Appellees • Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? The plaintiff is Traine Smith. The plaintiffs are Friends Hospital‚ Dewight Magwood‚ Benjamin Messina‚ Ronald Potter‚ Robert Anthony‚ and Dewayne Thomas • What is the issue? The plaintiff sued the defendants‚ claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Pregnancy
Rockport Rebel‚ Inc.‚ “a defendant owes a duty of care to all foreseeable plaintiffs.” Also‚ “the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty to act with care in cases where voluntarily assumes the duty to act by promising to the plaintiff to behave in a certain way‚” the defendant owes that plaintiff a duty to act with
Premium Contract Law Tort
fascinating facts and the intricacies that are inherent in the facts of the case make for a great story. The baseball bat was broken from the outset when it was bought by the plaintiff. Therefore‚ the defendant should have to return the baseball bat and pay the money back to the plaintiff that plaintiff paid for said bat. The plaintiff bought a baseball bat from the defendant and the baseball bat turned out to be broken since as soon as the defendant used the bat to play baseball‚ the bat shattered into
Premium Contract law Implied warranty Baseball
Legal Nurse Consulting: Lesson 4 Neal Bevans Lesson 4: Full-Screen View This view has opened in a new window and will stretch to fit any screen size (large or small). It displays all of this lesson’s components. To return to the normal classroom‚ please click the "close" button or manually close this window. Chapter 1 A Civil Case From Start to Finish In this lesson‚ we will examine a civil case from start to finish‚ and I’ll explain the important steps that all civil cases follow and define
Premium Jury
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Return Date: _______ The Trial Court Complaint Date: 12/10/2013 Probate and Family Court Department COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE PURSUANT TO G.L. c. 208 § 1B Patty Bean‚ Plaintiff V. David Bean‚ Defendant 1) Plaintiff who resides at123 West Golf Road‚ in the city of Boston‚ in the county of Suffolk in the state of Massachusetts‚ 12345 was lawfully married to the defendant who resides at 456 East Lark Street‚ in the city
Premium Massachusetts Boston Rhode Island
v Winadell Pty Ltd (1994) 34 New South Wales Law Reports 723 Parties Musumeci‚ lessee (Plaintiff) Winadell Pty Ltd‚ lessor (Defendant) Date 4 August 1994 Court Supreme Court of New South Wales (NSWSC) Coram Santow J II LITIGATION HISTORY This case is a first instance decision. The plaintiff sought claim for damages‚ and claim for relief against forfeiture. III BRIEF STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS The Plaintiff (Musumeci) leased a fruit market shop from the defendant (Winadell Pty Ltd). Winadell
Premium
– the plaintiff a German company and the defendant an Austrian partnership. On the 18th of December 1990 the plaintiff faxed the defendant with an offer to buy 700-800 metric tons. Meanwhile Austria responded that the ship will be from US for delivery to Belgium and the price is $376 per tone. Additionally a letter of credit was required‚ since both of the parties haven’t seen each other‚ which will guarantee seller that the buyer will be able to perform a payment. In order for the plaintiff to distribute
Premium Contract Natural gas
at the plaintiffs’ MRI and x-rays and he said yes. Then‚ the defense council continued asking if the expert found anything when looking at the plaintiffs’ physicians image examination he used the term “degenerate findings”. The expert reviewed the x-rays
Premium Jury Lawyer Judge
LIABILITY OF EMPLOYER Plaintiff had been employed by a local board of health to construct certain main sewer works. On 19 March 1866‚ the local board gave notice to the owners of certain houses to connect their house drains with the main sewer within 21 days. Before the expiration of the 21 days‚ and during the construction of the sewer the surveyor of the board proposed to plaintiff that he‚ plaintiff‚ should construct the connection between the house drains and the main sewer. Plaintiff said he was willing
Premium Contract Legal terms Debt
SUIT NO:D-22NCC-2117-2010 BETWEEN FOO CHEONG SENG (NRIC No:551210-08-5403) …PLAINTIFF AND ABADI UTAMA GLOBAL SDN BHD …DEFENDANT (Company No: 847474-T) SUMMARY OF DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM The Defendant is owned by one Dato’ Abang Haji Khalid (hereinafter referred to as Dato’ Khalid) and one Eshlie Bin Ahmad Nawawie (hereinafter referred to as Eshlie). The Plaintiff commenced this suit to inter alia claim for the balance purchase price of shares amounting to
Premium Selangor Kuala Lumpur Petaling Jaya