Answer: effects‚ ideals‚ and obligations. Correct Answer: effects‚ ideals‚ and obligations. Question 5 0 out of 5 points Incorrect A key idea of Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory is that: Answer Selected Answer: all duties are prima facie duties. Correct Answer: we should treat people as ends in themselves‚ never merely as means. Question 6 5 out of 5 points Correct According to the utilitarian theory‚ an action is morally right if and only if Answer Selected Answer:
Premium Morality Ethics
Recruitment Pre-recruitment activity: 3 elements: 1. Is there a prima facie case for recruitment? • Is there actually a job to be done or can elements be distributed‚ eliminated or achieved through alternative means‚ e.g. contracting out? • Can the budget handle it? • Do workload predictions justify recruitment? • Does the hiring fit in with the business plan? 2. Job analysis Once a prima facie case has been established‚ job analysis provides the opportunity for assessing
Free Psychometrics Validity
------------------------------------------------- Foss v Harbottle Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows
Premium Pleading Plaintiff Corporation
Doctrine of Competence-competence The proper allocation of responsibilities between courts and arbitral tribunals for resolving disputes concerning arbitral jurisdiction – disputes about whether the plaintiff’s claim ought to be decided by an arbitral tribunal or a court – has been one of the most complex and controversial question of modern arbitration law. Although there is broad agreement on one general proposition that arbitrators are empowered to rule on their own jurisdiction and then proceed
Premium Arbitration Common law Contract
ACT NO. 2031 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW I. FORM AND INTERPRETATION Section 1. Form of negotiable instruments. - An instrument to be negotiable must conform to the following requirements: (a) It must be in writing and signed by the maker or drawer; (b) Must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money; (c) Must be payable on demand‚ or at a fixed or determinable future time; (d) Must be payable to order or to bearer; and (e) Where the instrument
Premium
The rule in Ryland’s v Fletcher was established in the case Rylands v Fletcher [1868]‚ decided by Blackburn J. In effect‚ it is a tort of strict liability “imposed upon a landowner who collects certain things on his land – a duty insurance against harm caused by their escape regardless of the owner’s fault”. The tort under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher is described as one of strict liability. This means that liability may be imposed on a party without finding of fault such as negligence. The plaintiff
Premium Tort Tort Complaint
where stakeholder groups would include internal‚ external and environmental constituents who can place demands on the firm (Ruf et al.‚ 2001). A moral theory that could support this view is the ethical theory of W.D. Ross in which he dictates 7 prima facie duties that each person may bear at any one time. In this case‚ a company has a duty of fidelity to its owners to act in their interest as well as the duty of nonmaleficence to its employees and the local community. In deciding which duty is more
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality
Iacocca & Ford Co. Increase (short-term)/Decrease Rev. (long-term) Increase PR issues In 5. Identify the OBLIGATIONS. State: (a) the _deontological principle (DP)_ used to assess the actions of the DECISION MAKER (e.g.‚ Kant’s ethics‚ prima facie); (b) the standard implicit in this principle (e.g. categorical imperative - Could the action be willed into universal law?); (c) the key obligations of the decision maker for each of the affected parties; (d) the extent to which each obligation
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant
the consent to what we allow to happen or not happen. Mary Anne Warren argues that no matter the situation‚ the woman always has the utmost authority in the sense of her life and body. The assertion: “But even if a potential person does have a prima facie right to life‚ such a right could not possibly outweigh the right of a woman to obtain an abortion‚ since the rights of any actual person invariably outweigh those of any potential person‚ whenever the two conflict‚” is very significant. Here‚ Warren
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights
Considering that law and religion are based on ultimate authority according to an ethical standard and runs by an individual in power and societies; therefore philosophers have come up with a theory of moral standard that roots from logic and thoughts that can be simplified for humans basic needs. In that sense‚ these needs produce the most satisfaction at the fundamental level for human being’s universally and help them to live their life’s at the fullest. For a fact‚ every human being has a simple
Premium Morality Ethics