In the case of State v. Rounds‚ the defense challenges the conduct of Officer Oliver Towns and the evidence his conduct yielded. The defense wages their action on three major cases‚ all of which apply‚ but none in the way cited: Riley V. California‚ 573 U.S. ____ (2014)‚ Wong Sun v. United States‚ 371 U.S. 471‚ (1963) and Carroll v United States‚ 267 U.S. 132 (1925). This case can be narrowed down to three stages: the stop‚ the search and the seizure. All of which‚ when performed‚ obeyed the limits
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
Question 5 – Transfer Price Division A‚ which is part of the ACF Group‚ manufactures only one type of product‚ a Bit‚ which it sells to external customers and also to division C‚ another member of the group. ACF Group’s policy is that divisions have the freedom to set transfer prices and choose their suppliers. The ACF Group uses residual income (RI) to assess divisional performance and each year it sets each division a target RI. The group’s cost of capital is 12% a year. Division A Budgeted
Premium Costs Variable cost Cost
and adequately investigate Taylor’s criminal background. Defendants argued that it had no legal duty to the Plaintiff and alternatively that their investigation was reasonable under the circumstances. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgement on the ground that defendant had a policy against drivers’ use of public hotel accommodations and the other conditions of employment‚ and had no reason to foresee that Taylor would commit the sexual assault against plaintiff even if the
Premium
Bria Payton Case Brief: United States v. Peterson‚ 483 F.2d 1222 (1973) Issue: Is self-defense available for a justifiable homicide case? Facts: The victim‚ Charles Keitt‚ drove to an alley way to obtain windshield wipers off the defendant’s car‚ Mr. Peterson. Mr. Peterson observed the victim‚ Mr. Keitt‚ doing this and confronted him with an altercation. The victim went back to his car and the defendant‚ Mr. Peterson‚ returned inside his home. The victim was about to leave‚ but because the defendant
Premium
Effective of Punishment V. Effective of Rehabilitation Marneissa Brown AJS 502 June 16‚ 2014 Walter Hale Effective of Punishment V. Effective of Rehabilitation This paper will discuss the effectiveness of punishment v. the effectiveness of rehabilitation. I will highlight how each affects the deterrence of crime as well as their effect on society as a whole. The notion of punishment and rehabilitation is one that has sparked debate across America for centuries. The judicial system as well as
Premium Criminal justice Crime Sociology
unemployment. In the Borowsky‚ the court had to follow the formula‚ even though the defendant was unemployed at the time. In Moncada v. Moncada‚ the court found that the petition was insufficient. The court also ordered when he found a job they would increase the amount of child support. This is because he must make up the money even though he was unemployed. In the Whitehead v. Whitehead case‚ the defendant was unemployed and asked for a petition. The court cannot only allow Mr. Whitehead to pay half instead
Premium Divorce Marriage Family law
Warfield v. Hicks‚ 91 N.C.App. 1‚ 4‚ 8‚ 370 S.E.2d 689‚ 691‚ 693 (1988). Finally‚ the Court found dismissal of a fraud claim was appropriate because the following statements were not sufficiently specific: Plaintiff complains that Defendant Popp falsely represented “the potential for sales from Popp’s Charlotte office‚” “the quality of yarn produced by Clemson‚” and “the availability of customers for Clemson Yarn.” Each of these categories‚ however‚ necessarily implies a statement of opinion‚ including
Premium Law Jury Appeal
Exclusive Hyun Kim Jung Hoon Hong Daiki Kim Meejoo Song Wooseung Sohn 1 I. INTRODUCTION In our presentation‚ there are four main subjects that we will be explaining today. Those subjects are: 1. Private goods and the Free Market System. 2.The Price Mechanism and the Invisible Hand 3. Public goods and the market failure 4. Public hand and the government failure. Before we go into the details‚ let me briefly give you the overview. First we have to approach these questions by asking ourselves… What
Premium Supply and demand Economics
remarriage of the party receiving maintenance." In the case of Kathy I. Palmer‚ Petitioner/Appellee‚ v. Sydney N. Palmer‚ Respondent/Appellant‚ Sydney (husband) referenced the above statute when filing for termination of spousal maintenance. The court had to consider whether a specified end date in the Decree took precedence over the general interpretation of the law. Facts of the Case: Palmer v. Palmer The facts of this case are as follows: The marriage between Palmer and Palmer was dissolved
Premium United States Marriage Employment
Specht v. Netscape Communication Corporation‚ 306 F.3d 17 (2nd Cir. 2002). I. FACTS Plaintiffs sued‚ Netscape‚ a software internet company who distributed the free software SmartDownload‚ for electronic eavesdropping. The Plaintiffs alleged Defendant violated two federal statutes‚ the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act‚ by capturing private information about files downloaded from the Internet . Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendant in District Court
Premium Law Civil procedure Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution