Nike: Spreading Out to Stay Together | By: Karol Czajkowski | Case 10 | 5/2/2013 5/2/2013 REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. If a sporting good can be used in sporting event‚ and especially if that event can be televised‚ Nike has likely made such a product and added a swoosh to it. But in this day and age‚ are there anymore sporting products that Nike would do better not to produce? Explain your reasoning. In the present day there are some products that Nike would not have
Premium Baseball Nike, Inc. Management
COMPANY BACKGROUND Nike is the world ’s leading designer‚ marketer and distributor of athletic footwear‚ apparel‚ equipment and accessories for a range of sports and fitness activities. Nike is headquartered in Beaverton‚ Oregon and owns facilities in Tennessee‚ North Carolina and The Netherlands. The company operates in the Americas‚ Europe‚ the Middle East‚ Africa and Asia Pacific. Nike’s primary product focus is athletic footwear designed for specific-sport and/or leisure use. Nike is the world ’s
Premium Supply and demand Marketing Athletic shoe
Problem Statement In the case of Nike versus New Balance‚ U.S Trade Representative Michael Forman will need to make a decision on the terms of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Mr. Forman will need to decide if it in American’s best economic interest to eliminate trade tariffs on imported footwear from Vietnam or to uphold the tariffs in place. To further complicate this matter‚ both Nike and New Balance were in disagreement on the opposed elimination of these tariffs. Background a. Theoretical
Premium United States
Adidas is a global leader in the athletic apparel and footwear industry. Their commitment to sustainability has been one of increasing visibility and participation. Adidas is a self declared rating through the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) in 2007. They have taken the approach of being engaged and transparent in their efforts to be recognized as a sustainability leader in the athletic footwear industry. Adidas has taken the initiative of having a working sustainability website that serves as
Free Summer Olympic Games 2008 Summer Olympics Olympic Games
Industry Analysis of ADIDAS using Porter’s Five Forces Model 1. Degree of Rivalry of ADIDAS Adidas is competing in the market with many rival firms including the world leaders Nike and PUMA. The rivalry among existing competitors is pretty high in the sports and footwear industry. As ADIDAS deals with products of low product differentiation and the switching costs are low‚ the degree of rivalry is so high. The diversity of rivals‚ that is the rival firms like NIKE‚ PUMA are of different cultural
Premium Adidas Barriers to entry Trademark
Supply Chain Structure The adidas Group has outsourced most of its production. We work with more than 1‚200 independent factories from around the world that manufacture our products in 63 countries. The most dominant sourcing locations are: China‚ India‚ Indonesia and Vietnam. Our supply chain is global and multi-layered‚ with many different types of business partners‚ some of who are directly contracted factories‚ and others who are not. In 2011‚ the top five countries per region by number of
Premium Supply chain management Adidas Manufacturing
is Nike Inc. I chose to do my research on Nike because I am for one‚ very much interested in Nike‚ and secondly I am very interested in Nike ’s clothing‚ shoes‚ and accessory line. <br> <br>Basketball players "want to be like Mike"‚ but shoe companies "want to be like NIKE." NIKE is the worlds #1 company and controls more than 40% of the US athletic shoe market. The company designs and sells shoes for just about every sport‚ including baseball‚ volleyball‚ cheerleading‚ and wrestling. NIKE also
Premium Nike, Inc. Athletic shoe Bill Bowerman
Module 3 Case Assignment 2– Under Armour’s Strategy in 2013 – Good Enough to Win Market Share from Nike & adidas? 1. How strong are the competitive forces confronting Under Armour‚ Nike‚ and The adidas Group? Provide a five-forces analysis to support your answer. The competitive forces confronting Under Armour‚ Nike and The adidas Group are: Supplier Bargaining Power Under Armour Under Armour has established multiple suppliers of raw materials and fabrics‚ most of which are dispersed
Premium Marketing Brand Strategic management
Nike Inc.‚ Cost of Capital Dr. Romer Finance 3613 By: Joseph White Michael Parker NorthPoint a mutual-fund-management firm is contemplating adding Nike Inc. stocks to its Large-Cap Fund. Kimi Ford a portfolio manager for NorthPoint has developed a discounted-cash-flow forecast to help make the decision. Kimi comes to the conclusion that Nike is overvalued at its current price of $42.09 with a 12 percent cost of capital that she estimated. To determine if her estimation is correct about
Premium Weighted average cost of capital
(13% today w/ first clean slate in FY14)‚ international presence (step-back before forward)‚ and square footage growth opportunity at Outlets as leases (typically 5 year) come due. In other words‚ growing pains. Boss also started coverage of Nike Inc. (NKE)‚ giving the company a Hold rating and a $100 price target‚ a touch above today’s $99 share price. He touts Nike’s best-in-class position in its category and also points favorably to its balance sheet: With annual free cash flow generation
Premium Stock market Stock Free cash flow