Repair- Reconstruction Doctrine is a fundamental doctrine prevalent mostly in USA and few other countries which holds that a purchaser of a patented product may ‘repair’ the product but may not ‘reconstruct’ it. This definition though looks simple on the face of it‚ yet it is one of the most controversial doctrine with regard to patent laws across the globe. This is because of the primary reason that‚ more often the two verbs namely: ‘repair’ and ‘reconstruction’ overlap. The challenge with regard
Premium Copyright United States Law
their profits in order to keep their shareholders happy and consequently ‚ to keep their investments in the company. With a falling demand‚ a way to improve the profits earned would be to lower the costs in producing their products. As such‚ the prima facie advantage that Blades would get from importing from Thailand would the significant lowering of the production costs. This lowering of production costs stems from a procurement strategy called Low-cost country sourcing (LCCS).1 The abundance of
Premium Economics International trade Thailand
Whistleblowing It’s nearly impossible to discuss modern whistleblowing in the U.S. without mentioning the broad effect of the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and the enormous accounting scandals of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Before SOX‚ whistleblowing protection was intertwined with what most human resources specialists currently would think of as protection against employer retaliation. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSH Act) for example‚ it was illegal for employers
Premium Law Federal government of the United States Enron
EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 2: DEFINNING & PROVING DISCRIMINATION 3 I. Intentional Discrimination Against the Individual: Disparate Treatment (Pg. 58) 3 A. The Conceptual Framework (Pg. 58): 3 Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine 3 St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks 4 Foster v. Dalton 5 Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products 5 B. Proof of Causation (Pg. 107): 6 Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 6 Desert Palace Inc
Premium Discrimination
Part 1. Judicial Precedent “Stare decesis et non quieta movere” – roughly translated means “Stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established” - This is the main legal principle‚ which judges are obliged to follow the already set-up precedents‚ established by prior decisions. This means that a decision made in one case can be binding on all following cases under similar circumstances. The principle of stare decisis consists of two components. The first is the rule that a decision
Premium Common law Stare decisis
the bank learnt that the submitted documents were forged and they had been cheated. The bank approached the Mumbai police for help. Joint commissioner of police (crime)‚ Himanshu Roy‚ said‚ "After conducting initial inquiry on their complaint‚ prima facie we found about the cheating. We registered the case for further investigation." A Mumbai based company‚ which has a branch in Dubai‚ had approached HSBC for the money in 2010. The accused allegedly even arranged the bank representative’s meeting
Premium Bank United Kingdom Banking
LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 135 PARTNERSHIP ACT 1961 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation PART II NATURE OF PARTNERSHIP 3. Definition of partnership 4. Certain circumstances not prima facie partnerships 5. Postponement of rights of person lending or selling in consideration of share of profits in case of bankruptcy 6. Meaning of firm and firm name PART III RELATIONS OF PARTNERS TO PERSONS DEALING WITH THEM 7. Power of partner to bind firm 8. Partners bound
Premium Partnership Contract Corporation
Page 1 © 2013 KPMG‚ an Indian Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) a Swiss entity All rights reserved KPMG FLASH NEWS KPMG IN INDIA New Companies Act‚ 2013 - Insight Series 23 August 2013 Vol-I : Compromise/Arrangements/Amalgamations/Demergers (Restructuring) Executive Summary The Companies Bill 2012 awaiting President’s assent to become ’The Companies Act‚2013’
Premium Subsidiary Finance Company
repair and maintain common property is absolute and includes a duty to take preventative measures‚ ensuring a problem does not arise in the future. Hence‚ this duty preserves the ‘integrity of the physical structure of common property’. Prima Facie‚ the pool heater forms part of the physical structure of the common property due its location on the third floor of The Waves. The lot owners’ enjoyment of the pool is hindered as the cold water restricts its use all year round. Thus‚ the pool fails
Premium Property Law Pleading
and these policies help employees to get better relation with its employer. In these policies company need to be make employees aware of all the conditions‚ do’s and don’ts with the appropriate conditions and examples so that it will be act as prima facie for employees. It is said “companies need to make clear what is acceptable and what is not acceptable‚ with examples if necessary” (DeCenzo‚ Robbins‚ 2012). Ceratin guidelines need to be prescribed by the company as its disciplinary code of action
Premium Employment Termination of employment Law