The Law in Wartime: A Legal Theory Approach to Executive Order 9066 While they were never as atrocious as German concentration camps‚ internment camps in America remain one of the most significant violations of basic rights in American history. This paper will be focused on Executive Order 9066‚ which was signed by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in February 1942 and allowed for this internment. The Executive Order essentially granted many powers to the Secretary of War‚ the biggest of which
Premium World War II Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler
statistics which are objective and can’t be manipulated; statistics on births and marriages are hard statistics. Soft statistics which are more subjective are easy to manipulate; statistics on crime‚ poverty and unemployment are soft statistics. Positivists favour Official Statistics as they take a scientific approach by using standardised research methods to get the quantitave data which allows them to make generalisations. Official statistics are delivered on a large scale and this is another
Premium Scientific method Sociology Research
then go onto examine various perspectives and theories surrounding the subject heading. Sociologists such as Durkheim‚ Comte and Weber will be examined. This paper is intended as an overview of two different schools of thought‚ those of positivist and anti-positivist approaches I will outline the main principals for each Sociologist covered. I will then give my personal views on the question‚ and attempt to answer it within my conclusion. Firstly‚ in order to examine the essay title it must
Premium
not be a science”. To what extent do sociological arguments and evidence support this view? This statement‚ stating that sociology is not a science‚ is debated throughout sociology by two theoretical positions; positivism and interpretivism. The Positivist theory is based on the idea that explanations for events or people should be based on empirical scientific methods. They see the world as full of testable realities and use quantitative methods to try and support their theories. However‚ the Interpretivist
Free Scientific method Sociology Social sciences
criminology: the classical school and the positivist school. Cesare Beccaria‚ “one of the first scholars to develop [an] understanding of why people commit crime‚” is a notable theorist whose theories lead to the development of the classical school‚ which focused more on the individual and the belief that only that individual was responsible for their actions‚ not that an outside source could have influenced their behaviour (Siegel 9). The positivist school believes “that heredity can make criminal
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal justice
of people‚ therefore quantitative methods would be used. Quantitative methods involve reliability and are more practical as they take less time‚ require less commitment from the researcher and are cheaper. Quantitative methods are mostly used by Positivists‚ as they like to compare and statistics. However‚ topics such as Bullying cannot be studied with quantitative methods. It would involve qualitative research‚ because it is a detailed topic‚ which allows a deeper‚ and a valid relationship. Qualitative
Premium Scientific method Sociology Quantitative research
sociologists‚ mainly Positivist sociologists‚ choose to use structured interviews when conducting research. Positivists are mainly interested in research methods that achieve their main goals of reliability‚ generalisability and representativeness‚ for this reason‚ they favour structured interviews as they achieve these goals. This is because structured interviews often have questions and answers that are standardised; they are reliable because they can be therefore replicated. Positivist sociologists
Free Interview Semi-structured interview Quantitative research
or that which can be experienced by the senses). Positivists reject any evidence that cannot be objectively experienced or observed such as that derived from tradition‚ faith‚ magic‚ religion‚ philosophy or any other form of knowledge or belief that does not have an empirical basis. Thus they want to explain criminal behaviour by reference to causes that can be observed or measured. Causes have to be material and observable – biological positivists look at biological observables such as anatomical
Premium Scientific method Science Empiricism
NATURAL AND POSITIVE LAW When it comes down to the law‚ you either have a Naturalist view‚ a Positivists view‚ or both. When coming down to what is the right decision as an individual or as a society‚ there will always be different solutions and opinions as to what is the common sense decision. As an individual going through cases such as Oka‚ Latimer‚ Kevorkian‚ and Freedom Riders‚ there is a line that one should not cross but also a line that should be questioned. Every case initiates different
Premium Law Ethics Morality
ofbeing a realist.The realistic slant of positivism is also known as determinism.The positivist knows that a reality is "out there" to be defined and categorized.The hard sciences from the time of Newton and Decartes have traditionally relied on the positivistic approach.The positivist hopes to be able to approximate "reality" in a detailed generalization or theory on how reality operates.The theories of a positivist generallytake the form of cause and effect laws describing the outside reality.Robert
Premium Sociology Scientific method Social sciences