CALTEX (PHILIPPINES)‚ INC.‚ vs. ENRICO PALOMAR G.R. No. L-19650 September 29‚ 1966 Caltex- respondent-appellant. Palomar - petitioner and appellee. CASTRO‚ J.: FACTS: a) In the year 1960 the Caltex conceived and laid the groundwork for a promotional scheme calculated to drum up patronage for its oil products. Denominated "Caltex Hooded Pump Contest"‚ b) it calls for participants therein to estimate the actual number of liters a hooded gas pump at each Caltex station
Premium Law Mail Civil procedure
Civil law study guide Chapter 1 1. Why does the study of law involve more than simply memorizing rules? simply memorizing the holding or "rule" of a case‚ you must be able to identify the particular factors that led the court to decide the case the way it did‚ and then determine whether those same factors are present in the case you’re now considering. 2. What is legal reasoning? The applying of the legal rules to a client’s specific factual situation 3. What is the doctrine of stare decisis
Premium Pleading Lawyer Lawsuit
Script of the Formal Meeting Test 1. Chairperson’s address Faris Assalamualaikum and good morning everyone. I’m glad to welcome all of you to the 2nd meeting of the Mont Kiara Trail Running. Thank you for coming. Can we call this meeting to order? All Yes 2. Apologies for absence Faris Are they any apologies for absence for today’s meeting? Ana Yes‚ MrAfiq is on medical leave because of accident 2 days ago and Miss Zarina is on holiday leave for her honeymoon. 3. Minutes of previous
Premium Suggestion Parliamentary procedure Democracy
ASSIGNMENT – CASE STUDY On a dreary‚ rainy night in October of 1968‚ a young woman was driving behind a lorry truck in the U.S. Perhaps impatient with the transport in front of her‚ the young woman by the name of Ms. Anderson steered her vehicle to peer around the lorry driver’s side to see if the way was clear. Before she could react‚ she was struct head on from an oncoming vehicle from the opposite direction. Ms. Anderson sustained permanent and debilitating injuries as a result of this horrific
Premium Trial Civil procedure Appeal
In the Court of Joint District‚ 2nd Court‚ Dhaka Suit No……../2014 Faizuddin Son Of: Hazi Abdul Aziz Village:Amin Bazar P.S: Savar District-Dhaka
Premium Plaintiff Complaint Defendant
Citation: Olympic Airways v. Rubina Husain Supreme Court of the United States‚ 2004 470 U. S.‚ at 406 470 U. S.‚ at 404 Summarize: In December 1997‚ Dr. Abid Hanson and his wife‚ Rubina Husain (hereinafter respondent)‚ traveled with their children and another family from San Francisco to Athens and Cairo for a family vacation. During a stopover in New York‚ Dr. Hanson learned for the first time that petitioner allowed its passengers to smoke on international flights. Because
Premium United States Law Appeal
Hildreth v. Tidewater Equipment Co. Summary John Hildreth was the sole shareholder‚ director‚ and officer HCE‚ Inc‚ a corporation in New Jersey. HCE-NJ began to do business in Maryland in early 1997. According to the Maryland code‚ it is required for foreign corporations to register with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation before doing intrastate business in Maryland‚ and it is required to have a resident agent in Maryland. In February 1998‚ HCE-NJ rented equipment from Tidewater
Premium Corporation United States Virginia
Case Two Plaintiff: Jane Chambers (Prosecution) Defendant: Giorgio’s Grill (Defense) SUMMARY Jane Chambers‚ filed a personal injury action alleging negligence by the defendant‚ Giorgio’s Grill. She alleges that she slipped and fell on a wet napkin‚ breaking her leg. The defendant denied any negligence. Giorgio’s was a restaurant which became a night club after certain hours. It had a tradition of both the wait staff and customers throwing paper napkins into the air as the music
Premium Tort Civil procedure Plaintiff
Shepardizing Shawn Shryer PA201: Introduction to Legal Research 5/16/2011 566 A.2d 227: 1. What is the parallel citation for this case (i.e.‚ the same case printed elsewhere)? | 236 N.J. Super. 473‚ *; 566 A.2d 227‚ **; 1989 N.J. Super. LEXIS 385‚ *** 2. How many cases give a positive treatment of the case‚ and how can you tell? 7 cases had a positive treatment. I know this from the symbol next to the citation. 29 N.W. 425: 1. What is the parallel citation? 69 Iowa
Premium Jury United States Appeal
SANDRA MITCHELL‚ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT VS. FRIDAYS‚ ET AL.‚ DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES CASE NO. 99-CA-201 Case Briefing 1. Parties: Identify the plaintiff and the defendant. a. SANDRA MITCHELL‚ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT b. FRIDAYS‚ ET AL.‚ DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES 2. Facts: Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case. a. On April 11‚ 1996‚ Appellant Sandra Mitchell was having dinner at Appellee Friday’s restaurant. Appellant was eating a fried clam strip when she bit into a hard substance
Premium Appeal Law Civil procedure