Utilitarianism was developed in the 18th century by Hutchenson‚ who used the phrase "the greatest good for the greatest number" to describe his theory. His idea of Utilitarianism‚ however‚ seeks to find a rational means of assessing how best to put this promotion of happiness into practice‚ and is split into two types; Act Utilitarianism is the earliest form‚ in which what is deemed right is based on the assessment of results of a particular action‚ and Rule Utilitarianism‚ which allows to be taken
Premium Utilitarianism
principle‚ creating the new common law of negligence in which manufacturers who fail to observe a duty of care are responsible to consumers who are harmed from the use of their products‚ even without any contractual agreements. Here‚ it can be said that prima facie‚ the doctrine of stare decisis was not closely followed and new precedencies were made‚ moving on with the new times. As summarised by Lord Wright‚ "... a rigid method of precedent is inappropriate to the construction of a constitution‚ which
Premium Law Common law Contract
segments‚ and 2.7% in the vans segment. Moreover‚ the company has 100% market share in the micro segment of the passenger car market in India. Tata has a unique brand collection which are Indica‚ Indigo‚ Manza‚ Vista‚ Sumo‚ Safari‚ Aria‚ Venture‚ Nano‚ Prima‚ Winger‚ Land Rover‚ Hispano‚ Daewoo‚ Jaguar‚ and Land Rover‚ among others. Broad portfolio automobiles product: Tata motors produce a lot of product including cars‚ buses‚ medium and heavy commercial vehicles. Tata Motors sold 141‚846 passenger
Premium Tata Motors Automotive industry Land Rover
the rest of society take of nature. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of corporate responsibility for the environment through the agent-of-society and agent-of-capital views. The agent-of-society view holds that corporate managers are prima facie obligated to consider the interests of everyone who is likely to be affected by what managers decide to do. With this view in mind‚ Michael Hoffman states‚ "Corporate managers should be held morally responsible for going beyond considerations
Premium
member of the gun-owner’s association affiliated with DC Shooting‚ from entering the range with a gun despite under the influence of alcohol‚ causing him to carelessly handle his weapon and accidentally shooting Plaintiff’s arm. Plaintiff built his prima facie case by alleging that on the day of the incident‚ defendant’s reception staff did not prevent X’s entry into the range. Plaintiff also presented witnesses who testified that prior to the shooting‚ X was stumbling out of the men’s restroom flushed
Premium Law Tort Tort law
Disparate impact occurs when •employment practices (e.g.‚ hiring‚ firing‚ promotion‚ pay or other employment decisions) have a statistically greater impact on one group than on another. ALLOCATION OF PROOF Prima facie case •Adverse action Business necessity •“Legitimate non-discriminatory reason" Alternative practice with lesser impact •Judge says that the plaintiffs need not “provide the exact floor plan”
Free Employment
the registration statement. – True‚ in case of any part of the registration statement containing an untrue statement of a material fact‚ any person acquitting such security may sue. 3. An investor who bought shares in Dandy Container would make a prima facie case if he alleged that the failure to explain the nature of the loans in question constituted a false statement or misleading omission in the financial statements. – True‚ only if the Dandy has not disclosed this in its pre-issue filings with
Premium Stock
trustee in bankruptcy who steps into the bankrupt’s shoes takes a title no better than him. He takes subject to the same equities as affected the property in the bankrupt’s hands. (What is binding on the debtor is binding on his trustee.) Therefore‚ prima facie the applicants who are prior in time must succeed. Nothing to preclude the enforcement of equitable rights of the applicants. Failure to register the caveat before the act of bankruptcy was committed would not operate to forfeit and take away
Premium Bankruptcy Property
reported the matter to the police on 19 July 1984‚ after grievance meetings failed to resolve the controversy. A criminal complaint was filed against GOMEZ‚ but the investigating fiscal dismissed the same saying that STARLITE failed to establish a prima facie case against GOMEZ. On 13 August 1983‚ private respondent GOMEZ filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against STARLITE. After the parties submitted their respective position papers‚ the Labor Arbiter rendered his decision on 15 January 1985
Premium Employment 1984 Prima facie
del 80% del empleo industrial de EE.UU. y el 90% del volumen de producción de EE.UU.. According to wine experts‚ premium California wines had achieved a quality and consistency on par with or exceeding any in the world. Según los expertos en vino‚ prima de los vinos de California ha logrado una calidad y consistencia a la par con o superiores a cualquiera en el mundo. The roughly 740 California-based wineries 1 posted record revenues of $5.9 billion in 1997‚ an increase of 11% over 1996. Los cerca
Premium Estados Unidos Estado