CHAPTER 1 APPLICATION OF THE RULES GENERALLY INDEX I. II. Introduction The Hague Rules 1) 2) III. The general principle of application Paramount clauses and the Hague Rules The Visby Rules 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) A brief history of the Visby Rules Hague/Visby Rules - a single document Visby Rules - force of law Paramount clause - Visby Rules Extent of application - Visby Rules IV. The Hague and Hague/Visby Rules 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) Contracts of common and private
Premium Commercial item transport and distribution Contract Contract law
Table of contents Table of Cases 1. Kopitoff v Wilson (1876) 1 QBD 337. 2. India v West Coast Steamship Co [1963] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 278. Table of Statues 1. The Hague Rules 2. The Hague-Visby Rules 3. The Hamburg Rules 4. The Rotterdam Rules Commentary on the Rotterdam Rules Ⅰ Introduction: Background of the Rotterdam Rules It is known for quite a long time that there are no international conventions
Premium Law of the sea Law Transport
By use of examples‚ explain how an agreement recognized by the law of contract Law of contract is body of legal rules governing the conclusion and consequences of contract. Contract is an agreement based on consensus between legal subjects with contractual capacity. Which is legal‚ physically possible and complies with the prescribed formalities and which is reached with the intension of creating a legal obligation with resultant rights and duties? 1. Consideration It’s the price paid by
Premium Contract Law Gentlemen's agreement
To be able to thoroughly discuss exclusionary rule‚ there has to be some sort of basic knowledge of what it is. Exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This paper will be discussing how exclusionary rule first came about and how it has evolved into what it is now. So this paper will‚ in a way‚ be a timeline of the exclusionary rule. Exclusionary rule was first discussed in the case of Boyd v. US (1886). Boyd v. US (1886) was about trying
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Exclusionary rule United States Constitution
COMMERCIAL TENANCY LAW IN AUSTRALIA AJ BRADBROOK CE CROFT BUTTERWORTHS (1990) [1.04] the doubt which has been created results from a series of English decisions given in the course of the 1950s and 1960s. In 1952 Denning LJ (as he then was)‚ expressed the view that the test of exclusive possession was by no means decisive: Errington v Errington [1952] 1 All ER 149 at 297; [1952] 1 KB 290. His Lordship said that the difference between a tenancy and
Premium Law Common law Property
Arizona v. United States is whether federal immigration laws preclude Arizona’s cooperative law enforcement efforts and implicitly preempt provisions of Arizona’s immigration law (S.B. 1070). My team and I believe that S.B. 1070 violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution‚ which makes federal law the “supreme law of the land.” As such‚ S.B. 1070 unconstitutionally intrudes on the federal government’s authority to regulate immigration law and should therefore be nullified. Defining Preemption
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
The One-Drop Rule: A Key Player in the Construction of Race in the United States Barack Obama’s election as the President of the United States in 2008 was considered by many to be a representation of the huge strides the country has made in terms of race relations. Considering that blacks in America were denied civil rights less than five decades ago‚ his election certainly indicates that progress has been made. Obama and his election to office is linked to this progress because much of the population
Premium United States World War II Olympic Games
Flies – Rules‚ Laws and Custom In a functioning society‚ laws are necessary to govern behaviour and make equal opportunities for everyone. The movie Lord of the Flies clearly exemplifies the need for laws and how laws must be enforced t be effective. Without laws anarchy would surely ensue as explored through “Lord of the Flies”. Anarchy is the state of disorder due to a poor system of law or poor enforcement of the law‚ in Lord of the Flies Ralph‚ who was the ‘leader’ creates a set of laws without
Premium Law Murder International law
Golden Rule Of Interpretation-Comparision Between English Law And Indian Law INTRODUCTION The golden rule is that the words of a statute must prima facie be given their ordinary meaning. It is yet another rule of construction that when the words of the statute are clear‚ plain and unambiguous‚ then the courts are bound to give effect to that meaning‚ irrespective of the consequences. It is said that the words themselves best declare the intention of the law-giver. In law‚ the Golden
Premium
Court of Appeals of Ohio‚First District‚ Hamilton County. NADEL et al.‚ Appellants‚ v. BURGER KING CORPORATION et al.‚ Appellees. No. C-960489. Decided: May 21‚ 1997 Edward J. Felson and Stephen R. Felson‚ Cincinnati‚ for appellants. Jonathan P. Saxton‚ Cincinnati‚ for appellee Burger King Corporation. Droder & Miller Co.‚ L.P.A.‚ A. Dennis Miller and Kevin J. Ryan‚ Cincinnati‚ for appellee Emil‚ Inc. I. Facts On a morning in early December 1993‚ plaintiff-appellant Paul Nadel was driving
Premium