Animal Testing ((insert name)) Effective Speaking 4/3/2013 Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience against using products that test on animals. Central Idea: Animal testing consists of a long painful process and is not required by law. We will talk about the process‚ some alternatives‚ and companies that are still animal testing despite the alternatives. Introduction: Today I will be talking with you guys about animal testing. I bet most of us in here today own or have owned a pet
Premium Science Experiment Mammal
Each year in the United States‚ an estimated 70 million animals are maimed‚ blinded‚ scalded‚ force-fed chemicals and otherwise hurt and killed because of animal testing. Things we use every day like eye shadow‚ soap‚ and furniture polish may have been tested on rats‚ guinea pigs‚ dogs‚ rabbits‚ cats‚ and other animals. These tests are used to see if the produce is harmful or not. Animal tests can’t be used to treat or prevent injuries to humans. These tests are not required by law; they only protect
Premium Skin Human Morality
Today we are debating the motion: Animal testing should be banned. We‚ the government‚ strongly agree with the motion and have two reasons for this: uncertainty and expense. The first reason why we think that animal testing should be banned is uncertainty. Drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe. For instance‚ in the 1950s‚ sleeping pill called thalidomide caused 10‚000 babies to be born with severe deformities even though it was tested on animals prior to its commercial release. This
Free Animal rights Animal testing Animal Liberation Front
Animals for testing or not In the two articles‚ Heloisa Sabin and Peggy Carlson have different points about the animal testing. Both articles argued on the issue and there does not seem to be any agreement between the two writes‚ while there is an evident disagreement between them. Sabin agrees to Animal Testing. Animal research saves human lives but Carlson disagrees. Animal tests are unreliable. In “Animal Research Saves Human Lives” Heloisa Sabin (The Wall Street Journal‚ October 18‚ 1995)
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Animal Liberation Front
we owe much of that success to biomedical research” (Parry 4). Animal experimentation is the use of animals in an experiment to assure the safety and effectiveness of a substance. Scientists use animal testing for household products‚ cosmetics and medical purposes. Using animals to test household products and cosmetics is not necessary but when it comes for medical purposes‚ it is crucial. Even then‚ experts argue that animal testing for medical purposes lead to wrong ideas and provide unreliable
Premium Animal testing Testing cosmetics on animals Medical research
Animal testing Aristotle and Erasistratus were the first two early Greek physician-scientist performed experiments on living animals. In 1859‚ Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory reinforced the conception that animals could serve as models for humans in the study of biology and physiology. Animal testing plays a large important role in pharmaceutical and medical advances‚ but many question the mortality of such use of the animal’s life. More than 100 million aninals are used for testing every
Premium Animal testing Cancer Medical research
Should Animals Testing Be Illegal According to statistics on AnimaltestingFacts.zoomshare.com‚ over 70 million animals in the U.S are forced to be burned‚ blinded‚ and fed chemicals for cosmetics‚ household products‚ and government agencies. The products that we use everyday such as make up and soap are first tested on dogs‚ cats‚ rats‚ bunnies‚ and other animals unless it is stated otherwise. These tests are done on animals first because they need to know if the product will harm their customers
Premium Animal rights Human Human anatomy
to deserve this cruel punishment? Well‚ neither have the animals tortured behind laboratory doors used for research and testing. These tests evaluate how toxic our consumer products may be. Other tests are for medical or physiological research. But Animal Testing isn’t just giving a mouse a pill to see what it does. It’s much more than that. Not only is Animal testing cruel‚ but with modern techniques it is completely unnecessary Animals in laboratories across North America are kept from public
Premium Animal rights People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Animal Liberation Front
December‚ 2012 Animal Experimentation Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation. Animal rights activist oppose the use of animals for medical research arguing that it’s cruel and immoral. The truth is some of the animals dont even suffer. Many
Free Animal rights Animal testing People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Composition 1 10 October 2013 Animal Testing Over 100 million animals are burned‚ crippled‚ poisoned‚ and abused in United States labs every year. These animals have no say or choice to be put through such an inhumane thing. Humans would not want to be caged up and poked with needles‚ so why treat animals that way? Animal testing is cruel and harmful to them and it should be banned in all laboratories. Humans and animals do not have the same bodies. Animals are much smaller and could react
Premium Suffering The Animals Erectile dysfunction