Case Two Plaintiff: Jane Chambers (Prosecution) Defendant: Giorgio’s Grill (Defense) SUMMARY Jane Chambers‚ filed a personal injury action alleging negligence by the defendant‚ Giorgio’s Grill. She alleges that she slipped and fell on a wet napkin‚ breaking her leg. The defendant denied any negligence. Giorgio’s was a restaurant which became a night club after certain hours. It had a tradition of both the wait staff and customers throwing paper napkins into the air as the music
Premium Tort Civil procedure Plaintiff
Case Research Assessment Baker College Ruiz v. Safeway is a case involving both a Tort; a civil wrong that has caused someone else to suffer harm‚ and negligence also known as professional malpractice; the failure to meet a standard of conduct that is recognized by a profession (Freedictionary‚ 2012). Ruiz v. Safeway was filed by Michael and Lydia Ruiz against Safeway‚ Inc. under business code 25602.1 and it was eventually argued in First Appellate District‚ Division Five‚ Sonoma County
Premium Dictionary Law Plaintiff
Kudler Fine Foods has been in business since the opening of their first store in 1998. From that point the company’s owner Kathy Kudler has been focusing on how to deliver high qualities products that customers will want to continue to purchase. As the text states‚ “Kudler Fine Foods has experienced significant growth and is now focused on expanding the services‚ improving the efficiency of its operations and increasing the consumer purchase cycle as a means to increasing the loyalty and profitability
Premium Plaintiff Food Balance sheet
Hildreth v. Tidewater Equipment Co. Summary John Hildreth was the sole shareholder‚ director‚ and officer HCE‚ Inc‚ a corporation in New Jersey. HCE-NJ began to do business in Maryland in early 1997. According to the Maryland code‚ it is required for foreign corporations to register with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation before doing intrastate business in Maryland‚ and it is required to have a resident agent in Maryland. In February 1998‚ HCE-NJ rented equipment from Tidewater
Premium Corporation United States Virginia
A.C. No. 5955 September 8‚ 2009 JOHN CHRISTEN S. HEGNA‚ Complainant‚ vs. ATTY. GOERING G.C. PADERANGA‚ Respondent. PETITIONER’S (COMPLAINANT) CLAIM: RESPONDENT’S CLAIM: ISSUE/S: is Atty. Paderanga guilty of engaging in dishonest and deceitful conduct? RULING: A.C. No. 5955 September 8‚ 2009 JOHN CHRISTEN S. HEGNA‚ Complainant‚ vs. ATTY. GOERING G.C. PADERANGA‚ Respondent. D E C I S I O N DEL CASTILLO‚ J.: Before this Court is a letter-complaint1 dated
Premium Defendant Prima facie Plaintiff
After I completed both of the Negotiation and Mediation exercises‚ I have came to conclusion and determined that I am definitely better at Mediation. On blackboard‚ you mentioned that it was difficult for you to even resolve the dispute‚ however‚ it did not take me long at all. The “Angry Neighbors” exercise showed two upset neighbors. Jim was upset at the fact that his plants kept dying. Jim is fairly wealthy and spends a lot of money towards plants. However‚ Sonia is not as fortunate and she was
Premium Mediation Dispute resolution Negotiation
employer. The defendant had been employed at a large department store for more than 25 years. Because of her valuable years of experience in accounting with the store‚ she was in charge of accounts receivable at the store. Her previous employer‚ the plaintiff in the case‚ claims that she embezzled $18‚634 three years ago‚ $39‚072 two years ago‚ and $27‚045 last year. You mentioned that you had represented defendants in similar cases in previous years. Your assistance would be invaluable as I prepare
Premium Plaintiff Defendant Complaint
Interview questions & Rule 4 defined Prof. Piquant Kaplan University School of Legal Studies By: Lawrence Pelkey 10 interview questions for the plaintiff 1. Tell me what happened on June 27th ‚ 2014 while driving your Dodge automobile in a northwardly direction on Lebanon road? 2. Did you see another vehicle in your lane on this road on June 27th? If so can you identify the vehicle and did you see the driver? 3. What happen after you spotted the
Premium Appeal Judgment Civil procedure
travelled one Sunil Baran Chowdhury‚ a young man of about 28 years of age‚ a business man from Calcutta‚ who had flown from Calcutta to Nagpur and was taking his journey in that ill-fated Aircraft from Nagpur to Madras at the time of the accident. The plaintiffs in this suit were (1) the widow of the deceased Sunil Baran Chowdhury‚ (2) his minor son and (3) his minor daughter. The widow as the mother of the minors acted as the next friend in the plaint. The Indian Airlines Corporation is the defendant in
Premium Indira Gandhi International Airport Star Alliance Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport
the 1st. Amendment to hide behind‚ but the California Supreme Court ruled it out‚ and that Saderup appeal was overturned. [Cite: No Doubt v. Activision Publishing] Therefore‚ to answer the question‚ yes‚ their decision in ruling in favor of the plaintiff was correct. Cases like these are very sensitive‚ whether it is copyright infringement‚ or anything to do with reproduction of original material‚
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Jurisdiction Court