DUTY OF CARE · Duty of care is to keep children and young people safe and to protect them from sexual‚ physical and emotional harm. Children have a right to be safe and to be treated with respect and dignity. We as adults must take reasonable steps to ensure the safety and well being of pupils. Failure to do this could be regarded as professional neglect. Always act and be seen to act in the child’s best interests. A duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they
Premium Complaint Pleading Plaintiff
2.5 Review the procedures that have been developed against requirements‚ codes of practice and relevant guidance? Stage 1: • Thera staff or managers will listen to your complaint. • Agree with you how to make things better if they can. • Your complaint will be written down on a form and signed. • Within 3 working days you will be told who is looking into your complaint. • Within 28 working days you will be told what has been done about your complaint. Stage 2: If you are not happy with the way your
Premium Complaint Plaintiff Person
Unit 4222-205 Principles of safeguarding and protections in health and social care. 3.3) Identify report into serious failures to protect indivduals from abuse. A report about Castlebeck Care Ltd which failed to ensure that the vulnerable living at Winterbourne View were adequately protected from risk‚ including the risks of unsafe practices by its own staff. Individuals in Winterbourne View which is a home owned by Castlebeck Care Ltd were pinned down‚ slapped‚ doused in cold water and repeatedly
Premium Individual Individual rights Person
WIGBERTO VAZQUEZ Introduction to Law and the Legal System POL-123-CL03 Instructor: Beth Vivaldi Carter K. Libbey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company CDV-03-535 First Judicial District Court of Montana‚ Lewis and Clark County March 14‚ 2005 ■ Procedural History Carter K. Libbey brought this case to court to exclude the defendant’s witness Allan F. Tencer‚ Ph.D.‚ and any exhibits that he had from testifying because his defendant didn’t comply
Premium United States Appeal Civil procedure
Fry’s Electronics The analysis of this paper is the relationship between Llola v. Fry’s Electronics. Llola went to the Fry’s Electronics store to buy some products. The products accrued about $400 dollars. She went to the cashier handing her Fry’s Electronic credit card‚ where she agreed to the contract to pay the $400 on a credit plan. Llola was making monthly payments including interest charges until one day she could not pay for it anymore due to hardship. Fry’s Electronics made several calls
Premium Law Lawsuit Plaintiff
SCHEDULE “A” 1. The Plaintiffs claim from the Defendants: (a) payment of the sum of $25‚000.00; (b) pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the sum of $25‚000.00 calculated pursuant to the Courts of Justice Act‚ R.S.O. 1990‚ c.C43‚ as amended; (c) costs of this action on a substantial indemnity basis; and (d) such further and other relief as this Honourable Court deems just. 2. The Plaintiff‚ Nayan Patel (“Nayan”) is an individual now residing in Barrie‚ Ontario. Nayan
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Depreciation
Is It Really Libel and Defamatory? : Howard K. Stern‚ Plaintiff v. Rita Cosby and Hachette Book Group USA‚ Inc.‚ Defendants A country; particularly the United States‚ legal infrastructure is a key factor in the media ’s ability to fulfill their "watchdog" function. However‚ most of the 1990s had completely lacked a legal base that would allow non-governmental media to defend their newfound abilities to present alternative and often critical points of view. New legal rulings and laws passed
Premium
EN BANC [G.R. No. L-9396. August 16‚ 1956.] MANILA MOTOR COMPANY‚ INC.‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ vs. MANUEL T. FLORES‚ Defendant-Appellant. BENGZON‚ J.: Facts: In May 1954‚ Manila Motor Company filed in the Municipal Court of Manila a complaint to recover from Manuel T. Flores the amount of P1‚047.98 as chattel mortgage installments which fell due in September 1941. Defendant pleaded prescription:chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary 1941 to 1954. The complaint was dismissed. On appeal‚ the Court of
Free Law Civil procedure Appeal
Case name‚ Citation‚ and Court: MARGARET JEAN McBRIDE et al.‚ Plaintiffs and Appellants‚ v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY‚ Defendant and Respondent. 130 Cal. App. 4th 518; 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 287; 2005 Cal. * COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA‚ SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT‚ DIVISION EIGHT Key Facts: * A. Board of Accountancy has a purpose to protect consumers by disciplining certified public accountant that are not meeting the board’s standards. B. The individual appellants
Premium
Case Brief – Extra Credit Citation: SPECTRUM STORES INC‚ Plaintiffs - Appellants v. CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY‚ doing business as Saudi Aramco; Defendants - Appellees. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 632 F.3d 938 (2011) Facts: Gasoline retailers accused the OPEC member nations of fix pricing of crude oil and refined petroleum products in the US. The appellants argued that the district court mischaracterized their complaint as alleging a conspiracy
Premium Petroleum Saudi Arabia United States