"Problem solving courts working" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 42 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Roles

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    government throughout the court process. They assess the details brought to them by law enforcement to clearly establish a result whether or not to file charges or drop the case entirely. If the case looks like the prosecutors have a possibility to win in court‚ than they will most likely get ready for court after the right charges are filed. The prosecutors are the people that put the criminals behind bars. The prosecuting attorney can do anything reasonable to make sure the court is acting only on

    Premium Law Crime Criminal justice

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hierarchy of Courts

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Explain the hierarchy of courts in Malaysia. Discuss in details. Law is defined as any system of regulations to govern the conduct of the people of a community‚ society or nation. It is the governmental response to society ’s need for both regularity‚ consistency and justice based upon collective human experience. A statute‚ ordinance‚ or regulation enacted by the legislative branch of a government and signed into law‚ or in some nations created by decree/judgement without any democratic process

    Premium Judge Malaysia Law

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hierarchy Court

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    CHAPTER 1 THE COURT STRUCTURE - The present court structure has been in effect since June 1994 following the Constitution (Amendment) Act 1994. - The judicial powers are exercised by the Subordinate Courts and the superior courts organised in a hierarchy where the Subordinate Courts are at the lower level and the superior courts at the higher level. THE SUBORDINATE COURTS (The Subordinate Courts Act 1948) THE PENGHULU’S COURT - The Penghulu’s Court is presided over by a Penghulu who has

    Premium Judge Appeal Criminal law

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Reflection

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Court Reflection On the 5th of May 2011 a 42 year old male faced the Brisbane Magistrates court for prosecution. His name and other identifying details will be withheld for privacy reasons. The accused was charged with the following offences: one count of knowingly participating in provisions of prostitution under s 229H of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld)‚ one count of an indecent act - namely masturbation under s 227(1)(b) of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld)‚ and three summary offences for breeches of

    Premium Ethics

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Essay

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    COURT ASSIGNMENT DETAIL COURT ASSIGNMENT IS DUE BY MARCH 25‚ 2013 USE THE INFORMATION BELOW AS A GUIDELINE Report to include the date and time of your attendance. The court rooms you observed. - Observe criminal proceedings and identify terms discussed in class such as bail‚ show cause‚ probation‚ sentences‚ incarceration‚ parole‚ conditional sentence‚ curfews‚ restitution‚ diversion‚ warrants‚ etc. - Provide a brief synopsis of your observations incorporating concepts discussed in class

    Premium Criminal law Crime

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cameras in Court

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages

    decision of U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema to ban photographers and Court TV from the proceedings was wrong‚ based on the constitutional rights of the public and previous statutes. This paper will cover various cases involving televised court proceedings and public opinion concerning the media coverage of criminal trials. Table of Contents Background 4 Cameras in the Court 5 Supreme Court 6 Cameras Introduced to the Courts 8 Justification for Televising Moussaoui 9 Summary 10 References

    Premium Supreme Court of the United States Court United States Constitution

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Which court did you attend and what was the date of your attendance? (e.g. Magistrates Court in Brisbane; Supreme Court in Sydney etc) 2. What kind of hearing did you attend?(e.g. sentence‚ summary trial‚ committal hearing‚ jury trial‚ mention‚ call-over etc.) I attended an appeal against sentence. This is when the accused feels the sentence they were given is too severe‚ in which case a request is put forth to a higher court for the review and rehearing of evidence to change the decision

    Free Jury Trial Appeal

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    court case

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    predators within a safe establishment during school‚ school outing‚ or even when participating in after school activities is unacceptable and causes potential for liability charges. In student injury cases such as Hansen vs. Board of Education‚ the court observed a pattern with careless hiring‚ neglectful supervision‚ and unconcerned retention. It is important to cautiously screen all candidates‚ conduct suitable evaluations‚ and to create an environment that allows teachers to have witnesses. This

    Premium Education High school Pleading

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Probate Court

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages

    IN THE PROBATE COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN RE: ESTATE OF ) ESTATE NO. ____________ ) ROSALYN PARKS/BOWMAN a/k/a ROSALYN ) PETITION FOR LETTERS PARKS‚ f/k/a ROSALYN KELLY ) OF ADMINISTRATION DECEASED TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE PROBATE COURT: The petition of EBONY FELICIA HARRIS whose domicile is/are 214 Maner Terrace‚ S.E.‚ Smyrna‚ Georgia 30080 ‚ and whose mailing address(es) is/are SAME shows: 1. ROSALYN (nmn)

    Premium Inheritance Death

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Decisions

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Court Decisions Sandra Shemick HSM 240 February 15‚ 2015 Erin Akins Court Decisions I chose Drug testing programs for welfare applicants. The reason I chose this is because I happen to agree with doing so. I disagree with the junction that the judge put in saying that it is “likely unconstitutional”. I feel this because I am a strong supporter in helping those who are in need‚ not those that are abusing the help. As a mother of two‚ and have been on state assistance for help‚ I often would see

    Premium Drug addiction Michigan Bill Clinton

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 50