounds on which the Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff’s Count Number II‚ we nevertheless affirm the dismissal on other grounds. The requirement that plaintiff in a malicious prosecution action based on a prior civil proceeding show some special damage resulting therefrom‚ as discussed supra‚ is an essential‚ substantive element of the claim.” In Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.‚ 317 N.C. 334‚ 346 S.E
Premium North Carolina Pleading Civil procedure
time that he signed over the deed that this contract should be null and void. The deceased lacked the mental capacity to make this type of decision. Therefore this contract is not legal. Conclusion In this case the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff. It was concluded that the defendant obtained the deceased signature while he was intoxicated which deeply impaired his mental capacity to make such a decision‚ therefore it was ruled a fraudulent
Premium Legal terms Contract law Plaintiff
A Civil Action The movie A Civil Action is focused on describing and explaining what really goes on in a court of law. The case the movie deals with is a small firm going after a national corporation in order to get them to apologize for what they did to the city’s water. It is believed that the company would dump harmful waste such as trichloroethylene into the back of their site where the company was located into a small running river. However‚ the river was connected to the city’s water wells
Premium Lawsuit Ivy League Marxism
party must show a substantial need for the document in preparation for the case. It could be argued there is a substantial need. Scott’s proof chart lays out the events that occurred and evidence available. It would be extremely helpful for the plaintiff to obtain this information to successfully defend themselves. Lastly‚ the party must be unable to obtain the substantial equivalent by other means without undue hardship. The defendant can obtain this information without undue hardship. This information
Premium F. Scott Fitzgerald Plaintiff The Great Gatsby