Judicial Appointments For Fast Track Courts 2002 Under Article 139 - A of the Constitution of India 06.05.2002 Brij Mohan Lal Vs. Union of India and Other s With T.C. (C) No. 23 / 2001. SLP (C) No. 7870.10645 of 2001 and T.P. (C) No. 407 - 410 of 2001 Case Summary A case relating to the establishment and functioning of Fast Track Courts‚ which came into existence for the speedy disposal of long pending Sessions cases. The Eleventh Finance Commission allocated Rs.502.90 crores under the
Premium Judge Bench
The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis which means ‘to stand by what has been decided’. It is a common law principle whereby judges are bound to follow previous decisions in cases where the material facts are sufficiently similar and the earlier decision was made in a court above the current one in the court hierarchy. This doctrine of precedent is extremely strong in English law as it ensures fairness and consistency and it highlights the importance of case
Premium Common law Stare decisis Law
on the grounds of experience and fitness and then presents a precise list to the Texas governor who then makes the appointment. This process will necessitate for fairness and overall competence in service delivery. The reasons why this system is deemed fit are: • This criterion of judge selection through the relevant commission boosts the independence of the judicial arm of the government through an elimination of the partisan politics‚ political sponsorship as well as the influence of money when
Premium Supreme court Judge Court
preserve the neutrality of judges and govern overt manifestations of judicial preference‚ whilst also protecting the judiciary from condemnation following any decisions they make . In addition to the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act‚ a substantial degree of security of tenure and remuneration‚ for instance‚ reducing a sense of fear within the judiciary. Tenure prevents judges from being removed from office on the basis of their judicial decisions‚ allowing them to perform their duties independently without
Premium Law Judge Separation of powers
University of London Common Law Reasoning and Institutions Essay Title: ‘Judicial precedent is best understood as a practice of the courts and not as a set of binding rules. As a practice it could be refined or changed by the courts as they wish.’ Student Number: 090500532 Candidate Number:L8000 The declaratory theory of English common law is that the function of the judge is to declare what has always been the correct legal position at common law. In carrying out this task
Free Common law Law
The judicial branch of government interprets laws and administers justice. The judicial branch of government was established by Article lll of the Constitution along with other Federal courts created by Congress. This branch came about when statesmen who met in Philadelphia were followers of Montesquieu’s concept that powers in politics should be balanced. John Locke’s writings supported and made this principle stronger‚ this led to the judgment that there needed to be three equal branches of government
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
There is too much stuff found now days about deaths and torture in police and judicial custody in newspapers which diverts us to think that whether basic fundamental rights of an individual are being protected and safeguarded even when he is in police or judicial custody. As a human‚ every individual has certain rights and as these Human Rights are part and parcel of human dignity‚ they need to be protected by either Constitution of a country or by effective legislations in cases of arrest and detentions
Premium Crime Police Capital punishment
power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected
Premium United States Constitution United States Law
United states created the Judicial Branch of government‚ which the Supreme Court represents. It has grown from six justices to nine‚ which include one chief justice and eight associates who are appointed for a lifetime term by the president of the United States.At the Constitutional Convention of 1787‚ the delegates shared a commitment to an independent judiciary. They agreed that an indispensable part of any well-organized republican government was a separate and co-equal judicial branch that would serve
Premium United States Constitution United States Law
objectives and is tailored to each company’s specific business and job classification. When Codes are violated‚ disciplinary action should be taken. In this article from the Alaska Dispatch News‚ a judge has been accused of violating the Alaska Code of Judicial Conduct for insensitive statements. Within this Code is a very detailed listing of a judge’s‚ duties and responsibilities. Under Canon 3 of this
Premium Ethics Business ethics Morality