THE HART-FULLER DEBATE It is important to consider‚ howbeit briefly‚ the academic exchanges between the proponents of legal positivism as represented by H.L.A. Hart and those of the natural law school represented by Lon Fuller. The gravamen of such academic discourse‚ usually tagged Hart-Fuller debate is to be found in the Harvard Law Review 1958. Curzon identifies the background of the debate as the atrocities committed by Germany during the 2nd World War. Under the National-Socialist regime
Premium Law Jurisprudence
NATURAL LAW – DUTY TO OBEY UNJUST LAWS Important aspects of natural law can be traced back to Aristotle‚ Plato and the stories of Sophocles‚ Antigone & Oedipus. They offered arguments for the existence of a higher form of law‚ a set of standards against which existing legal norms can be compared and judged. Plato argued that individual objects (e.g. individual trees and chairs and individual instances of equality or beauty) were imperfect reflections or instances of an eternal Idea or Form
Premium Law Natural law Jurisprudence
&operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0263-323X JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY VOLUME 14‚NUMBER 3. AUTUMN 1987 0263-323X $3.00. Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism: Two Sides of the Same Practical Coin? TIM KAYE* INTRODUCTION In their article "The Practical Difference between Natural-Law Theory and Legal Positivism"‚ ’ Deryck Beyleveld and Roger Brownsword have maintained that if the continuing debate between legal positivists and natural lawyers is ever to get beyond misrepresentation
Premium Law Natural law Jurisprudence
Hart’s Concept of Law: Positivist Legal Theory or Sociology? Glen Wright This paper will consider the extent to which HLA Hart can be said to have turned the positivist tradition of legal thought from positivism to a sociology of law. Hart ’s claim to be engaging in ’descriptive sociology ’ is first considered‚ followed by the submission that Hart ’s gesture towards natural law is distinctly sociological. The significance of the ‘critical reflective attitude’ is then discussed and‚ finally‚ the
Premium Jurisprudence Sociology Ronald Dworkin
My Concept of Law – what do you think is the best descriptive concept of law‚ what do you think is the purpose or value of law? Have your views changed over this semester‚ if so how?" Most people’s concept of law is limited‚ their view on law is commonly based on a set of rules which they do not want to break because of either fear of a bad image in society as well as fear of being penalized and incarcerated legally. This point was emphasised by the legal philosopher John Austin whose theory on law
Premium Natural law Jurisprudence Law
continuously increases the interconnectedness of individuals; the effects of globalisation is a conspicuous fact. Yet‚ it’s critical relevancy to legal field has not yet sufficiently recognised by legal scholars due to the domination of eurocentric positivism for more than two hundred years. While in
Premium Natural law Law Jurisprudence
religious language is meaningful and full of purpose while others see it to being pointless. The first assertion of the meaningless of religious language is the school of philosophical thought known as Logical positivism. Friedrich Waismann who was a member of the Vienna Circle. Logical positivism he saw as the belief that “Anyone saying a sentence must know under what conditions he calls it true‚ and under what conditions he calls it false. If he is unable to state these conditions‚ he does not know
Premium Empiricism Scientific method Philosophy of science
several jurists such as John Stuart Mill and David Hume take the view that it is a great naturalistic fallacy to deduce an ‘ought’ from an ‘is’. Mill argues that the duty of man is not to follow nature‚ but to amend it. DEFINITION OF POSITIVIST Positivism refers
Premium Natural law Law South Africa
taste‚ touch and smell even real? There are arguments against the study of metaphysics. They contend that actual metaphysical knowledge cannot be gained. The two main arguments against metaphysics are Kant ’s "Copernican Revolution" and logical positivism. Both of the arguments placed against metaphysics hold to some form of the argument that metaphysical knowledge cannot truly be gained. Kant
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Mind
clarify his reasoning of legal positivism. There are three main foundations to legal positivism to understand if a law is just or not. The first foundation is that law must be separated from morality. When trying to understand a law one must separate their own ideas of what the law is from what the law ought to be. Having people bring there own morals into understanding laws will make the laws unjust when applied to the people. The second foundation of legal positivism is the command theory where
Premium Law Natural law Political philosophy