Toy Wars (T&N EDM) Instruction: Details: 1. Gather the Facts. Tom Daner – is the owner of a family business‚ Daner Assoc Mike Teal‚ owner Cracko Toys‚ is a million dollar client of Daner Cracko has a new Helicopter Toy - war based toy with machine guns and rescue gurney‚ battery operated - Timing is immediately post Rambo Cracko resisted caving to war toys but needed to for business survival Cracko hoping they did not enter too late Teal wants a TV campaign for the helicopter Teal
Premium Ethics Morality
Legal Analyst DATE: June 5‚ 2012 RE: Legal Memorandum‚ causes of action for presenting a prima facie case for Ima Shewin. File: #4591_NEW MATTER__________ STATEMENT OF FACTS Our client Ima Shewin is a 45-year-old African American and has asked us to represent her in filing a prima facie discrimination case and applicable causes of action on her behalf. Shewin has advanced degrees in English and journalism
Premium Sexual harassment Discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Perfectly Accurate – Boonin and Oddie encapsulate what Marquis argues in his paper “Why abortion is Immoral” in a concise way that puts the argument into perspective. However‚ the presentation of arguments in the Boonin book could be considered slightly misleading in not capturing Marquis’s attempt to address the nonhuman animals issue in his paper. Marquis’s argument involves abortion‚ or the termination of a fetus. A fetus being the unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception. By
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
In deontology duty is the basis of morality (Boss 299). There are several different kinds of duties; absolute‚ prima facie‚ positive‚ and negative. An absolute duty is always morally binding while a prima facie duty is binding unless it conflicts with a more urgent moral duty (Boss 300). Positive duties require some form of an action such as giving someone money. In contrast negative duties are duties in which restraint is necessary such as cheating (Boss 300). Immanuel Kant developed his own version
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Zippittelli v. J.C. Penney Co. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA February 28‚ 2007 JOANNE ZIPPITTELLI‚ PLAINTIFF v. J.C. PENNEY COMPANY‚ INC.‚ J.C. PENNEY TELEMARKETING‚ INC.‚ AND JAMES JOHNSON‚ DEFENDANTS The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge James M. Munley United States District Court MEMORANDUM Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18). Having been fully briefed and argued‚ the matter is ripe for disposition
Premium Discrimination
TEAM WEEKLY MODULE PROBLEM SET 2 Ryan Anderson‚ Erik Bare‚ Steven Kitchen‚ Daniel Stewart and Tamara Wogen Washington State University BA 503 Foundations In Business Law Kalvin N. Joshi‚ Esq.‚ J.D. NEGLIGENCE AND STRICT LIABILITY 1. What defense will Ragged Mountain probably assert? As the plaintiff voluntarily entered into a hazardous situation‚ aware of the inherent risk and danger involved‚ Ragged Mountain can assert the affirmative defense of
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Jurisdiction
Bail Court not to Functions as Trial Court A Court cannot conduct a mini trial at the time of considering a bail application.141 At the stage of granting of bail‚ the Court can only go into the question of the prima facie case established for granting bail. It cannot go into the question of credibility and reliability of the witnesses put up by the prosecution. The question of credibility and reliability of prosecution witnesses can only be tested during the trial.142 The Court is not expected to
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States Constitution
Running Head: Strict Liability Torts Strict Liability Torts (Product Liability) Adil Elatillah LEG 300 Professor: Queen Meheux Spring 2012 Strayer University Strict Liability exists in the criminal context as well as civil‚ it is a legal responsibility for any damages and losses caused by a person or organization due to the act which is defined a fault in the criminal law term. Strict Liability‚ especially product liability is well known in tort law‚ of course criminal law and the
Premium Strict liability Tort Common law
NORMATIVE ETHICAL THEORIES Objective • Discuss the normative ethical theories L2: Normative Ethical Theories Beliefs about how people should behave can be classified into at least 2 major categories: Teleological theories (Consequentialism) Right actions are those that produce the most or optimize the consequences of one’s choices. Behaviour is ‘ethical’ if it results in desirable behaviour 1. 2. 3. 4. Ethical egoism Ethical elitism Ethical parochialism Ethical universalism Deontological theories
Premium Utilitarianism Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant
Rawls argues that violence‚ when practicing civil disobedience‚ cannot be justified; however‚ violence is a part of civil disobedience; its qualities as both a practice and is justification hold true the goal of civil disobedience- a call for change in the laws or practices. Civil disobedience is an act in violation of a law‚ which is undertaken for moral reasons. Rawls’ view of civil disobedience is that it cannot be violent because of its nature. This practice does in fact have the abilities to
Premium Civil disobedience Nonviolence Martin Luther King, Jr.