shareholder value (Niezen‚ Weller & Deringer‚ 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their competitive advantage through strategically managing and utilizing their supply chain. The purpose of this report is to compare and evaluate the supply chain management practices of Nike & Adidas. 2. CORPORATE PROFILE 2.1 Nike Corporate Profile Based in Beaverton‚ Oregon‚ and employing approximately 29‚000 people worldwide‚ Nike Inc. is the world’s leading designer and marketer of
Premium Supply chain management
narrow versus broad and the extent to which a business seeks to differentiate its products. The four strategies are summarised in the figure below: The differentiation and cost leadership strategies seek competitive advantage in a broad range of market or industry segments. By contrast‚ the differentiation focus and cost focus strategies are adopted in a narrow market or industry. Strategy - Differentiation This strategy involves selecting one or more criteria used by buyers in a market
Premium Marketing Strategic management
Financial Analysis Nike Inc. vs. Adidas AG Submitted to: Dr. Ismail Gomaa By: Ghada Mahmoud Saafan 1/1/2010 CONTENTS Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology: ................................................................................................................................................................3 Nike Inc. ............
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Asset
Case Study: We can describe Apple’s strategy in terms of product differentiation and strategic alliances. Product Differentiation Apple prides itself on its innovation. When reviewing the history of Apple‚ it is evident that this attitude permeated the company during its peaks of success. For instance‚ Apple pioneered the PDA market by introducing the Newton in 1993. Later‚ Apple introduced the easy-to-use iMac in 1998‚ and updates following 1998. It released a highly stable operating system
Premium Apple Inc.
financialAnnual Financials for Nike Inc. Cl B View Ratios Fiscal year is June-May. All values USD millions. | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 5-year trend | Sales/Revenue | 19.08B | 18.96B | 20.89B | 24.12B | 25.31B | | Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) incl. D&A | 10.91B | 10.61B | 11.47B | 13.62B | 14.28B | | COGS excluding D&A | 10.56B | 10.27B | 11.12B | 13.23B | 14.28B | | Depreciation & Amortization Expense | 346.9M | 337.2M | 351M | 395M | - | | Depreciation | 335M
Premium Revenue Expense Earnings before interest and taxes
PROMOTION! NIKE Nike is the world’s #1 manufacturer and marketer of athletic footwear and apparel. Almost out of the blue‚ the company established itself as one of the world’s most familiar brands during the 1980s and 1990s.and now 2000s. As familiar as a Coke bottle or Big Mac‚ the Nike "swoosh" logo came to symbolize not just sports culture‚ but street culture‚ as the appeal of the star players who endorsed the brand was carried onto city streets. Nike is undisputed leader in sports-oriented
Premium
the organization. On the hand‚ external competitiveness refers to how an organization pays for jobs in relation to its competitors. For example‚ Adidas pays its employees in relation to Nike’s pay to its employees. The organization sets its pay limits with respect to the lower limit pay rate and upper limit pay rate (Hill &Irwin‚ 11). According to Nike code of conduct‚ the organization uses both internal alignment and external competitiveness. This is because it pays minimum wage to its employees
Premium Employment Management Minimum wage
high400 – 1000 DKK | Medium to high300 – 3500 DKK | Medium to high200 – 500 DKK | Promotion | * Online shop * New products * Events * Charity * Celebrities * Environmental – friendly products | * Online shop * Events * Donations * Environmental – friendly products * Celebrities | * Online shop * Events * APP’s on iPhone * Environmental – friendly products * Celebrities | * Online shop * Events * Donations * APP’s on iPhone * Discounts | Brand image | Worldwide
Premium Athletic shoe Adidas Reebok
Herbert Hainer‚ CEO Adidas‚ speaks openly and honestly about his efforts to knock Nike off the Top Spot in 2010 by leveraging the firm’s $200 million World Cup sponsorship push to its full advantage. Currently within spitting distance of Nike’s 2007 €11.1 billion revenue‚ Herbert explains how the World Cup equates to big wins for brands like Adidas in terms of sponsorship‚ advertising and exposure. “The World Cup is definitely the biggest event for us‚” he admits‚ adding that football is in the
Premium Adidas FIFA World Cup FIFA
Industry Analysis of Adidas using Porter’s Five Forces ADIDAS ‚ the world famous brand in Sports wear industry adopts some unique strategies to remain as one of the major player in the global market though there is stiff competition .Using Porter’s Five Forces‚ we are analysing the strategies adopted by ADIDAS in this Case Analysis. Degree of Rivalry of ADIDAS Adidas is competing in the market with many rival firms including the world leaders Nike‚ PUMA‚ FILA etc. The rivalry among existing competitors
Premium Barriers to entry Adidas Trademark