"Posc 340 judicial process" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 4 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial decisions

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judicial Decisions.The effective law making process of modern Malaysia Table of Content Introduction Malaysian Judiciary Judiciary Administration Law Making Process … … Conclusion Introduction History of Malaysian Law Different countries practices difference types of legal system. Some country practices one type of legal system while other practices the mixed legal system which means a combination of two or more legal systems. Malaysia for example‚ practices the mixed legal system which

    Free Separation of powers Law

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    USU 1300 Is Judicial Activism in the best interest of the American people? Suzanna Sherry reminds us in her working paper‚ Why We Need More Judicial Activism‚ that “an examination of constitutional practice shows that too little activism produces worse consequences than does too much” and since we cannot assure judges are consistently “fair” it is better to be overly aggressive than overly restrained. In the most basic sense‚ judicial activism is when judges apply their own political opinion in

    Premium

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial precedent

    • 1316 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Precedent is another important source of law‚ it is an independent source of law‚ where there are no legislations on the particular point in statute Books‚ and Judicial Precedent works great. Judicial precedent has been accepted as one of the important sources of law in most of the legal systems. It is also a continuous‚ growing source of law. According to Salmond‚ the doctrine of precedent has two meanings‚ namely (1) in a loose sense precedent includes merely reported case-law which may

    Free Common law Precedent Law

    • 1316 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Review

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The area of law in which this question is concerned is judicial review. Judicial review can be defined as ‘… the means by which the Courts control the exercise of Governmental powers.’ The Courts will look at the way in which a decision was made‚ not the decision itself‚ to find out if any powers have been abused. Judicial review is an application to the Courts to assess an action or decision made by a public body on a point of public law. A particular decision may be found to be in breach of natural

    Premium Law

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Department

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ARTICLE VIII JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Section 1. The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law. Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable‚ and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government. Section

    Free Law Judge Jury

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    THE DOCTRINE OF BINDING PRECEDENT INTRODUCTION The doctrine of binding precedent means the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. The doctrine of judicial precedent involves an application of the principle of stare decisis i.e.‚ to stand by the decided. In practice‚ this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. This provides consistency and predictability in the

    Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent is the process whereby judges follow previously decided cases where the facts or point of law are sufficiently similar. It involves the following principles: First‚ stare decisis‚ which means to stand by the decided‚ whereby lower courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases and appellate courts follow their own previous decisions. For example: The High Court must follow decisions of the Court of Appeal

    Premium Stare decisis Case law Precedent

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Accountability

    • 5237 Words
    • 21 Pages

    1ST INTRA STATE CONFERENCE ON "VISTA OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW" TEAM CODE: T34 JUDICIAL ACCOUNABILITY: A FACET OF REALITY ABSTRACT: “Judiciary unlimited” is an unelected judiciary which is not accountable to anyone except itself. Today Judiciary has marginalised the Indian Government. The Supreme Court has its own laws and ways of interpretation with implementation. The issue is not whether something justifiable has come out of all this but whether the Courts have arrogated vast and uncontrolled

    Free Law Separation of powers Judge

    • 5237 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial activism is gaining prominence in the present days. In the form of Public Interest Litigation (PIL)‚ citizens are getting access to justice. Judiciary has become the centre of controversy‚ in the recent past‚ on account of the sudden (Me in the level of judicial intervention. The area of judicial intervention has been steadily expanding through the device of public interest litigation. The judiciary has shed its pro-status-quo approach and taken upon itself the duty to enforce the basic

    Free Law Judge Court

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    practiced. I noticed that the judicial branch usually restrain themselves from involving in critical civil policy‚ but will be active when the time comes when the general public‚ in which the case is decided‚ feels a change is needed. We have enough evidence to see how our judicial branch should act. Should the judicial branch be more active towards shaping American policy or restrain as long as possible before being forced to act upon very critical civil policies? Judicial activism is the view that

    Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50