to explain an argument by René Descartes‚ offer what I consider to be the most significant objection to the argument‚ and contemplate how Descartes would reply to that objection. We often assume that philosophy should provide truths obvious to all‚ instead of insights that border upon absurdity to most. But in his college days‚ Descartes “discovered that nothing can be imagined which is too strange or incredible to have been said by some philosopher” (195). Descartes advances his argument by showing
Premium Epistemology Logic Reason
these two great men differ immensely and the foundation for these differences can be found in their distinctive views regarding human nature. Once this is assessed the picture that each man paints of their ideal ruler or founder becomes much clearer. Plato promotes the concept of philosopher-kings who rule over his imagined Utopian society‚ while Machiavelli endorses a ruthless and at times amoral prince whose primary objective is the preservation of the state. Plato’s view of human nature can
Premium Good and evil Virtue Political philosophy
Descartes’ philosophy begins in doubt. The first step towards certainty‚ the Archimedean point from which the whole structure will grow‚ is the discovery of the existence of the self. At the beginning of Meditation II‚ reflecting on the evil genius posited at the end of Meditation I‚ Descartes observes: ‘Let him deceive me as much as he can‚ he will never bring it about that I am nothing so long as I think that I am something… I must finally conclude that this proposition‚ I am‚ I exist‚ is necessarily
Premium René Descartes Mind Philosophy
Descartes’ Argument for the Existence of God Descartes’ Meditations serve as a faithful yet skeptical support for the existence of God. He uses a method of doubt‚ calling all of knowledge into question‚ to pursue a deep level of God and human’s existence. He creates controversial circular reasoning when he creates rules to define the existence of God through the use of the Truth Principle‚ the causal principle‚ and the belief that God is no deceiver‚ which all support one another. To argue the existence
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Epistemology
Connections and Contrasts of Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes | | | | The Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One’s Reason and of Seeking Truth in the Sciences is one of the most influential works in the history of modern philosophy‚ and important to the evolution of natural sciences. In this work‚ Descartes tackles the problem of skepticism. Descartes modified it to account for a truth he found to be incontrovertible. Descartes started his line of reasoning by doubting everything
Premium Scientific method Logic Reasoning
Descartes’ Cogito argument and defective nature doubt are mutually damaging to each other’s respective claims. Defective nature dismisses logic yet Cogito uses it‚ by doing so Descartes contradicts himself‚ falling trap to his own scrutiny. Ruling out his own perception‚ how can Descartes make plausible claims when he doubts his very ability to do so? The reasoning behind Descartes’ doubtfulness is that‚ in essence‚ he wants to know what he can and cannot doubt. If Descartes knows what is doubtable
Premium Truth Epistemology Logic
Plato The Protagoras Penguin Books‚ 2005‚ pages 15-30 In this extract‚ Plato presents the sophist !i.e.‚ professional philosopher" Protagoras talking with Socrates about how people become good. The extract contains a theory of moral education‚ and a theory of punishment. But most importantly‚ it is a discussion of the principles of democracy. The view that Socrates puts forward‚ and that Protagoras endorses and explains # that ethical competence is a non-technical matter‚ and a universal human
Free English-language films 2007 singles Plato
Daniel Haynes April 22‚ 2013 Euthyphro – Plato Explain how the concept of holiness emerges in the dialogue and why it takes a prominent position in the conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro. “Euthyphro answers that there is no difference of opinion‚ either among gods or men‚ as to the
Premium Truth Plato Euthyphro
The philosophers Zara Yacob‚ a seventeenth-century Ethiopian philosopher‚ and René Descartes‚ a seventeenth-century French philosopher‚ mathematician‚ and scientist‚ were two very important religious intellectuals of their time. Yacob and Descartes were similar in many ways despite never meeting but also differed considerably in that they both believed in God but arrived at that conclusion in very different ways. They also had profoundly different ways of thinking. The two extraordinary philosophers
Premium Religion Philosophy God
According to Plato a property that is abstract or quality is considered a form; if you were to take a property of a certain object and separate the property from the object‚ that itself would contemplate a form. A basketball could be taken for example here where you can take the roundness of the object being the basketball in this case and separate the roundness from all of the other properties the basketball has like the weight and the color‚ focusing only of the roundness would be the form of
Premium Ontology Aristotle Plato