Alternative Dispute Resolution The case selected is a construction defect case‚ Haynes v. Adair Homes‚ Inc. The case was lastly filed in the Court of Appeals of The State of Oregon. Hynes v. Adair Homes was initially filed in the Clackamas County Circuit Court. The plaintiffs Paul and Renee Haynes contracted with the defendant Adair Homes‚ Inc. for the construction of their home. After completion of the house‚ they discovered extensive water in the underfloor crawlspace. Ponding water in the crawlspace
Premium Appeal United States Law
Andrea Lazalde Professor Mendiola Legal Environment of Business October 21‚ 2014 Court of Appeals of Texas‚ Houston (1st Dist.) MERRY HOMES‚ INC.‚ Appellant v. CHI HUNG LUU‚ Appellee. ISSUE: Chi Hung Luu‚ appellee‚ leased premises in Houston Texas‚ from Merry Homes‚ Inc.‚ with the intention of opening a bar or nightclub on the property. After Luu signed the lease‚ he submitted an application for a liquor license to the city of Houston. The city denied the application
Premium Law United States Civil procedure
Darlene Jespersen‚ Plaintiff-Appellant‚ v. Harrah’s Operating Company‚ INC.‚ Defendant-Appellee United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit April 14‚ 2006 Facts: Darlene Jespersen was a bartender at Harrah’s Casino in Reno in the sports bar. She was frequently praised by her supervisors and customers for being an outstanding employee. When Jespersen first started her job at Harrah’s the female bartenders were not required to wear makeup but were encouraged to. Jespersen tried to wear
Premium Appeal Civil procedure United States
Pat Toomey and Katie McGinty are both smart and experienced people to be part of the U.S. Senate. They hold many different positions in today’s Pennsylvanian economy . I believe that they will both hold a good place in the senate‚ but some opinions are accepted differently as we have seen in the U.S. presidential race. Pat Toomey and Katie McGinty have different life’s growing up to the 53 year old‚ 54 year old man and women they are today. Katie McGinty was born in Philadelphia on May 11‚ 1963
Premium American Civil War United States Senate Legislatures
And Now‚ The Rest Of The Story . . . By Kevin G. Cain* The McDonald’s Coffee Lawsuit 14 Journal of Consumer & Commercial Law omehow‚ somewhere along the way‚ the McDonald’s coffee lawsuit became the poster child for frivolous lawsuits. Who hasn’t taken a crack at this lawsuit for the sake of furthering their own cause? David Letterman and numerous other comedians have exploited this case as the punch-line to countless jokes.1 One of my favorite Seinfeld episodes involves Cosmo Kramer suing
Premium Law Burn Lawsuit
Statute of Limitations (SoL) on debt is the maximum amount of legal time that creditors have to take you to court in order to recover debts owed by you. Once the statute of limitations period is over‚ the creditors cannot take you through the court system to recover their debts. Statute of limitations does not cover all forms of debt‚ for example SoL does not cover federal student loans‚ most type of fines such as speeding/parking tickets‚ past due child support or income taxes. Note: This information
Premium Civil procedure Statutory law Appeal
Introduction Plaintiff: Bill‚ Charles & Don Defendant: Allan Allan advertised his motorcar for sale at $50‚000. Bill‚ Charles and Don came down for viewing. The entire three customers Bill‚ Charles and Don each have their own negotiating reasons with Allan. Allan did not response and remains silent. After that Eric was last person to come down for viewing the car. Liked and accepted Allan offers‚ immediately the car was sold to him. Having to hear that the car was already been sold‚ the plaintiffs
Premium Law Contract Common law
Description In Mc Grory v. Applied Signal Technology‚ Inc.‚ No. H036597‚ it discusses the case of wrongful termination of a manager who alleges gender discrimination claims. The facts of case describe John McGrory who worked as a department manager for Applied Signal Technology‚ Inc for 4 yrs from 2004. Later in 2008‚ Mc Grory gave Thomas a recorded verbal warning‚ after consultation with the HR department for her poor work performance and a written performance improvement plan in 2009. However
Premium United States Law Appeal
STATEMENT OF THE CASE The matter currently comes before the court on Petitioner Elizabeth Hamilton and counsel’s appeal from the 2nd Circuit award of sanctions under 28 U.S.C § 1927 (2012) for attorney’s fees to Respondent Randall’s Plumbing Supply. (J.A. 8). The initial action was brought by the Petitioner in the Southern District of New York alleging she was wrongfully terminated and seeking to recover against Respondent. (J.A. at 4.) Petitioner is represented by the law firm Sullivan & Hart
Premium Law Civil procedure Appeal
Schedule A 1. I am the defendant in this action and have personal knowledge of the following. 2. On December 1‚ 2014‚ the plaintiff loaned me $4000.00 pursuant to a promissory note of the same date. Under the terms of the note‚ the entire amount as well as interest at a rate of 12% per annum‚ commencing December 1‚ 2014‚ was due in full on March 1‚ 2015. Interest continues to accrue at the same rate until such time as all amounts are paid in full or judgment is obtained. A true copy of the promissory
Premium Debt Jury Civil procedure