Mockingbird‚ displayed controversial themes of prejudice and segregation that occurred in the 1930s. The novel displays racial inequities still present today‚ these can be observable through occupations that are influenced through racial profiling‚ wrongful
Premium Black people Race White people
presentation stage in expert witness testimony in court (3). Not only has contamination been a reason for false convictions (1)‚ but also the ways in which the testimony from the hair analysts is worded (3). Investigations of how the phrasing and wording of expert witness testimony impacts the final court decision have been done‚ revealing the misuse of words in court have contributed to wrongful convictions‚ which have created the view of unreliability to the science of hair analysis (3). Forensic scientists
Premium Questioned document examination Forensic science Sherlock Holmes
The Death Penalty: Against the use of Capital Punishment Capital Punishment is defined as the execution of a convicted criminal by state as punishment for their grievous capital crimes. The death penalty is an ancient practice and a very controversial issue. The main reasons for removing or retaining the death penalty differs from country to country‚ but generally includes issues such as deterrence‚ retribution‚ public opinion‚ and the rights of the individual. Due to the fact that the death
Premium Capital punishment Murder Crime
Guide to Understanding the Rights of the Accused under the Bill of Rights AMENDMENT IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated‚ and no Warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by Oath or affirmation‚ and particularly describing the place to be searched‚ and the persons or things to be seized. Terms and Tidbits Unreasonable Regulates government action‚ not
Premium United States Constitution Jury Criminal law
1 THE ROLE AND INDEPENDENCE OF PROSECUTORS Paul Mageean‚ Belfast‚ Northern Ireland 17th May 2005‚ Cairo. I. INTRODUCTION I would like firstly to thank the organisers of this event for the invitation to speak to you today. I would also like to acknowledge the role of Professor John Jackson from the School of Law in Queens University Belfast. The international sections of this paper draw on his work. I should also like to make clear that I am speaking in my personal capacity today. This paper
Premium Prosecutor Criminal law Lawyer
was involved. Research shows‚ however‚ that the testimony of eyewitnesses is not always as dependable as it seems. Often‚ eyewitnesses misremember events and misidentify people. This has resulted in the wrongful convictions of many innocent people. Scientific American reports that 239 convictions have been overturned since the introduction of DNA evidence in the 1990s. Eyewitness testimony contributed to 73 percent of the
Premium Crime Criminal law Eyewitness identification
Reprint … … … … … 2001 Kidnapping LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 365 KIDNAPPING ACT 1961 3 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Short title and application Interpretation Abduction‚ wrongful restraint or wrongful confinement for ransom Seizure and forfeiture of conveyance Knowingly receiving ransom Knowingly negotiating to obtain‚ or for payment of‚ ransom Power to freeze bank account Public Prosecutor’s power to order inspection of books‚ accounts
Premium Law Money Police
In addition to the factors that tend to affect more women‚ there are societal restrictions and pressures that add to the wrongful convictions. The previously mentioned amicus curiae brief also argued this idea saying “wrongfully convicted women not only are punished for crimes they did not commit‚ but also are vilified in the court of public opinion for violating societal expectations based on their gender” and it argues that “society unfairly deems female suspects guilty” with an “automatic condemnation”
Premium Gender role Gender Criminal law
for some circumstantial evidence‚ such as previous convictions‚ to be used as evidence. If a juror conducts internet research and discovers this information their judgement could be swayed based on the external evidence thus resulting in an unfair trial. Jury misconduct‚ such as internet research‚ can have vast repercussions on a case‚ causing a juror (or whole jury) to be replaced if recognised before verdict‚ or causing a mistrial if the misconduct is found after
Premium Police Crime Criminal law
mother (his only heir)‚ John‚ and Jimmy’s Poor-Man’s Bar (which was owned by five men‚ including Jimmy)‚ sued Software Inc. for the damage caused by Coleman. Coleman sues Software Inc. for wrongful termination. Lastly‚ the jewelry store sued Software Inc. for the value of the ring. Should Coleman win his wrongful termination suit with Software Inc.? Will Software Inc. be liable to the owners of Jimmy’s bar? What about Jimmy’s mom? Does the same law apply to both cases? Will John win his lawsuit
Premium Employment Law