William Shakespeare’s play ‘King Richard III’ and Al Pacino’s 1996 doco-drama film ‘Looking for Richard’ reveals the explicit relationships between each text and their respective audience. The Elizabethan and twentieth century contexts in each of these texts are important as it demonstrates the value of each text and enables the understanding of how the film enriches the ideas presented in the play. Shakespeare’s ‘King Richard III’ portrays a malicious and corrupted Richard to explore the themes of divine
Premium William Shakespeare Elizabethan era Morality
between Shakespeare’s Richard III and Al Pacino’s Looking for Richard the values of the era are often a product of the context of the text. However‚ through studying the theatricality of man and the pursuit of power‚ it is clear these notions transcend time and context. Shakespeare valued the way an actor could act within a play and theatre was valued in this context. Shakespeare also demonstrated how Richard pursued political power‚ whilst Shakespeare himself pursued cultural power. Similarly‚ Pacino
Premium Actor Al Pacino William Shakespeare
‘Shakespeare’s Richard III offers insights into the contextual concerns and values of Elizabethan England’ discuss the above statement with close reference to the play KR3 Context and values reside within any text‚ and are inevitable whether the text is composed reluctantly or purposely to communicate them. Richard III exerts an overwhelming insight into Elizabethan England context‚ and the values they upheld. A better understanding of context is evident through the values that derive and are
Premium Elizabethan era Elizabeth I of England Francis Drake
Throughout my comparative study of texts and context‚ I have explored various connections shared between William Shakespeare’s ‘Richard the 3rd’ and Al Pacino’s ‘Looking for Richard’. As both of these items are based on the same character‚ King Richard the 3rd‚ they share a lot in common. The connection that I have chosen to concentrate on though is the idea of power‚ and how both texts explore this theme. William Shakespeare is an extremely famous English poet and playwright and widely
Premium
1946). In politics‚ politicians use their language skills as a power tool to swipe away their competitors and to gain the support of the commoners on a regular basis. When government budgets disappear‚ MPs would often blame others. One would doubt that Rob Ford would still be in the Toronto mayoral race if he did not have strong language skills to get him out of his drug and assault accusations. In the setting of King Richard III‚ the power of political language is no different than today. Royals and
Premium Richard III of England Persuasion Tower of London
Richard III is a play by William Shakespeare‚ that tells the story of the ill minded King Richard whose lust for power ultimately led to his unfortunate demise. Richard III seems to be very self conscious and depressed about his deformities. Richard is willing to commit murder and treachery without a second thought. He is a skilled manipulator and can convince almost anyone to do his will. Richard III seems to be very self conscious and ashamed about his deformity‚ and feels that he is being punished
Premium William Shakespeare Murder English-language films
King Richard III by William Shakespeare Shakespeare’s King Richard III (1592) is the last historical play of his tetralogy including the three parts of King Henry VI . T he plays depict the collapse of English control over parts of France and the bitter and fierce internal struggles between the Houses of Lancaster and York in the fight to gain the crown of England. King Richard III is regarded (Hume 202) as a piece of prop aganda support ing the Tudor monarchs who succeeded Richard
Premium Edward IV of England Richard III of England Henry VI of England
In December 1483 the bodies of Prince Richard and Prince Henry‚ only 12 and 9‚ were found murdered in the Tower of London. The mystery of who killed the boys is still a mystery to this day‚ however many suspect their uncle Richard III of York. Many historians who recorded the event explicitly express that they’re certain Richard III is responsible‚ and there’s many valid reasons to support their assumption. Richard III grew up with many siblings which included three older brothers. He was the runt
Premium Henry VII of England Richard III of England Edward IV of England
Loncraine’s 1995 film of Shakespeare’s Richard III play‚ while considerably altered to fit in with the context of the industrial 1930’s timeframe‚ still retains the values and themes of Shakespeare’s Richard III play such as Richard’s rampant thirst for power‚ the familiar good versus evil theme and influence of persuasive language‚ otherwise known as propaganda. Richard is portrayed as a Hitler figure in the film using similar colours and uniform to the Nazis. The key distinction between the
Premium William Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet First Folio
it. This is Shakespeare’s critique of Machiavelli‚ using Richard III as his example. King Richard III was not next in line to acquire kingship in England‚ but through certain Machiavellian actions‚ such as appearing religious‚ marriage and eliminating others‚ Richard quickly became the King of England. Although these actions may have helped him achieve the kingship‚ they did not however help him in maintaining it. Shakespeare’s use of Richard succeeding then failing is a clear critique of his views
Premium Prince Monarchy Richard III of England