You asked me to determine whether our client‚ Paul Grantham‚ can challenge the sufficiency of substituted service on his secretary at Mr. Grantham’s accounting office‚ when the landlord sued him individually. I have researched Oklahoma’s service of process statute‚ and I believe that Mr. Grantham’s challenge will be successful. The Oklahoma service of process statute provides that service is valid when copies of the summons and petition are served by personal delivery. Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 12‚
Premium Service of process Civil procedure
Unit 9 Settlement Letter Final Draft James Draper Legal Writing PA105-01 Professor: Brian Tippens J.D. Law firm of: Chase‚ DiLiver and Billum‚ 456 Main Street‚ Plainview‚ GK‚ 12345 10/31/2010 To: Whack‚ Raze and Runn‚ Attorneys for Sunny Dale Gardens 123 Central Avenue‚ Plainview‚ GK‚ 23456 Attn: Richard Whack Esq
Premium Civil procedure Law Appeal
BUS 115 – Business Law Module 2- Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Case 3-3 “Discovery” Should a party to a lawsuit have to hand over its confidential business secrets as part of a discovery request? Why or why not? What limitations might a court consider imposing before requiring ATC to produce this material? The party to the law suit should hand over information during the discovery phase. However‚ discovery is allowed only if the information is relevant to the claim or defense
Premium Law Civil procedure Jury
Republic of the Philippines FOURTH JUDICIAL REGION REGIONAL TRIAL COURT BRANCH 45 San Jose‚ Occidental Mindoro OCCIDENTAL MINDORO ELECTRIC CIVIL CASE NO. R-1681 COOPERATIVE‚ INC. (OMECO) as Represented by its Chairman and President of the Board of Directors SAMUEL VILLAR and its General Manager ALFRED A. DANTIS‚ Plaintiffs‚ -versus- -for- ISLAND POWER CORPORATION RESCISSION AND RESOLUTION (IPC)‚ OF CONTRACT AND DAMAGES Defendant‚ x-------------------------------------------x
Premium Provinces of the Philippines Prime number Oriental Mindoro
Title of issue: ‘Observation of Civil Proceedings’ Name (Student): Arjun Singh Course: BBA.LLB P.R.N. No.: 10010224062 Batch: 2010-15 Name of the Court: DISTRICT & SESSION COURT HISAR Date of Observation: 24/02/2015 Case No. I: CS/183/2015 Title of the Case: KALU SINGH v. RAHUL Stage of the case: Prelimnary Hearing Appearance made by the parties: Sh. Ram Chandar Kakkar the ld. Defendant counsel appeared for the defendant i.e. Sh. Rahul. The plaintiff didn’t appear. Proceedings
Premium Legal terms Civil procedure
Melzer 1 Garrison L. Melzer Professor Gordon Williams American Literature 26 January 2015 Legislation Derailed On the Cannibal Train Mark Twain’s metaphorical satire‚ “Cannibalism in Cars”‚ demonstrates the self-serving nature of government through a bizarre story that follows the actions of the men on a train attempting to save themselves through a parliamentary process. The scenario represents the often misguided collective conscience of the government
Premium Ku Klux Klan Ulysses S. Grant Reconstruction era of the United States
Tenzin Lama Professor Kurland Business Law 30 April 2014 Eaton v. Waldrop Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama‚ __ So. 3d __ (2010). 45 So.3d 371 (2010) Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. James M. EATON‚ Jr. v. Bobby Joe WALDROP. 2081095. -- March 05‚ 2010 Type of Action: Right to a trial by jury to set aside a deed Facts: On December 16‚ 2005‚ James M. Eaton‚ Jr.‚ and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated
Premium Jury Court Appeal
Case Brief example‚ p. 16 text Case Citation Kuehn v. Pub Zone‚ Maria Karkoulas‚ et al‚ 835 A.2d. 692‚ Superior Court of N.J. Appellate Division‚ 2003 Parties Karl Kuehn/Plaintiff/ Appellant. Pub Zone/Defendant/Appellee Original Legal Action PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL‚ a business patron. Facts Rhino and Backdraft were 2 members of the motorcycle gang by the name of
Premium United States Civil procedure Appeal
Business Law 110 Mr. Blackmun Case Study Problem #1 September 16‚ 2009 Case Study: Arbitration The issue pertaining to this case is whether a court can set aside an arbitration award on the basis that it violates public policy‚ subsequent to Mr. Edson being released from his job after being found intoxicated while on duty and being awarded reinstatement by the arbitrators. Exxon Mobile‚ the employer‚ filed a suit claiming that the award contravenes with public policy‚ which opposes intoxicated
Premium Law Appeal Civil procedure
ARCHER V. WARNER (01-1418) 538 U.S. 314 (2003) 283 F.3d 230‚ reversed and remanded. NATURE OF CASE Leonard and Arlene Warner sold the Warner Manufacturing Company to Elliott and Carol Archer. The Archers sued the Warners in North Carolina state court for fraud in connection to the sale. The settlement was that the Warners would pay the Archers $300‚000. The Warners paid $200‚000 and executed a promissory note for $100‚000. The Warners failed to make payments on the promissory note and the
Premium Appeal United States Jury