Strict Liability “The law presumes that mens rea is always required in criminal offences‚ unless it is clear that Parliament intended an offence to be one of strict liability”. Discuss. (25marks) The general principle of criminal law is that the prosecution must establish the presence of both actus reus and mens rea. As the majority of criminal offences are created by statute‚ Parliament will usually indicate the kind of mens rea required
Premium Criminal law
! ! ! Liability for Negligence! 1. The Duty! PURE ECONOMIC LOSS ! Neighbour Test (Donoghue v Stevenson): Care must be taken to avoid acts Salient Features Test (Perre v Apand): Neighbour test is not enough in cases of which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who are pure economic loss to establish a duty of care‚ which caused a need for further persons I ought to reasonably have in contemplation as I take an action/omission. tests to identify
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
economics and marketing suggests that since Raymond Vernon published his article "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle" in 1966‚1 there has been a simultaneous development of literature pertaining to the ’product cycle’ in marketing. There are differences between Vernon’s concept of the product cycle and marketers’ perception of the product life cycle. However‚ when one reviews publications in areas where these disciplines tend to overlap‚ particularly in international marketing
Premium International trade Product life cycle management Marketing
Company Background The Australian Pineapple Products Exporting Company (APPEC) was incorporated in Central Queensland‚ Australia by a group of 10 top pineapple-growers and merchants (5 large individual growers‚ 1 large fruit merchant already exporting‚ 4 packing sheds representing groups of growers). These 10 pineapple-growers are among the best operators from each of the four main pineapple-growing districts‚ Central Queensland‚ North Queensland‚ Southern Queensland‚ and the Wide Bay area near
Premium Gross domestic product Australia Value added
New Product Development Plan Grassbot The Robotic LawnMower DeVry University Online Table of Contents Preliminary Outline 1 I. Phase 1: Opportunity Identification and Selection (Initial Market Research) 1 II. Phase 2: Concept Generation 2 III. Phase 3: Concept / Project Evaluation 2 IV. Phase 4: Development 2 V. Phase 5: Launch 3 Product Description 4 I. Quick one time setup includes: 4 II. Features & Benefits 4 III. Specifications 5 IV. Technical specifications: 6 V. Market
Premium Lawn mower New product development Marketing
137 The new new product development game Stop running the relay race and take up rugby Hirotaka Takeuchi and Ikujiro Nonaka In today’s fast-paced‚ fiercely competitive world of commercial new product development‚ speed and flexibility are essential. Companies are increasingly realizing that the old‚ sequential approach to developing new products simply won’t get the job done. Instead‚ companies in Japan and the United States are using a holistic method—as in rugby‚ the ball gets
Premium New product development Team
each part relevant to the understanding of responsibility and liability in the company by the company management. Introduction- will provide some information in the relation to the financial information. Why do we need it and how it has been develop across the years? It will also provide the base understanding of why we need the financial report and how he affects the responsibility or the liability of the company management. Liability versus responsibility- will provide some basics understanding
Premium Balance sheet Financial statements Management
DEFENITION: STRICT LIABILITY RYLANDS V FLETCHER CASE i. FACTS ii. DIAGRAMATICAL REPRESENTATION iii. JUDGEMENT iv. EFFECTS OF THE CASE v. EFFECTS OF THE CASE IN INDIA vi. CONCLUSION vii. ESSENTIALS EXCEPTIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY STRICT LIABILITY • A person may be liable for some harm even though he is not negligent in causing the same or does not intentionally cause it or is careful or has taken steps to prevent the same. • e.g.‚ The defendant is liable to the neighbor
Premium Tort Legal terms Law
Supplies’ CEO has asked you to advise him on the facts of the case‚ and your opinion of their potential liability. He wants to settle the case. Write a memo to him which states your view of whether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws which apply and any precedential cases either for or against Teddy’s case which impact liability. Include in the memo your suggested "offer of settlement" to Virginia. Back up your offer using your analysis
Premium Abuse Bullying Supreme Court of the United States
OCCUPIERS LIABILITY The occupancy of premises is affected by two statues: 1) The occupier’s liability act 1957. Under this act there is a duty to keep safe and lawful visitors to the premises 2) The occupier’s liability act 1984. Where an occupier may owe a duty to protect trespassers onto the premises. LAWFUL VISITORS A lawful visitor has permission to enter premises. This can be expressed permission of implied. There are four situations covering implied permissions: 1) If the occupier
Premium Management Contract Risk