Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila THIRD DIVISION G.R. No. 81262 August 25‚ 1989 GLOBE MACKAY CABLE AND RADIO CORP.‚ and HERBERT C. HENDRY‚ Petitioners‚ vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and RESTITUTO M. TOBIAS‚ Respondents. CORTES‚ J.: Private respondent Restituto M. Tobias was employed by petitioner Globe Mackay Cable and Radio Corporation (GLOBE MACKAY) in a dual capacity as a purchasing agent and administrative assistant to the engineering operations manager. In 1972
Premium Law Legal terms Tort
three white men. The documentary consisted of good interviews‚ captive images‚ and the information was quality and factual. First‚ the interviews in the documentary were well conducted. The interviews were taken of both blacks and whites‚ as the plaintiff in the court case was black and the defendants were white. Taking two different perspectives on the issue showed the facts and how each side felt and reacted to the crime. These interviews were filmed in many different places‚ including the Byrd
Premium White people Black people Plaintiff
The law places a limit upon the extent to which the defendant is liable for the loss which occurs from his breach of a duty of care to the plaintiff‚ once it is established that the loss sustained by the plaintiff is one recoverable in negligence. The test of remoteness of damage limits this liability by defining certain types of damage or losses as being irrecoverable as a matter of law. The test is carried out to protect the defendant in breach of their obligations from unusual or unexpected claims
Premium Tort law Duty of care Plaintiff
COURT OF JUSTICE MECKLENBURG COUNTYSUPERIOR COURT DIVISION STELLA KING) NO. 14 CVS )) Plaintiff)DEFENDANT’S ANSWER V.)TO PLAINTIFF’S )COMPLAINT DENNIS WOODS) ) Defendant ) _________________________________________ ) I‚ Mariam Qasim‚ being first duly sworn‚ deposes and says: That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law within the State of North Carolina and I am counsel for the Plaintiff named in the above-entitled action pending before the District Court of Brunswick County
Free Service of process Complaint North Carolina
Caleb Duncan 02/17/2011 JULIA M. O’ROURKE‚ Plaintiff‚ Appellee‚ v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE‚ Defendant‚ Appellant. 07-14-1997 Issue: Plaintiff was a fire fighter for the City of Providence from 1992 to June 30‚ 1995. Plaintiff filed a five count complaint asserting hostile work environment and R.I. Gen. Law 28-5-24.1 (Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act); and disparate treatment. She also alleged violation of her equal rights and sought damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Facts: Until
Premium Complaint Plaintiff Defendant
true in count he simply replied "Yes‚ she must play it." Davis lost the case as Branson J. (The Judge) decided that the defendant could be restrained by injunction from breaking the second undertaking but she would not be forced to act for the plaintiff because she could earn a living by doing other work.
Premium Warner Bros. Lawsuit Plaintiff
Abstract In the case of White v. Gibbs‚ the plaintiff‚ Mrs. Debbie White‚ sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act‚ a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd‚ 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states‚ the case was brought to
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff United States
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007 Remedial Law SUMMER REVIEWER 3. Special Proceedings – remedy by which a party seeks to establish a status‚ a right‚ or a particular fact. CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIONS (A) As to nature RULE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Title of the Rules The Rules of Court are not penal statutes. They cannot be given retroactive effect. They can‚ however‚ be made applicable to cases pending at the time of their passage and therefore are retroactive in that sense
Premium Pleading Civil procedure Complaint
trial. The judge grants summary judgment only if there are no disputes as to the material facts of the case and the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law” (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Summary+Judgment) Parties The plaintiff in this case is Mrs. White and attorneys Amanda Babot and Jackson Walsh represent her. The defendant in this case is Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern being represented by Attorneys Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. Mr. Walton is addressing the
Premium Logic Crime Alcoholic beverage
CHINHOYI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING SCIENCE AND FINANCE COMMERCIAL LAW/BUSINESS LAW (CUAC 106‚ CUAC 211): TUTORIAL QUESTIONS (PART 1). Required: Discuss the legal implications of each of the scenarios given below‚ citing relevant decided cases. Case 1 Masiko‚ a solicitor agreed not to demand any fees “until such time as Tapera’s mine was producing and he was on his feet again financially”. When he was sued for fees‚ Tapera advanced
Premium Sales Contract Plaintiff