tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel tata steel TATA STEEL Rajeev Upadhyay PGDIM18 Sec C Roll No 182 TATA STEEL Diversity enriches any large organisation and enhances its collective capabilities. A clear‚ shared vision is a key requisite for successful diversity management. Vision
Premium Balanced scorecard Strategy map Tata Group
tremendous sense of accomplishment. As head of the Commercial Vehicles Division within India’s giant Tata Motors‚ Kant had helped orchestrate the winning bid for Daewoo Commercial Vehicles (DWCV) after the South Korean government decided to auction off the failing company‚ accepting bids from many of the world’s leading auto makers in 2004. Winning the bid had by no means been a sure thing‚ and Tata had to overcome several obstacles along the way. Kant recalled a surprising conversation with a mid-level
Premium South Korea Tata Motors Tata Group
Should Ratan Tata acquire Jaguar and Land Rover? New technology and markets But they really focused on the middle class Is M&A the best route for Tata to move forward globally? Wanted to diversify country risk Infrastructure lim itations Regulations loosened Growth of the indian economy Watches‚ hotels‚ steel‚ tea competitiveness diminished by aid from government thru tarrifs Steel deomestic expansion or de-integrated strategy Mature market m&a Raw materials security Downstream
Premium Tata Motors Land Rover Globalization
for the Tata Steel. In 2007‚ when Tata Group acquired British based Corus Company‚ it became the 6th largest Steel Producer in the world‚ however it affected very negatively at the time because of U.S economic crisis. As the economy is recovering year by year‚ the Corus Company acquisition is giving tremendous benefits and profit for the Tata Group. Therefore‚ overall today’s economy has a positive effect on Tata Steel. Sociocultural Segment. According to the Tata Steel Annual Report‚ Tata Steel
Premium Steel Mittal Steel Company Corus Group
Promotion based on seniority Argurments against promotion based on seniority Group 2 Tran Vo Anh Duy Nguyen Huy Hoang Nguyen Huy Hung Phan Nguyen Khanh Ly Lam Thi Phuong Minh Le Thuy Uyen Human Resource Management MBC: 3.3 Prf: Dr. Lam Nguyen Supporting arguments Before giving several disadvantages of using promotion based on seniority system‚ definition of seniority is considered. In his book‚ Zack (1989) stated‚ “The
Premium Employment Performance management Promotion
The Tata Group Managing a Conglomerate in an Emerging Market Environmental Analysis In 1991 the Indian government introduced a series of drastic reforms‚ liberalizing its government owned and controlled economy. Product expansion and new market entry became easier for companies in virtually every sector of the economy. This presented Tata with many opportunities to leverage its strong brand equity and financial resources to enter new markets
Premium Brand Tata Group Strategic management
Tata Motors The Indian Automobile industry The automotive sector is one of the core industries of the Indian economy‚ Continuous economic liberalization over the years by the government of India has resulted in making India as one of the prime business destination for many global automotive players. The automotive sector in India is growing at around 18 per cent per annum. The cumulative annual growth rate of production of the automotive industry from the year 2000-2001 to 2005-2006 was 17 per
Premium Tata Motors Automotive industry Ranbaxy Laboratories
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT PROJECT TATA- CORUS ACQUISITION SUBMITTED TO: Dean Dr. Badrinath Prof. K. Govindarajan SUBMITTED BY BADRI NARAYANAN - 112071013 TABLE OF CONTENTS SR NO 1. PARTICULARS PART 1 • Global steel industry • About TATA Steel • About Corus PART 2 • Legal form • Mergers and Acquisition • Method • Terms of transaction • Valuation Matters 2. 3. PART -3 • Reasons for the merger • Objectives for a merger • Culture differences • Post - Acquisition 4
Premium Corus Group Steel
WORKING PAPER: 06-03 Mar. 2006 The Tata Group after the JRD Period: Management and Ownership Structure by Ram Kumar Kakani & Tejas Joshi XLRI‚ Jamshedpur 831001‚ India E-Mail: kakani@xlri.ac.in Last updated in Feb. 2008 Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=889394 XLRI Working Paper: 06-03 2 The Tata Group after the JRD Period: Management and Ownership Structure1 Ram Kumar Kakani & Tejas Joshi E-Mail: kakani@xlri.ac.in Abstract Complex ownership structures
Premium Tata Group
IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) e-ISSN: 2278-487X‚ p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 11‚ Issue 1 (May. - Jun. 2013)‚ PP 41-47 www.iosrjournals.org An Analysis of the Impact of Merger and Acquisition of Corus by Tata Steel Manoj Kumara N V 1‚ Dr. Satyanarayana2 1 (Doctoral Student‚ Department of Post Graduate Studies in Management Sciences‚Maharaja Research foundation. University of Mysore‚ India) 2 (HOD and Professor‚ Department of Post Graduate Studies in Management Sciences
Premium Mergers and acquisitions