Week 4 Courtroom Presentation Paper Trina Smith CJA/224 June 6‚ 2011 David Mc Killop Week 4 Courtroom Presentation Paper Everyone has been in or seen a courtroom. If not personally‚ they have definitely seen one on television. Shows like Law & Order and the First 48 gives the generalization of how a criminal is caught‚ brought to justice and it’s done all within one hour. Then there are civil court shows like Judge Judy and Judge Mathis‚ where you can see what actually happens in a court
Free Jury Judge Law
Media in the courtroom Cameras In the Courtrooms have been known to give an artificial element of what is really going on in the Courtroom‚ some parties tend to act differently when the cameras are rolling‚ cameras should be used with discretion while in the Courtroom.(Chance‚1995) Informing the Public: Even though the public wants to be informed cameras should use discretion while in the courtroom. Informing the public can be a very risky
Free Judge Jury Court
essay will talk about the participants in a courtroom. How do they work on a daily basis and what changes would I recommend. Also what is the role of the prosecutor? How does a prosecutor determine which cases to pursue? Also what are some solutions to backlog of cases? According to Schmallager (2011)‚ criminal trial participants are dividing in two categories that are professionals and outsiders. The professional are the people who work in the courtroom. They are well trained to conduct the business
Premium Criminal law Prosecutor Jury
Running head: Courtroom Observation Courtroom Observation Tracy D. Camden Liberty University BUSI 301 Robert Martin April 23‚ 2011 Courtroom Observation This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285‚ White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton‚ xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson
Premium Plaintiff Judgment Defendant
University of Phoenix | Courtroom Participant Matrix January 20‚ 2013 CJA/491 Survey of Criminal Court System Leesa McNeil | | Apollo Group[Pick the date] | University of Phoenix Material Courtroom Participant Matrix Complete the matrix below using your text and other resources. Title | Role | Responsibilities | Ethical Duties | Selection Method | Judge | Is to see that both sides follow the laws
Free Criminal law Jury Law
COURTROOM PLAYERS 1 Courtroom Players CJS/200 Brain Carter November 21‚ 2012 COURTROOM PLAYERS 2 Courtroom Players In the United States criminal justice system‚ a courtroom work group is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor‚ criminal defense attorney‚ and the judicial officer. This is a foundational concept
Free Criminal law Jury Criminal justice
The Courtroom The courtroom is where some very important decisions are made and in some cases it is where someone’s life is determined in the blink of an eye. When a criminal is arrested that does not mean that they are thrown in jail and that is it they have to go through a process after they get to jail and that process is time consuming and can costs millions of dollars and also involves many people. The Jurors Jury selection is something
Free Jury Judge
October 28‚ 2009 Courts Courtroom Observations On October 8‚ 2009 I attended a general sessions court at the Lexington County Courthouse. At this time the Judge was hearing guilty pleas. There were many people in the rather large courtroom that day. The courtroom was much larger than the one I had visited during drug court here in Spartanburg. Before the day’s session began I could see many defense attorneys going over their cases with their clients‚ some of whom were wearing bright orange
Premium Judge Jury Lawyer
Courtroom Workgroups Courtroom Workgroups are a group of everyone normally involved in a formal trial working together in a non-formal fashion. Their main goal is to try and avoid any delays and to avoid formal trials as best they can. I think this system works better than the formal system‚ because it speeds things up and‚ like the book says‚ most people who get that far in the system are usually guilty. Some of the Pros to this is‚ like I said‚ it speeds things up with the trial and is more
Premium Jury Law Trial
Courtroom Observation.doc The 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law presented a case which was argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana‚ case number 82A04-8876-CV-285‚ Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties‚ L.L.C.‚ d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern. The courtroom procedure’s purpose is to argue the motion of summary judgment with regards to the case of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties
Free Alcoholic beverage