BOOK REVIEWS Thanh Ngo July 11th‚ 2011 1110 Colorado History Online Assignment 2 Metropolitan State College of Denver BOOK REVIEWS In this portion of the assignment‚ five book reviews will used to discuss and evaluate how well the reviews have been written. By using the reviews written by the reviewer‚ we can see whether the reviewer gave a reasonable indication of the book’s contents‚ comments and interests in reading the book. In this first book by Kathy T. Hettinga‚ Grave Images:
Premium Nikola Tesla Colorado
me to accept these comments‚ make changes‚ and continue to excel. The second thing that this Peer review has allowed me to realize is that everyone has a unique and helpful perspective from which they critique work‚ this allows me to make my work appeal everyone from all angles‚ and it also broadens my imagination hearing all these different‚ yet equally interesting points. Though the peer review works just fine the way it is currently setup‚ I feel that making slight changes will allow for a
Premium The Work
Writer’s Response to Peer Review Patricia arias Central Connecticut State University Writing for the Social Work Profession – SW225 4/24/14 Dear ____‚ In this letter I will be responding to a peer review you made on my cover letters. I would like to begin by thanking you for reviewing my and assisting me in improving it. You pointed out certain things I overlooked while completing my first draft and made some helpful suggestions. Throughout the letter I will be addressing the concerns and suggestions
Premium Debut albums Improve Writing
foreign private issuers) to have quarterly reviews of interim F/S by their independent public accountants. A decade later‚ the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB) in Canada is considering whether interim F/S should be subject to mandatory reviews. The advantages and pitfalls associated with such a change can each be considered from the perspectives of the client and auditor. Benefits: One of the key benefits to both auditors and clients of interim review engagements is the earlier identification
Premium Audit Auditing Financial audit
A literature review is a text written by someone to consider the critical points of current knowledge including substantive findings‚ as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. Literature reviews are secondary sources‚ and as such‚ do not report any new or original experimental work. Also‚ a literature review can be interpreted as a review of an abstract accomplishment. Most often associated with academic-oriented literature‚ such as a thesis or peer-reviewed
Premium Academia Scientific method Peer review
My Review of Bill by Vern Myers Michael Hemmingson Bill: A Novella. Vern Myers. NY: Pelican Publishing. 102 pp. Cloth‚ $17.95. Reviewed by Gerald Bass To start‚ I would like you to know that I am writing this book review on an old fashioned manual typewriter‚ an Olympia Model 9 in fact‚ that I purchased at a consignment antique store. I think this machine dates back to the early 1970s. It makes a nostalgic clack-clack-clack sound.[1] I am not writing this book review in solidarity
Premium Ernest Hemingway American literature Jules Verne
I chose to analyze reviews of Steve Sheinkin’s Undefeated: Jim Thorpe and the Carlisle Indian School Football Team. I was able to locate three reviews after some rather frustrating searching. The first resource I used was School Library Journal‚ where I almost immediately was able to find an online review. Next‚ I pulled up the websites for Publishers Weekly and VOYA but was unable to find any reviews. I then tried Booklist but was discouraged when I discovered an account was needed to access full-text
Premium Librarian Public library Library
LEAD 510 4-MAT Book Review Instructions The 4-MAT REVIEW system is a way of responding to readings‚ lectures‚ and life experiences that requires the learner to interact with new ideas on several levels. Please use the following format in preparing 4-MAT Book Reviews: 1. Abstract. Summarize what you have read and boil the book down into 400–600 words (no more than 2 pages). Prove you comprehend the readings by writing a no-nonsense summary. The abstract is not a commentary or listing of topics
Premium Question Critical thinking Bibliography
1. Read this (this thing 1 cm. below) P. J. O’Rourke‚ the political satirist‚ reviews in this issue a new book about Starbucks. He told us‚ in an e-mail exchange‚ how he brews his own reviews: “I read something I’m reviewing the same way I read other things except more so. That is‚ I already keep a commonplace book (a file folder‚ really) for quotations‚ ideas‚ information‚ etc. If I’m going to write a review I mark the work for myself‚ but besides underlining what interests me I also underline
Premium Sentence Writing
Peer Review Michael J DeVry University Considering the most integral part of one’s paper‚ the data and information provided has to be well founded. That is why the research portion is the most important part. Anyone‚ can form an opinion‚ in which in the individual’s point of view might drown out the factual evidence. Secondly‚ what good is legitimate factual information‚ if it is interpreted badly. Therefore‚ one must have an open mind‚ and see all sides of the topic before making irrational
Premium Peer review