Cola Wars Continue : Coke and Pepsi in 2006 1. Why historically has the soft drink industry been so profitable? * High rate of consumption increasing at an average of 3% per year * Increasing availability of CSDs * Introduction of diet and flavoured varieties Year | 1970 | 1975 | 1981 | 1985 | 1990 | 1994 | 1996 | 1998 | 2004 | Consumption in Cases (million) | 3090 | 3780 | 5180 | 6500 | 7780 | 8710 | 9290 | 9880 | 10240 | 2. Compare the economics of concentrated
Premium Pepsi Bottle Coca-Cola
1. 5(+1) Porter‘s forces. | |The threat of substitutes | | |Food retail industry at first seems easy to substitute‚ but in truth the large markets are the ones who state the prices in the market‚ | | |thus for such large chains like Tesco the threat of substitutes is low as due to high demand it manages to offer high quality products at | | |low costs. Moreover
Premium Retailing Marketing Cost
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 1. Why is the soft drink industry so profitable? In an industry dominated by two heavyweight contenders‚ Coke and Pepsi‚ in fact‚ between 1996 and 2004 per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) remained between 52 to 54 gallons per year. Consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades. Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSD‚ the introduction of diet and flavored varieties‚ and brand extensions
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Pepsi
representative offices in the U.S. As part of their strategy to improve customer alignment; this enables them to better respond to the needs of their customers in a timely and efficient manner. Michael Porter’s Five Forces Analysis In the industry LG Display operates‚ Michael Porter’s Five Forces Analysis is crucial in assessing the state of competition. The Bargaining Power of Buyers The bargaining power of buyers is moderate. There aren’t many companies that offer the same quality of products
Premium Liquid crystal display Supply chain management Customer service
Case Memo 1 Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola have a long history of intense competition since 1950. Besides the CSD (carbonated soft drink) consumption rise‚ it brought both Coke and Pepsi enjoyed significant revenue growth. In 2004‚ CSD has 52.3% of total US Liquid Consumption. Coke and Pepsi had 22.1% and 14.4% in Net profit/sales respectively. There are four major participants involved in the production and distribution of CSDs: 1. Concentrate Producers
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Soft drink
PORTERS 5 FORCES. DEFINITION OF ’PORTER’S 5 FORCES’ Named after Michael E. Porter‚ this model identifies and analyzes 5 competitive forces that shape every industry‚ and helps determine an industry’s weaknesses and strengths. 1. Competition in the industry 2. Potential of new entrants into industry 3. Power of suppliers 4. Power of customers 5. Threat of substitute products The Porter’s Five Forces tool is a simple but powerful tool for understanding where power lies in a business situation. This
Premium Pricing Marketing
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 CSD Industry Overview Coke and Pepsi‚ the two main players in the duopoly market‚ have benefited from average growth of 3% since 1970 in the CSD market. There are many substitutes to CSD’s such as; milk‚ coffee‚ bottled water‚ beer‚ juices‚ tea‚ wine‚ sports drinks‚ and tap water yet American’s drank more soda than any other beverage. Coke and Pepsi competed fiercely for market share and this competition built brand recognition for both companies. Continuous
Premium Pepsi Profit Brand
THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DISTRIBUTION OF PROFIT FROM INNOVATION IS; First - the industry evolution‚ in the early stages of an industry‚ a variety of products solution maybe introduced with no clear leader. And once the market chooses the winning set of product characteristics‚ less design heterogeneity is possible and the competition becomes more prices based. The early phase often amounts to standard competition (David and Greenstein‚ 1990). The second factor is the appropriability-
Premium Food Supply chain Value chain
McDonalds using a well known model to assess the competitive position that it occupies within its industry Laudon & Laudon (2006) claim that the most widely used model for understanding competitive advantage is a model known as “Porter’s Competitive Forces Model”. To assess competitive position using this model we must consider traditional competitors‚ the possibility of new market entrants‚ availability of substitute suppliers‚ similar products available in the market and the customers of an organisation
Premium Nutrition Fast food Brand
Conclusion of primary research Analysis of primary research 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Profile of manager and business 2.2 Analysis of questionnaire finding 2.3 Conclusion Theory regarding porters 5 forces framework 3.0 Introduction 3.1 Porters five forces diagram 3.2 Analysis of Porters five forces 3.3 Past analysis of Ryanair 3.4 Conclusion Application of SWOT analysis 4.0 Introduction 4.1 SWOT analysis for Ryanair 4.2 SWOT analysis for Aerlingus 4.3 Conclusion Appendices
Premium Management Leadership Airline