Proposal for Nike Dri-FIT Market Research Prepared for: Alison Dean June 14‚ 2009 Table of Content Executive Summary Background Problem Definition Research Design Fieldwork Data Collection Data Analysis Reporting Timing Appendices Executive Summary This proposal responds to your brief of June 15 2009 and describes: Business Objective: – to change‚ reinvigorate or phase out the Dri-FIT range of products Research Objective: – to assess if consumers are aware
Premium Scientific method Qualitative research Focus group
Edward Jones Portfolio Challenge Investment Policy Statement For Mr. and Mrs. Smith March 5‚ 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Team Guardian ~ strength‚ long-term commitment‚ and growth. Purpose and Goals • Provide the clients with an investment solution that focuses on long term growth while not losing sight of important life events taking place within the next few years. • Provide the customers with a higher level of service than they are accustomed
Premium Investment Mutual fund Financial services
sweatshop practices and human rights exploitation surfaced in the 1990s‚ Nike was forced to review and change its operations in order to please the expanding group of conscientious customers who are concerned with the conditions under which the products are manufactured (Suehle‚ 2011). The pressure for change resulted in Nike’s decision to integrate corporate and social responsibility (CSR) into its business operations. Since then‚ Nike has acknowledged the importance of CSR to their innovation and performance
Premium Sustainability
Ethics of Globalization 4/12/2012 Adriano The Perils of Globalization & Learning Social Responsibility: Nike‚ Inc. As time has gone on‚ the world has begun to transform due to a phenomenon that affects just about everyone‚ the phenomenon is referred to many as globalization. In the past‚ it was somewhat accepted that the people of one country owed no obligation to the people of another nation. Each nation kept to themselves and worried predominantly about themselves and no one else. But
Premium Social responsibility Corporate social responsibility Athletic shoe
50219 BBS 3FA CASE SUMMARY & HIGHLIGHTS Formation of Nike In 1958‚ Phil Knight came realised the need of a good American running shoe and started working on his idea. In 1964‚ he along with Bowerman formed an athletic shoe company and called it Blue Ribbon Shoe (BRS) company. In 1971‚ they developed a distinctive trademark and a new brand name and this is how Nike came into existence. Exceptional economic performance Nike grew at an amazingly fast pace with profits growing from $10 million
Premium Labour relations Business ethics Human rights
Management” NIKE Introduction- The company was founded on January 25‚ 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight‚ and officially became Nike‚ Inc. on May 30‚ 1978. Nike markets its products under its own brand‚ as well as Nike Golf‚ Nike Pro‚ Nike+‚ Air Jordan‚etc. Nike is the leading maker of athletic shoes‚ equipment and apparel. Nike products cover a broad range of sports including basketball‚ football‚ running and soccer. Sneakers made by Nike are sold for $40-$200
Premium Human rights Wage Minimum wage
Amul – Product Portfolio What more can Amul do? Benefits Limitations Conclusion Bibliography 7 What Is BCG Matrix? BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP (BCG) MATRIX is developed by “BRUCE HENDERSON “of the BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP IN THE EARLY 1970’s. According to this technique‚ businesses or products are classified as low or high performers depending upon their market growth rate and relative market share. 8 9 THE BCG GROWTH-SHARE MATRIX It is a portfolio planning model
Premium Milk Strategic management
Nike Case Analysis Prepared for Consumer Behavior Introduction Nike is the largest seller of athletic footwear and athletic apparel in the world with subsidiaries in over 200 countries across the world. It is a company that was founded by Phil Knight in the 1960’s‚ who was a talented middle-distance runner from Portland. He approached the Onitsuka Co. in Kobe‚ Japan‚ and persuaded the manufacturer of Tiger shoes to make
Premium Athletic shoe Nike, Inc.
current distribution network and infrastructure that Nike had in place for its high-end footwear‚ the World Shoes‚ distributed through the same channels‚ didn’t reach the proper target market. The Series 100 and Series 400 were simply placed on a shelf next to the expensive Air Max in an urban retail store. The consumers in the intended market segment‚ who lived primarily in rural areas‚ didn’t necessarily shop at these places. However‚ Nike had no system to distribute the shoes outside of its three
Premium Athletic shoe Footwear Shoe
efficient portfolio------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 09-19 | LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL P LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL P November 22‚ 2012 Pallabi Siddiqua Assistant Professor Department of Finance University of Dhaka Dhaka Dear Madam‚ It is an honor and great pleasure for me to present my report on “Efficient Portfolio Construction”
Premium Stock market Investment Finance